Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Nursing"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors–recommended gender equity policy in nursing journals listed in MEDLINE or PubMed Central: a descriptive study
Eun Jeong Ko, Geum Hee Jeong
Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):33-37.   Published online February 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.328
  • 1,274 View
  • 57 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: The evolving landscape of nursing research emphasizes inclusive representation. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established guidelines to ensure the fair representation of various demographic variables, including age, sex, and ethnicity. This study aimed to evaluate the adherence of nursing journals indexed in MEDLINE or PubMed Central to the ICMJE’s directives on gender equity, given that journals indexed in MEDLINE and PubMed Central typically adhere to the ICMJE’s guidelines.
Methods
A descriptive literature review methodology was employed to analyze 160 nursing journals listed in two databases as of July 28, 2023. The website of each journal was searched, and the most recent original article from each was selected. These articles were then evaluated for their alignment with the ICMJE guidelines on gender equity. Descriptive statistics were applied to categorize and enumerate the cases.
Results
Of the articles reviewed from 160 journals, 115 dealt with human populations. Of these, 93 required a description of gender equity. Within this subset, 83 articles distinguished between the genders of human subjects. Gender-based interpretations were provided in 15 articles, while another 68 did not offer an interpretation of differences by gender. Among the 10 articles that did not delineate gender, only two provided a rationale for this omission.
Conclusion
Among recent articles published in the nursing journals indexed in MEDLINE and PubMed Central, only 16.1% presented clear gender analyses. These findings highlight the need for editors to strengthen their dedication to gender equity within their editorial policies.
Research trends on resilience related to nursing and patients: a bibliometric analysis
Sukwon Hahn, Young Mi Ryu
Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):44-54.   Published online January 25, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.322
  • 1,276 View
  • 88 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: Resilience is an essential concept used to describe the ability to cope and adapt effectively in the face of loss, hardship, or adversity by patients, nurses, and nursing students. The purpose of this study was to identify research trends on resilience related to nursing and patients.
Methods
The Web of Science Core Collection database was searched on February 21, 2023, with the terms “resilienc*” in the title and “nurs* and “patient* in the topic. A total of 361 documents were extracted. A web-based analysis in R prepared using web-r.org was used to generate visualizations of publishing trends, journal ranks, authorship analysis, the most prolific nations, author collaboration patterns, a KeyWords Plus analysis, trend themes, and the most cited articles.
Results
Research reports on resilience related to nursing and patients were first published in 2007 and have shown a substantial increase since 2019, with more than 30 publications per year. The largest amount of related literature was published in the Journal of Nursing Management, and the Journal of Advanced Nursing included the largest number of citations. Rushton CH was the most prolific author, with six publications, and she was the author of the most cited study. The most productive country was the United States. The most frequently encountered KeyWords Plus terms were “burnout,” “stress,” and “health.”
Conclusion
The findings of this study can offer information to future researchers as well as the opportunity to conduct more novel studies on resilience in nursing.
Trends in research on clinical reasoning in nursing over the past 20 years: a bibliometric analysis
Sukwon Hahn, Young Mi Ryu
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):112-119.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.276
  • 3,346 View
  • 321 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: Clinical reasoning is an essential component of nursing education. This study aimed to identify the trends in research on clinical reasoning in nursing over a 22-year period.
Methods
The Web of Science Core Collection was used as the target database, with the search terms “clinical reasoning,” “clinical judgement,” and “clinical decision.” The scope of the search included the subject, abstract, author’s keywords, and Keywords Plus for each article. Our literature search included journal articles from 2000 to 2021, with the subject area restricted to nursing. A total of 4,675 articles met the inclusion criteria after the removal of duplicates using digital object identifier. We used bibliometric analyses to conduct quantitative and statistical analyses of publication trends, the journals and countries with the most publications, the most productive authors, the most globally cited documents, and the most frequent keywords.
Results
In nursing, studies related to clinical reasoning have increased significantly since 2000. The most prolific country has been the United States. The journal with the most publications was the Journal of Clinical Nursing. The most productive author was Considine J, with 23 publications. The most widely cited author was Tanner CA, with 614 citations. The most frequent keywords in the literature related to clinical reasoning were “care,” “nurses,” and “decision-making,” in that order.
Conclusion
This study examined the quantitative analysis and statistics of publications related to clinical reasoning in nursing in the past 20 years using bibliographic information. This study can help guide future research on clinical reasoning for nurse educators.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic analysis on real estate finance literature: A study on articles in Web of Science Core Collection Database
    Nurgün KOMŞUOĞLU YILMAZ
    Business Economics and Management Research Journal.2023; 6(1): 57.     CrossRef
A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research published in nursing journals
Juyeon Oh, Aekyung Kim
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):118-124.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.205
  • 7,320 View
  • 284 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents.
Methods
The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done.
Results
An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n = 18) and the USA (n = 53), respectively. Original articles (n = 27, 21.6%) and review papers (n = 4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n = 51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n = 73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n = 2), nurses’ psychosocial status (n = 2), nursing research methodology (n = 1), nursing guidelines (n = 4), and protection for nurses (n = 1).
Conclusion
This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS
    Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, José Ángel Rodríguez-Gómez, María Mercedes Novo-Muñoz, Natalia Rodríguez-Novo, Yurena M. Rodríguez-Novo, Carlos-Enrique Martínez-Alberto
    Nursing Reports.2024; 14(2): 655.     CrossRef
  • An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization
    Arslan Sheikh, Nadeem Siddique, Saima Qutab, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood
    Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Community-based tourism in East Asia: A bibliometric research note
    Aaron Tham, Shirley Wei Lee Chin
    Tourism and Hospitality Research.2023; 23(3): 459.     CrossRef
  • Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea
    Sunhee Park, Sumi Oh
    Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2022; 62: e69.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers
    Nosrat Riahinia, Farshid Danesh, Somayeh GhaviDel
    Library Hi Tech.2022; 40(2): 454.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic
    Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 879.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method
    Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş
    Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(6): 1892.     CrossRef
  • Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
    Mona Farouk Ali
    Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083.     CrossRef
  • Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus
    Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927.     CrossRef
  • Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis
    Shaher H. Zyoud, Ahed H. Zyoud
    Environment, Development and Sustainability.2021; 23(6): 8895.     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020
    Leonardo B. Furstenau, Bruna Rabaioli, Michele Kremer Sott, Danielli Cossul, Mariluza Sott Bender, Eduardo Moreno Júdice De Mattos Farina, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Priscilla Paola Severo, Michael S. Dohan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(3): 952.     CrossRef
  • Nursing Challenges in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Era
    Jeung-Im Kim, Mi Yu
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021
    Kyung Won Kim, Geume Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • The nature of rapid response to COVID-19 in Latin America: an examination of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico
    Janaina Pamplona da Costa, André Luiz Sica de Campos, Paulo Roberto Cintra, Liz Felix Greco, Johan Hendrik Poker
    Online Information Review.2021; 45(4): 729.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Nursing Research in the Web of Science
    Gregorio Jesús Alcalá-Albert, María Elena Parra-González
    Education Sciences.2021; 11(9): 455.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research – a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database
    Tosin Yinka Akintunde, Shaojun Chen, Taha Hussein Musa, Felix Oluseyi Amoo, Adekunle Adedeji, Elhakim Ibrahim, Angwi Enow Tassang, Idriss Hussein Musa, Hassan Hussein Musa
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2021; 17(11): 3887.     CrossRef
  • Visibility, collaboration and impact of the Cuban scientific output on COVID-19 in Scopus
    Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Frank Hernández-García, Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo, Christian R. Mejia
    Heliyon.2021; : e08258.     CrossRef
  • A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GREEN PRODUCTIVITY CONCEPT
    Erdinc KOC, Ahmed İhsan ŞİMŞEK
    İşletme Bilimi Dergisi.2021; 9(3): 393.     CrossRef
  • The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics
    Nana Liu, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare
    Oeconomia Copernicana.2021; 12(2): 217.     CrossRef
  • COVID-19 and publishing
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing