Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Resolution"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Case Study
Arbitral action and preventive methods against predatory journal practice
Sung Pil Park, Eric Yong Joong Lee, Ji Hee Suh
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):49-52.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.118
  • 12,203 View
  • 231 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
As open access model of journal publication increases, predatory journals, which deceive scholars to publish journals in fake database websites and exploit them for publishing fee, is also increasing. There are two types of predatory journals. First, journal hijacking and cybersquatting generally create fake database website by mimicking authentic database website, thereby defrauding scholars for publication fee. Second, journal phishing use scam emails to steal scholars’ personal information. If scholars suffered damage from predatory journals, scholars can take either arbitral or judicial actions. Arbitral action follows arbitrational resolution process termed Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy. Scholars can join Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy proceeding with legal entity that has right to authentic database website, which will result in cancellation or transfer of fake database website. In contrast, scholars can take judicial action under Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which may help scholars to recover an actual monetary damage from predatory journals. Nonetheless, taking precaution to avoid predatory journals is the best course of action, rather than going through arduous cure procedures. Scholars may prevent predatory journals by carefully examining fake database website names or email addresses, or observing unreasonable number of published article issues in predatory journal websites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals?
    Aamir Raoof Memon
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 146.     CrossRef
Review
Handling digital images for publication
Jun Haeng Lee
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):58-61.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.58
  • 50,433 View
  • 423 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

Currently, images in medical journals are produced in the form of digital image files. The quality of printed images can be easily recognized. However, what comprises the quality of a digital image file is more complex. Some images appear to have good quality when displayed on a computer monitor but do not have sufficient quality for scholarly publication. In this review, basic concepts of digital images for scholarly publication, such as resolution, raster images, and vector images, will be explained. The advantages and limitations of using PowerPoint for processing digital image files will also be touched on briefly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • From Virtual Smile Design to Guided Wax-up Using Adobe Photoshop
    Mohammed A Akl, Alvin G Wee
    International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry.2020; 10(4): 176.     CrossRef
  • Statistical data presentation
    Junyong In, Sangseok Lee
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 70(3): 267.     CrossRef
  • Appraising Spatio-Temporal Shifting of Urban Growth Center of Pimpri-Chinchwad Industrialized City, India Using Shannon Entropy Method
    R. S. Ranpise, A. K. Kadam, S. W. Gaikwad, D. C. Meshram
    Current Urban Studies.2016; 04(03): 343.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing