This article presents the growth and development of preprints to help authors, editors, and publishers understand and adopt appropriate strategies for incorporating preprints within their scholarly communication strategies. The article considers: preprint history and evolution, integration of preprints and journals, and the benefits and disadvantages, and challenges that preprints offer. The article discusses the two largest and most established preprint servers, arXiv.org (established in 1991) and SSRN (1994), the OSF (Open Science Foundation) initiative that supported preprint growth (2010), bioRxiv (2013), and medRxiv (2019). It then discusses six different levels of acceptance of preprints within journals: uneasy relationship, acceptance of preprint articles, encouraging authors to preprint their articles, active participation with preprints, submerger by reviewing preprints, and finally merger and overlay models. It is notable that most journals now accept submissions that have been posted as preprints. The benefits of preprints include fast circulation, priority publication, increased visibility, community feedback, and contribution to open science. Disadvantages include information overload, inadequate quality assurance, citation dilution, information manipulation and inflation of results. As preprints become mainstream it is likely that they will benefit authors but disadvantage publishers and journals. Authors are encouraged to preprint their own articles but to be cautious about using preprints as the basis for their own research. Editors are encouraged to develop preprint policies and be aware that double-blind review is not possible with preprinting of articles and that allowing citations to preprints is to be encouraged. In conclusion, journal-related stakeholders should consider preprints as an unavoidable development, taking into consideration both the benefits and disadvantages.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The importance of rigor in pharmacy research: challenges and solutions Michael R. Gionfriddo, Chyna McClendon, David A. Nolfi, Melissa A. Kalarchian, Jordan R. Covvey Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Seeing the forest for the trees and the changing seasons in the vast land of scholarly publishing Soo Jung Shin Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 81. CrossRef
To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey Rong Ni, Ludo Waltman Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(6): 749. CrossRef
Open publishing of public health research in Africa: an exploratory investigation of the barriers and solutions Pasipanodya Ian Machingura Ruredzo, Dominic Dankwah Agyei, Modibo Sangare, Richard F. Heller Insights the UKSG journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the current dynamics of preprints Raj Rajeshwar Malinda, Dipika Mishra, Ruchika Bajaj, Alin Khaliduzzaman Current Medical Research and Opinion.2024; 40(6): 1047. CrossRef
Publishing Embargoes and Versions of Preprints: Impact on the Dissemination of Information Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, Maryna Nazarovets Open Information Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Accelerated acceptance time for preprint submissions: a comparative analysis based on PubMed Dan Tian, Xin Liu, Jiang Li Scientometrics.2024; 129(7): 3787. CrossRef
Are Preprints a Threat to the Credibility and Quality of Artificial Intelligence Literature in the ChatGPT Era? A Scoping Review and Qualitative Study Michael Agyemang Adarkwah, A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, Käthe Schneider, Rose Luckin, Michael Thomas, Jonathan Michael Spector International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction.2024; : 1. CrossRef
A perspective on the Center for Open Science (COS) preprint servers J. A. Teixeira da Silva Science Editor and Publisher.2024; 9(1): 86. CrossRef
Post-Publication Review: Evolution of the Scientific Publishing Workflow D. M. Kochetkov Economics of Science.2024; 10(3): 8. CrossRef
Partially or fully (“silently”) withdrawn or retracted Center for Open Science preprints J.A. Teixeira da Silva Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics.2024; 5(4): 290. CrossRef
Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles Sun Huh Neurointervention.2023; 18(1): 2. CrossRef
Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Serhii Nazarovets Open Information Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The rise of preprints in earth sciences Olivier Pourret, Daniel Enrique Ibarra F1000Research.2023; 12: 561. CrossRef
The rise of preprints in earth sciences Olivier Pourret, Daniel Enrique Ibarra F1000Research.2023; 12: 561. CrossRef
Sharing the wealth: a proposal for discipline-based repositories of shared educational resources Ellen Austin Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education.2023; 27(4): 131. CrossRef
The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic Narmin Rzayeva, Susana Oliveira Henriques, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman PeerJ.2023; 11: e15864. CrossRef
An attempt to explain the partial 'silent' withdrawal or retraction of a SAGE Advance preprint Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Publishing Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones, Alejandra Recio Saucedo, Beth Giddins, Robin Haunschild PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291627. CrossRef
Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study Maia Salholz-Hillel, Molly Pugh-Jones, Nicole Hildebrand, Tjada A. Schult, Johannes Schwietering, Peter Grabitz, Benjamin Gregory Carlisle, Ben Goldacre, Daniel Strech, Nicholas J. DeVito BMC Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef