Science Editing

Review

Types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review based on the literature and surgeons’ opinions via Twitter: a narrative review: Sameh Hany Emile, Hytham K. S. Hamid, Semra Demirli Atici, Doga Nur Kosker, Mario Virgilio Papa, Hossam Elfeki, Chee Yang Tan, Alaa El-Hussuna, Steven D. Wexner; Sci Ed. 2022;9(1):3-14. Published online February 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.257

65,535 View
325 Download

Abstract PDF: This review aimed to illustrate the types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review (PR) based on a literature review together with the opinions of a social media audience via Twitter. This study was conducted via the #OpenSourceResearch collaborative platform and combined a comprehensive literature search on the current PR system with the opinions of a social media audience of surgeons who are actively engaged in the current PR system. Six independent researchers conducted a literature search of electronic databases in addition to Google Scholar. Electronic polls were organized via Twitter to assess surgeons’ opinions on the current PR system and potential alternative approaches. PR can be classified into single-blind, double-blind, triple-blind, and open PR. Newer PR systems include interactive platforms, prepublication and postpublication commenting or review, transparent review, and collaborative review. The main limitations of the current PR system are its allegedly time-consuming nature and inconsistent, biased, and non-transparent results. Suggestions to improve the PR process include employing an interactive, double-blind PR system, using artificial intelligence to recruit reviewers, providing incentives for reviewers, and using PR templates. The above results offer several concepts for possible alternative approaches and modifications to this critically important process.

Original Articles

Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite: John Harbord; Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):32-38. Published online February 19, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.115

14,013 View
222 Download
5 Web of Science
2 Crossref

This paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multiliterate and 15 L2 monoliterate scholars connected to one university in Central Europe between 2010 and 2014, I show how incentives to publish in English constructed by educational policies often push ambitious young researchers whose first language is not English away from engaging in academic and societal debates in their first language community. They may thus disengage from the national community, with negative consequences for the interaction between global and local that is essential for good governance. To overcome the difficulty young scholars encounter in writing in their native languages, they should be taught writing both in their native language and in English. Furthermore, university and state policies should reward scholars for writing not only for the international community but also for local society.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

EMI, power and expressivism
René Gabriëls, Robert Wilkinson
Journal of English-Medium Instruction.2024; 3(1): 1. CrossRef
Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef

Rapid growth of international collaboration from articles indexed in Scopus database by researchers in Korea from 2006 to 2015: Yeonok Chung, Kihong Kim; Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):18-23. Published online February 20, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.84

9,818 View
155 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

It aimed at analyzing the trends of international collaboration from articles indexed in Scopus by researchers in Korea from 2006 to 2015. The number of articles coauthored by researchers in Korea and those in selected foreign countries was obtained from document searches of the Scopus database. The growth of research collaboration in various academic disciplines was also studied. There were 22 countries which produced over 2,000 papers in collaboration with researchers in Korea during the ten-year period between 2006 and 2015. The average of the average annual growth rate taken over these 22 countries was 12.9%. In 9 additional Asian, Latin American, and African countries, more rapid growth of international research collaboration was clearly seen. Though research collaboration is most active in the field of physics and astronomy with most countries, it was found that the growth of collaboration in medicine was most remarkable in Southeast Asian countries. It may be originated from the intimate relationship between Korea and Southeast Asia and the leadership of Korean physicians in that region.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reflections on the Basic Manuscript Editors’ Training 2017
Hakbong Lee
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 93. CrossRef

Case Study

Scientific and technological journals in Vietnam: the current state and direction of development: Banh Tien Long, Nguyen Duc Toan; Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):18-21. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.31

19,282 View
185 Download
5 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Vietnam is on its way to becoming a more developed country and more integrated into the global community. One of the most important key factors for development is science and technology. Scientific publications bring the most up-to-date information to scientists, researchers, and society. The quality of Vietnam’s scientific journals should be increased to international level. Also, the number of high quality articles published in international journals from Vietnam is limited compared to the number of researchers in Vietnam. There is still no Vietnamese journal indexed in Web of Science up to January 2015; while, three journals has been indexed in Scopus. This article discusses the current scenario of scientific and technological journals in Vietnam and the trend of development to international level.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mathematical Modeling Research Output Impacting New Technological Development: An Axiomatization to Build Novelty
Mohd Razip Bajuri, Zailan Siri, Mohd Nor Syahrir Abdullah
Axioms.2022; 11(6): 264. CrossRef
The harsh world of publishing in emerging regions and implications for editors and publishers: The case of Vietnam
Quan‐Hoang Vuong
Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 314. CrossRef
Nemo Solus Satis Sapit: Trends of Research Collaborations in the Vietnamese Social Sciences, Observing 2008–2017 Scopus Data
Quan-Hoang Vuong, Tung Manh Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, Ha Viet Nguyen, Nancy Napier, Hiep-Hung Pham
Publications.2017; 5(4): 24. CrossRef
Academic journals and cultural diversity
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2015; 2(1): 1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search