KCSE
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Article
- Subject area mapping of Indonesian journals from GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index) databases: a descriptive study
- Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Arseto Satriyo Nugroho
- Sci Ed. 2025;12(2):175-182. Published online August 7, 2025
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.382
- 1,673 View
- 63 Download
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material - Purpose
Studies examining the subject coverage of journals within databases are crucial for scholars and researchers seeking appropriate venues for their articles. This study investigates the characteristics of Indonesian journals by subject area, as listed in GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index), the leading Indonesian journal databases, thereby addressing the need for mapping journal subject areas within a specific national context.
Methods
We employed web mining techniques to collect records from 26,726 journals listed in GARUDA and 13,522 accredited journals from SINTA. Four aspects were analyzed: the breadth of subjects covered by each journal, the number of journals in each subject area, relationships among covered subjects, and the top publisher with the largest number of journals.
Results
Most subject area information was available on both databases. Our analysis revealed that journals in GARUDA exhibited a broader range and coverage of subject areas than those in SINTA, with a median of two subjects per journal in GARUDA versus one in SINTA. Indonesian single-subject journals were predominantly focused on “education,” “social,” and “economy,” while multiarea journals most frequently combined subsets such as {“science,” “engineering”}, {“education,” “social”}, and {“education,” “social,” “humanities”}. Universitas Negeri Semarang, a higher education institution, emerged as a leading publisher with a diverse portfolio of journals across subject areas.
Conclusion
This study presents a subject area map of Indonesian journals and underscores the critical role of higher education institutions in publishing across all subject areas. The findings illustrate the diversity and interrelationships among journal subject areas, providing a foundation for future research on their influence on journal impact, author diversity, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
Case Study
- The promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, from 2018 to 2024: a descriptive study
- Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Raka Sindu Wardoyo
- Sci Ed. 2025;12(1):43-49. Published online February 5, 2025
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.353
- 3,350 View
- 105 Download
- 2 Web of Science
- 2 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- This study explores the promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP), Indonesia, between 2018 and 2024. UNDIP managed 178 active journals spanning various subjects across 13 faculties. The analysis focused on four key indicators: the number of journals accredited by the Akreditasi Jurnal Nasional (ARJUNA), the accreditation grade in the Science and Technology Index (SINTA) database, the number of journals indexed in Scopus, and the number of abstract views and article downloads. Data collection involved searching literature databases, including SINTA and Scopus, and tracking hits and downloads on the web server. The findings indicate that the number of active journals increased from 136 in 2018 to 178 in 2024, with an average annual growth of 7 journals. The mentoring programs at UNDIP led to significant achievements in key performance indicators, with 106.5% of journals becoming accredited and 112.2% being indexed in Scopus. The annual growth rates for accredited and Scopus-indexed journals were 9.33 and 0.83, respectively. Additionally, the cumulative number of abstract views and article downloads increased by 47.14 million annually, attracting visitors from a broad range of countries. The mentoring programs and robust infrastructure at UNDIP have likely played crucial roles in enhancing the promotion and performance of the university’s journals, which are vital for journal promotion and the achievement of key performance indicators.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Open access adoption, quartile mobility, and publisher growth among Scopus-indexed journals in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Asia, 2015–2024: a bibliometric study
Eungi Kim, Da-Yeong Jeong, Seugki Lee
Science Editing.2026; 13(1): 29. CrossRef - Standards, ethics, and digital systems in Indonesian scientific journal governance: a thematic analysis of policy documents
Irwansyah
Science Editing.2026; 13(1): 36. CrossRef
- Open access adoption, quartile mobility, and publisher growth among Scopus-indexed journals in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Asia, 2015–2024: a bibliometric study
Original Articles
- Current status and demand for educational activities on publication ethics by academic organizations in Korea: a descriptive study
- Yera Hur, Cheol-Heui Yun
- Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):64-70. Published online February 16, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.298
- 5,800 View
- 240 Download
- 1 Web of Science
- 1 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Purpose
This study aimed to examine the following overarching issues: the current status of research and publication ethics training conducted in Korean academic organizations and what needs to be done to reinforce research and publication ethics training.
Methods
A survey with 12 items was examined in a pilot survey, followed by a main survey that was distributed to 2,487 academic organizations. A second survey, which contained six additional questions, was dispatched to the same subjects. The results of each survey were analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, content analysis, and comparative analysis.
Results
More than half of the academic organizations provided research and publication ethics training programs, with humanities and social sciences organizations giving more training than the others (χ2=11.190, df=2, P=0.004). The results showed that research and publication ethics training was held mostly once and less than an hour per year, mainly in a lecture format. No significant difference was found in the training content among academic fields. The academic organizations preferred case-based discussion training methods and wanted expert instructors who could give tailored training with examples.
Conclusion
A systematic training program that can develop ethics instructors tailored to specific academic fields and financial support from academic organizations can help scholarly editors resolve the apparent gap between the real and the ideal in ethics training, and ultimately to achieve the competency needed to train their own experts. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Influence of artificial intelligence and chatbots on research integrity and publication ethics
Payam Hosseinzadeh Kasani, Kee Hyun Cho, Jae-Won Jang, Cheol-Heui Yun
Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 12. CrossRef
- Influence of artificial intelligence and chatbots on research integrity and publication ethics
- Status and factors associated with the adoption of data sharing policies in Asian journals
- Jihyun Kim, Seo Young Bai
- Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):97-104. Published online August 19, 2022
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.274
- 7,511 View
- 324 Download
- 5 Web of Science
- 5 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
This study investigated the current status and factors associated with adopting data sharing policies in Asian journals. Data sharing policies vary by country and region, and few studies have examined the trends and factors related to these policies in journals across the Asian region.
Methods
The 2020 Scimago Journal and Country Rank was used to download data about 1,143 Asian journals indexed in Web of Science. Excluding 40 journals inaccessible via the Internet or without English-language websites and author guidelines, 1,103 journals were analyzed through descriptive statistical analyses and the chi-square test.
Results
Of the 1,103 journals, 325 (29.5%) had data sharing policies, showing a moderate level of policy adoption among Asian journals. The results of the chi-square test suggested that the impact factor and publisher type (whether a publisher was commercial) were significantly associated with the presence of data sharing policies in journals, but subject categories were not identified as a significant factor. Regarding the strength of data sharing policies, most journals provided policies that only encouraged data sharing.
Conclusion
Policies only encouraging data sharing are unlikely to lead to actual data sharing; thus, considering varying levels of policy strength and effective ways to induce authors’ compliance with the policies is important. Further research needs to examine other factors affecting the presence or strength of data sharing policies. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Open science indicator compliance by Spanish scientific journals
María Ángeles Coslado, Daniela De Filippo, Elías Sanz-Casado
Journal of Data and Information Science.2025; 10(4): 219. CrossRef - Academic journal website from the user’s perspective
A. V. Silnichaya, D. I. Trushkov, A. Volkova, M. S. Konyaev
Science Editor and Publisher.2024; 9(1): 2. CrossRef - Analyzing AI use policy in LIS: association with journal metrics and publisher volume
Eungi Kim
Scientometrics.2024; 129(12): 7623. CrossRef - Analyzing Data Sharing Policies in Library and Information Science: Journal Metrics, Open Access Status, and Publisher Volume
Eungi Kim, Kristine Joy Tabogoc, Jang Won Chae
Publications.2024; 12(4): 39. CrossRef - Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3. CrossRef
- Open science indicator compliance by Spanish scientific journals
- Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions
- Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):130-135. Published online August 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.207
- 12,063 View
- 196 Download
- 7 Web of Science
- 6 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Purpose
This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Methods
We analyzed peer review systems and criteria for peer review in nine data journals indexed by Web of Science, as well as the positions of the editorial committee members of the journals. Each data journal’s website was initially surveyed, and the editors-in-chief were queried via email about any information not found on the websites. The peer review criteria of the journals were analyzed in terms of data quality, metadata quality, and general quality.
Results
Seven of the nine data journals adopted single-blind and open review peer review methods. The remaining two implemented modified models, such as interactive and community review. In the peer review criteria, there was a shared emphasis on the appropriateness of data production methodology and detailed descriptions. The editorial committees of the journals tended to have subject editors or subject advisory boards, while a few journals included positions with the responsibility of evaluating the technical quality of data.
Conclusion
Creating a community of subject experts and securing various editorial positions for peer review are necessary for data journals to achieve data quality assurance and to promote reuse. New practices will emerge in terms of data peer review models, criteria, and editorial positions, and further research needs to be conducted. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- What Are Journals and Reviewers Concerned About in Data Papers? Evidence From Journal Guidelines and Review Reports
Xinyu Wang, Lei Xu
Learned Publishing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Peer review of data papers: Does it achieve expectations for facilitating data sharing and reuse?
Chenyue Jiao, Peter T. Darch
Journal of Information Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Unleashing the power of AI in science-key considerations for materials data preparation
Yongchao Lu, Hong Wang, Lanting Zhang, Ning Yu, Siqi Shi, Hang Su
Scientific Data.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Dissemination effect of data papers on scientific datasets
Hong Jiao, Yuhong Qiu, Xiaowei Ma, Bo Yang
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(2): 115. CrossRef - The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts
Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 73(6): 834. CrossRef - Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef
- What Are Journals and Reviewers Concerned About in Data Papers? Evidence From Journal Guidelines and Review Reports
- A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research published in nursing journals
- Juyeon Oh, Aekyung Kim
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):118-124. Published online August 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.205
- 11,864 View
- 319 Download
- 26 Web of Science
- 26 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents.
Methods
The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done.
Results
An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n = 18) and the USA (n = 53), respectively. Original articles (n = 27, 21.6%) and review papers (n = 4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n = 51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n = 73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n = 2), nurses’ psychosocial status (n = 2), nursing research methodology (n = 1), nursing guidelines (n = 4), and protection for nurses (n = 1).
Conclusion
This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Profiling of Malaysian and global scientific research on COVID-19
Yanti Idaya Aspura Mohd Khalid, Siti Wahida Amanullah, Mike Thelwall
Data Science and Informetrics.2025; 5(3): 172. CrossRef - Description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS
Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, José Ángel Rodríguez-Gómez, María Mercedes Novo-Muñoz, Natalia Rodríguez-Novo, Yurena M. Rodríguez-Novo, Carlos-Enrique Martínez-Alberto
Nursing Reports.2024; 14(2): 655. CrossRef - Characteristics and quality of reporting qualitative nursing research related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic search and critical review
Ian-In Vong, Monique Rothan-Tondeur, Rita Georges Nohra
BMC Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on COVID-19 in the Transportation Industry: An Early Study
Harun Karakavuz, Nilüfer Canöz, Ahmet Ertek
Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi.2024; 7(2): 102. CrossRef - An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization
Arslan Sheikh, Nadeem Siddique, Saima Qutab, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(1): 3. CrossRef - Community-based tourism in East Asia: A bibliometric research note
Aaron Tham, Shirley Wei Lee Chin
Tourism and Hospitality Research.2023; 23(3): 459. CrossRef - Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea
Sunhee Park, Sumi Oh
Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2022; 62: e69. CrossRef - Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers
Nosrat Riahinia, Farshid Danesh, Somayeh GhaviDel
Library Hi Tech.2022; 40(2): 454. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic
Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 879. CrossRef - A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method
Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş
Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(6): 1892. CrossRef - Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
Mona Farouk Ali
Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083. CrossRef - Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus
Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927. CrossRef - Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis
Shaher H. Zyoud, Ahed H. Zyoud
Environment, Development and Sustainability.2021; 23(6): 8895. CrossRef - A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020
Leonardo B. Furstenau, Bruna Rabaioli, Michele Kremer Sott, Danielli Cossul, Mariluza Sott Bender, Eduardo Moreno Júdice De Mattos Farina, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Priscilla Paola Severo, Michael S. Dohan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(3): 952. CrossRef - Nursing Challenges in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Era
Jeung-Im Kim, Mi Yu
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 1. CrossRef - Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021
Kyung Won Kim, Geume Hee Jeong
Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 47. CrossRef - The nature of rapid response to COVID-19 in Latin America: an examination of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico
Janaina Pamplona da Costa, André Luiz Sica de Campos, Paulo Roberto Cintra, Liz Felix Greco, Johan Hendrik Poker
Online Information Review.2021; 45(4): 729. CrossRef - Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Nursing Research in the Web of Science
Gregorio Jesús Alcalá-Albert, María Elena Parra-González
Education Sciences.2021; 11(9): 455. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research – a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database
Tosin Yinka Akintunde, Shaojun Chen, Taha Hussein Musa, Felix Oluseyi Amoo, Adekunle Adedeji, Elhakim Ibrahim, Angwi Enow Tassang, Idriss Hussein Musa, Hassan Hussein Musa
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2021; 17(11): 3887. CrossRef - Visibility, collaboration and impact of the Cuban scientific output on COVID-19 in Scopus
Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Frank Hernández-García, Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo, Christian R. Mejia
Heliyon.2021; : e08258. CrossRef - A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GREEN PRODUCTIVITY CONCEPT
Erdinc KOC, Ahmed İhsan ŞİMŞEK
İşletme Bilimi Dergisi.2021; 9(3): 393. CrossRef - The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics
Nana Liu, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare
Oeconomia Copernicana.2021; 12(2): 217. CrossRef - COVID-19 and publishing
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109. CrossRef - Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44. CrossRef
- Profiling of Malaysian and global scientific research on COVID-19
- Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
- Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):24-33. Published online February 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.186
- 10,593 View
- 154 Download
- 9 Web of Science
- 10 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
The “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” are of increasing importance in an open science environment as a way to increase the transparency and quality of academic society journals. However, little previous research has investigated the application of this new guideline in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree to which this guideline is being applied by Korean academic society– published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports.
Methods
The researchers investigated the homepages of 59 Korean academic society– published journals to evaluate whether they had adopted the 33 items listed in the guideline. Based on the information available on the journals’ homepages, each item was classified as ‘yes’ or ‘no’ within the four categories of basic journal information, publication ethics, copyright and archiving information, and profit model.
Results
The basic journal information category was generally well-practiced, with the exceptions of the peer review process, readership, and author fees. The copyright and licensing information category was also well-practiced, with the exception of policies on posting accepted articles with third parties and archiving items. However, most items in the publication ethics category were not well practiced, with the exception of authorship and intellectual property. All items in the profit model category were infrequently implemented.
Conclusion
These findings serve as a good indicator for Korean journal editors of areas for improvement. It may be helpful to review journals’ publication policies and homepages to comply with international publishing standards. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Транспарентность в научных журналах по био- и пищевым технологиям: сравнительный анализ редакционных политик на основе принципов COPE, OASPA, WAME и DOAJ
М. А. Косычева
Научный редактор и издатель.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef - Conformity with Publication Ethics Guidelines among Nigerian Medical Journals
Adaora A Onyiaorah, Euzebus C Ezugwu
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.2025; 20(4): 250. CrossRef - The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa
ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef - The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Maryam Zarghani, Leila Nemati-Anaraki, Shahram Sedghi, Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, Anisa Rowhani-Farid
Libri.2023; 73(2): 167. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh
Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef - Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
Sun Huh
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef - How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh
Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef
- Транспарентность в научных журналах по био- и пищевым технологиям: сравнительный анализ редакционных политик на основе принципов COPE, OASPA, WAME и DOAJ
- An analysis of data paper templates and guidelines: types of contextual information described by data journals
- Jihyun Kim
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):16-23. Published online February 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.185
- 11,314 View
- 253 Download
- 13 Web of Science
- 16 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Data papers are a promising genre of scholarly communication, in which research data are described, shared, and published. Rich documentation of data, including adequate contextual information, enhances the potential of data reuse. This study investigated the extent to which the components of data papers specified by journals represented the types of contextual information necessary for data reuse.
Methods
A content analysis of 15 data paper templates/guidelines from 24 data journals indexed by the Web of Science was performed. A coding scheme was developed based on previous studies, consisting of four categories: general data set properties, data production information, repository information, and reuse information.
Results
Only a few types of contextual information were commonly requested by the journals. Except data format information and file names, general data set properties were specified less often than other categories of contextual information. Researchers were frequently asked to provide data production information, such as information on the data collection, data producer, and related project. Repository information focused on data identifiers, while information about repository reputation and curation practices was rarely requested. Reuse information mostly involved advice on the reuse of data and terms of use.
Conclusion
These findings imply that data journals should provide a more standardized set of data paper components to inform reusers of relevant contextual information in a consistent manner. Information about repository reputation and curation could also be provided by data journals to complement the repository information provided by the authors of data papers and to help researchers evaluate the reusability of data. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Curated Editorial Infrastructures: Balancing Rigor And Reach With Generative AI
Diego Alexander Quevedo Piratova
Journal of Leadership Studies.2026;[Epub] CrossRef - On the Readiness of Scientific Data Papers for a Fair and Transparent Use in Machine Learning
Joan Giner-Miguelez, Abel Gómez, Jordi Cabot
Scientific Data.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Defining geosciences research data through metadata reuse:
Alexandre Ribas Semeler, Luana Farias Sales, Adilson Luiz Pinto, Roberta Pereira da Silva de Paula, Valquer Cleyton Paes Gandra , Heloisa Costa
Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2025; (87): e009. CrossRef - What Are Journals and Reviewers Concerned About in Data Papers? Evidence From Journal Guidelines and Review Reports
Xinyu Wang, Lei Xu
Learned Publishing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Peer review of data papers: Does it achieve expectations for facilitating data sharing and reuse?
Chenyue Jiao, Peter T. Darch
Journal of Information Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Dissemination effect of data papers on scientific datasets
Hong Jiao, Yuhong Qiu, Xiaowei Ma, Bo Yang
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2024; 75(2): 115. CrossRef - Spectral Library of Plant Species from Montesinho Natural Park in Portugal
Isabel Pôças, Cátia Rodrigues de Almeida, Salvador Arenas-Castro, João C. Campos, Nuno Garcia, João Alírio, Neftalí Sillero, Ana C. Teodoro
Data.2024; 9(5): 65. CrossRef - Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141. CrossRef - The data paper as a sociolinguistic epistemic object: A content analysis on the rhetorical moves used in data paper abstracts
Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 73(6): 834. CrossRef - A Preliminary Analysis of Geography of Collaboration in Data Papers by S&T Capacity Index
Pei‐Ying Chen, Kai Li, Chenyue Jiao
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2022; 59(1): 642. CrossRef - Taxonomy 2.0: computer-aided identification tools to assist Antarctic biologists in the field and in the laboratory
Thomas Saucède, Marc Eléaume, Quentin Jossart, Camille Moreau, Rachel Downey, Narissa Bax, Chester Sands, Borja Mercado, Cyril Gallut, Régine Vignes-Lebbe
Antarctic Science.2021; 33(1): 39. CrossRef - Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim
Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - A Survey of Exclusively Data Journals and How They Are Indexed by Scientific Databases
Kai Li, Chuyi Lu, Chenyue Jiao
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2021; 58(1): 771. CrossRef - Three-stage publishing to support evidence-based management practice
Juan A. Marin-Garcia
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management.2021; 12(2): 56. CrossRef - The role of the data paper in scholarly communication
Chenyue Jiao, Peter T. Darch
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
- Curated Editorial Infrastructures: Balancing Rigor And Reach With Generative AI
Review
- History of the Scopus Expert Content Selection and Advisory Committee of Korea
- Hyungsun Kim
- Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):6-10. Published online February 20, 2020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.183
- 8,475 View
- 122 Download
- 2 Web of Science
- 2 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- With the objective of improving the quality of Korean journals and elevating them to international standards, the National Research Foundation of Korea, in consultation with Elsevier, formed the Scopus Expert Content Selection and Advisory Committee-Korea (ECSAC-Korea) as a local selection committee in August 2012. The committee reviews Korean journals for Scopus indexing and recommends them to the Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board. In September 2019, ECSAC-Korea became part of the Korean Council of Science Editors (KCSE). This article describes the current status of Scopus indexing in Korea and the history, organizational structure, and role of ECSAC-Korea as part of the KCSE. The article also introduces the members of ECSAC-Korea and the KCSE steering committee for Scopus ECSAC-Korea, who have been active since September 2019.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Training Material
- How to archive scholarly journals from the Republic of Korea in the National Library of Korea
- Sun Huh
- Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):171-174. Published online August 19, 2019
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.180
- 7,278 View
- 117 Download
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- According to the policies of a number of indexing database agencies and the Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing 3rd version, archiving of scholarly journal articles is mandatory for editors and publishers. Furthermore, publishers in Korea have been required to deposit journal article files in the National Library of Korea since February 2016 by law. This study presents background information on archiving sites and how to deposit digital files in the Library’s archive. Although some archiving sites for scholarly journals have been developed internationally, it may be burdensome for publishers in Korea (almost all of which are academic societies) to use those sites to deposit digital files because a deposit fee is required by some agencies. Furthermore, PubMed Central, maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine, accepts only English-language biomedical journals. In contrast, it is possible for publishers to deposit articles in the National Library of Korea by uploading files without any fees, regardless of the journal language. Furthermore, publishers can select the access policy of their journals. All journal publishers and editors in Korea are recommended to utilize the archiving site of the National Library of Korea to preserve their journal articles.
Original Articles
- Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
- Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
- Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):112-121. Published online August 19, 2019
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.171
- 10,359 View
- 155 Download
- 14 Web of Science
- 18 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Four international associations, including the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and the World Association of Medical Editors declared the third version of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” to ensure transparency and quality in journal publications. This study is aimed at assessing the guidelines from the journals’ websites manually.
Methods
In this study, three researchers investigate the homepages of 781 academic society-published journals that are registered in the Science Citation Index Expanded and whether these journals are effectively adopting these new guidelines. In this paper, 33 items from the guidelines are examined. The 33 items are rearranged into four different categories: basic journal information; publication ethics; copyright and archiving information; and profit model. The researchers count yes or no after checking the adopting status on the journal homepage and dividing into four scales: 0% to 25% for is rarely practiced, 26% to 50% for is poorly practiced, 51% to 75% for is adequately practiced, and 76% to 100% for is well practiced.
Results
Of the 33 items, 10 are found to be poorly or rarely practiced, including readership, data sharing, archiving policies, and profit model information.
Conclusion
It could be the most up-to-date indicator of the current status of applying best practice guidelines. Society journal editors especially from Asia should evaluate their journals regarding “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing”. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The NIAID Discovery Portal: a unified search engine for infectious and immune-mediated disease datasets
Ginger Tsueng, Emily Bullen, Candice Czech, Dylan Welzel, Leandro Collares, Jason Lin, Everaldo Rodolpho, Zubair Qazi, Nichollette Acosta, Lisa M. Mayer, Sudha Venkatachari, Zorana Mitrović Vučičević, Poromendro N. Burman, Deepti Jain, Jack DiGiovanna, Ma
mSystems.2026;[Epub] CrossRef - Транспарентность в научных журналах по био- и пищевым технологиям: сравнительный анализ редакционных политик на основе принципов COPE, OASPA, WAME и DOAJ
М. А. Косычева
Научный редактор и издатель.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef - Conformity with Publication Ethics Guidelines among Nigerian Medical Journals
Adaora A Onyiaorah, Euzebus C Ezugwu
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.2025; 20(4): 250. CrossRef - Opening up to the open data
Prakash K. Dubey
Journal of Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences.2024; 10(1): 1. CrossRef - The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa
ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef - Journal Data Accessibility Policies: Challenges and Opportunities
Elena V. Tikhonova, Marina A. Kosycheva
Health, Food & Biotechnology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Prestige of scholarly book publishers—An investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries
Eleonora Dagienė
Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 356. CrossRef - The use of data repositories in dermatology
Umer Nadir, Loma Dave, Michael D. Yi, Farhana Ikmal Hisham, Murad Alam
Archives of Dermatological Research.2023; 315(6): 1851. CrossRef - Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321. CrossRef - Cumplimiento de Estándares Internacionales en Publicaciones Arbitradas Académicas Mexicanas y Guatemaltecas
Humberto Emilio Aguilera Arévalo
Revista Académica Sociedad del Conocimiento Cunzac.2022; 2(1): 89. CrossRef - Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals
Brian Jackson
Publications.2021; 9(2): 25. CrossRef - Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
Sun Huh
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641. CrossRef - The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef - Changes in bibliographic information associated with Korean scientific journals from 2011 to 2019
Yoon Joo Seo, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 11. CrossRef - Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in Korean academic society-published journals listed in Journal Citation Reports
Ye Jin Choi, Hyung Wook Choi, Soon Kim
Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 24. CrossRef - Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
Sun Huh
Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238. CrossRef - How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
Sun Huh
Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353. CrossRef - Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
Sun Huh
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493. CrossRef
- The NIAID Discovery Portal: a unified search engine for infectious and immune-mediated disease datasets
- Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals
- Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi
- Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):41-46. Published online February 20, 2019
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.154
- 10,950 View
- 173 Download
- 5 Web of Science
- 6 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
This study aims to analyze the digital standards of Asian journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) which has been recognized as an index of quality for open access journals.
Methods
Data including 54 fields of each journal listed in DOAJ were provided by the DOAJ team in June 5, 2018. We focused on 11 fields including digital standards, content licensing types and digital archiving policy.
Results
Based on raw data from DOAJ from June 5, 2018, there are 11,534 journals registered in the directory. Among all journals in the directory, Asian journals comprise 1,972 journals from 18 countries. Indonesian journals rank at the top for Asian journals, with 1,322 journals originating from that country. Other major Asian countries’ registration status includes India (238), South Korea (82), China (80), Malaysia (45), Pakistan (39), Taiwan (30), Thailand (27), Japan (20), and Hong Kong (20). Eighty percent of journals (1,584) are using PDF-only as their full-text format, and DOI is adopted in 852 journals (43%). Almost 98% of journals (1,936) are having a Creative Commons license; however, 85% of journals (1,689) do not have a digital archiving policy.
Conclusion
Generally, digital standards are well implemented in South Korea, and digital archiving/deposit policy is well accepted in Indian journals. Many Asian open access journal editors can refer to this study result when they digitalize their journals in order to meet global standards. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Perceptions of the Pakistani editors for open access journal publishing: a developing country’s perspective
Muhammad Zahid Raza, Muhammad Rafiq, Saira Hanif Soroya
Information Development.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Salim Moussa
ETHICS IN PROGRESS.2024; 15(1): 130. CrossRef - Türkiye'de Açık Dergi Sistemlerinde Yayımlanan Kütüphane ve Bilgi Bilim Dergilerinin Dijital Koruma Durumu: Fatcat Tabanlı Bir Analiz
Kemal Yayla
Bilgi Yönetimi.2024; 7(2): 252. CrossRef - Digital Archiving Policies of Central European Journals Registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals
Branka Marijanović, Hrvoje Stančić
Libri.2023; 73(1): 11. CrossRef - Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
Younsang Cho
Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 162. CrossRef - Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112. CrossRef
- Perceptions of the Pakistani editors for open access journal publishing: a developing country’s perspective
Review
- Quality open access publishing and registration to Directory of Open Access Journals
- Xin Bi
- Sci Ed. 2017;4(1):3-11. Published online February 20, 2017
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.82
- 24,061 View
- 334 Download
- 12 Web of Science
- 11 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- With the fast development of open access publishing worldwide, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) as a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals, has been recognized for its high criteria in facilitating high quality open access scholarly publishing and used as the portal for accessing quality open access journals. While the numbers of journal application to be inclusion in DOAJ in Asia are kept increasing dramatically, many editors of these journals are not very clear about the idea or concept of the open access which have been embedded in the application form containing 58 questions falling into several different criteria categories. The very commonly seen misunderstanding of the required item, inaccurate or vague or incomplete and even missing information, poorly organized website, non-transparent process of publishing, especially no open access statement and copyright statement, or conflicts between the policy statements would cause much more communication between the reviewer and the editor and delay the completion of the review. This article gives an in depth introduction to DOAJ criteria and detailed introduction to the general process on how to register to DOAJ, suggestions based on application review also is given for journal editors to better prepare for this application. And it is the most important for editors to keep in mind that to be indexed by DOAJ is not just about filling a form, it is about truly change and adapt to best practices in open access publishing.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Ewha Medical Journal passed the scientific evaluation by PubMed Central and succeeded in being included in DOAJ, but failed to be accepted by Scopus
Sun Huh
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(2): e21. CrossRef - Mapping the open access publications of Indian non-profit organizations over the last 20 years based on OpenAlex insights
Rima Hazarika, Abhijit Roy, K.G. Sudhier
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - An Altmetrics and citation analysis of selected predatory journals in library and information science field
Ming Chen, Linzi Wang
The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2022; 48(6): 102618. CrossRef - Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility
Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez, Emilio Abad-Segura, Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, Valentín Molina-Moreno
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4729. CrossRef - Mapping the Current Research Agenda on Scholarly Publishing: Scopus-Indexed Reviews
Elena Tikhonova, Lilia Raitskaya
Journal of Language and Education.2020; 6(4): 4. CrossRef - Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape
Serhii Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Maryna Nazarovets
The Journal of Academic Librarianship.2019; 45(1): 9. CrossRef - Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - The DOAJ Spring Cleaning 2016 and What Was Removed—Tragic Loss or Good Riddance?
Jan Erik Frantsvåg
Publications.2019; 7(3): 45. CrossRef - How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
Sun Huh
Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95. CrossRef -
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67. CrossRef - Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef
- Ewha Medical Journal passed the scientific evaluation by PubMed Central and succeeded in being included in DOAJ, but failed to be accepted by Scopus
Training Materials
- Scientific, technical, and medical podcasting in Korea
- Harvey E. Schmidt
- Sci Ed. 2016;3(1):43-48. Published online February 19, 2016
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.62
- 14,142 View
- 135 Download
- 4 Web of Science
- 4 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Korean produced scientific, technical and medical (STM) podcasts represent an opportunity for Korean STM publications to further promote themselves as an important center for scientific research. STM Publishing makes results and data available to the greater scientific community as well as the rigors of metadata research. Publishing costs should be considered part of research costs since research results are only of value if published in reputable peer-reviewed journals. Korean journals indexed in the Korean Citation Index (KCI) continue to evolve in quality and as important communities for scientists. Universities, tertiary hospitals, and research institutes throughout Europe and America feature podcasts as an integral part of Web 2.0 and the evolution of e-publishing. However, unlike their Western counterparts, Korean (as well as Chinese and Japanese) STM publications and related organizations have not established hosted STM podcast programs to help propagate and create discussion on important science results. The opportunity of Korean produced STM podcasts to highlight important research and discovery is a cost efficient opportunity that Korean journals, universities, tertiary hospitals, research institutes and industry/academic collaborations should consider. This paper outlines roles, reasons and rational for KCI publications to be featured in a Korean hosted STM podcast.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Contribuições do formato podcast para a divulgação científica em universidades públicas brasileiras
Sara Pires dos Santos, Adriano David Monteiro de Barros, Fernanda Vasques Ferreira
AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento.2025; 14: 1. CrossRef - Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 100. CrossRef - Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef - The great rise ofIntestinal Researchas an international journal 3 years after its language change to English as evidenced by journal metrics
Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Intestinal Research.2017; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
- Contribuições do formato podcast para a divulgação científica em universidades públicas brasileiras
- Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist
- Irene Hames
- Sci Ed. 2016;3(1):36-42. Published online February 19, 2016
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.61
- 54,444 View
- 487 Download
- 3 Web of Science
- 3 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- This is a republication of Appendix 1, The Golden Rules and the Peer-Review Good Practice Checklist, from the author’s book, Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: guidelines for good practice, published in 2007 by Wiley-Blackwell in association with ALPSP (the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers), with the permission of the author and publisher (ISBN: 978-1-4051-3159-9, http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/ productCd-1405131594.html).
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Ten Tips for Performing Your First Peer Review: The Next Step for the Aspiring Academic Plastic Surgeon
Martin Frendø, Andreas Frithioff, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(04): 538. CrossRef - Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue
Miltos K. Lazarides, George S. Georgiadis, Nikolaos Papanas
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds.2020; 19(3): 227. CrossRef - Writing highly effective reviews of a scientific manuscript
Garry J. Scrimgeour, Shelley D. Pruss
Freshwater Science.2016; 35(4): 1076. CrossRef
- Ten Tips for Performing Your First Peer Review: The Next Step for the Aspiring Academic Plastic Surgeon
Original Article
- Analysis of journal attributes of 403 KoreaScience journals from the viewpoint of author
- Sung-Nam Cho, Tae-Sul Seo, Hee-Yoon Choi, Sun-A Park
- Sci Ed. 2016;3(1):19-25. Published online February 19, 2016
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.58
- 16,468 View
- 139 Download
- 2 Web of Science
- 3 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Korea is a country in which journal industry is rapidly increasing recently. KoreaScience is a typical Korean scientific and technical journal database that may be used to analyze Korean journals. A set of journal attributes reflecting the requirements in view of submitting authors was derived and some characteristics of KoreaScience journals such as subject distribution, launch year, publication frequency, publication language, and open access were quantitatively analyzed according to the journal attributes. As a result, it was found that Korean journals are published in almost all subject categories except some subject categories under Physics. The number of journal has been increased rapidly during the period between 1980s and 1990s. Journals published quarterly are 45%. Journals published in English are 31%. Open access journals are 26% while 72% free access.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Temporal characteristics of journals indexed in both KCI and Scopus: analyzing journal age, coverage and journal metrics
Eungi Kim, Madhu Atteraya, Shreejana Gnawali
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Subject area mapping of Indonesian journals from GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index) databases: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Arseto Satriyo Nugroho
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 175. CrossRef - Study on Development of Journal and Article Visualization Services
Sung-Nam Cho, Tae-Sul Seo
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science.2016; 50(2): 183. CrossRef
- Temporal characteristics of journals indexed in both KCI and Scopus: analyzing journal age, coverage and journal metrics
Case Study
- Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges
- Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza
- Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):73-78. Published online August 14, 2015
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.47
- 65,535 View
- 1,149 Download
- 7 Web of Science
- 14 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- As of July 2015, 28 Philippine scientific journals out of 777 Philippine scholarly journals are listed in the master journal lists of Thomson Reuters (TR), Scopus, or both. Of these scientific journals, thirteen are published by universities, two by government institutions, ten by professional organizations and three by private for-profit or non-profit organizations. Nineteen of these journals are over 25 years old, with the Philippine Journal of Science and the Philippine Agricultural Scientist being the oldest at 108 and 103 years in publication, respectively. Scientific journals in the Philippines, like other countries in Asia, face various increasing challenges. Among these challenges are getting listed in the master journal lists and citation databases of TR, Scopus, or both; obtaining funding; reaching a wider readership; attaining higher impact factors; competing for papers; and increased submission of manuscripts from outside the country. To promote the improvement of local journals, the National Academy of Science and Technology Philippines has given outstanding publication awards for scientific papers published in local journals for the past two decades. The Philippine Commission on Higher Education has accredited local journals that are included in either TR and Scopus journal master lists, and provides monetary incentives to accredited journals. Training workshops on scientific article writing and editorial management are conducted for researchers and editors by universities and professional and government organizations. A network of Philippine science editors has been formed to work together to upgrade and modernize selected journals to international standards.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran
Hamid R. Jamali, Majid Nabavi, Mozhgan Oroji, Ebrahim Emrani
Learned Publishing.2026;[Epub] CrossRef - The size of higher education, R&D expenditure, academic documents and international rankings
Liza Lee, Ying-Sing Liu
Social Sciences & Humanities Open.2025; 11: 101189. CrossRef - The Philippine Journal of Anesthesiology is Back… and the Future is in Our Hands
Emmanuel S. Prudente
Philippine Journal of Anesthesiology.2025; 30(1): 2. CrossRef - Ethical Considerations and Challenges Posed by the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Scholarly Publishing
Emeka Ugoala
Trends in Scholarly Publishing.2025; 4(1): 29. CrossRef - Türkiye'de Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Alanında Yayımlanan Üniversite Dergilerinin İncelenmesi
Burak Can Korkmaz, Ahmet Emin Arı
Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi.2025; 42(2): 59. CrossRef - Exploring state and institutional support for sustainable scholarly journal publishing
Maryna Zhenchenko, Olha Dunaievska
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES.2025; 18(3): 144. CrossRef - 75 Years of the Journal Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta and 45 Years of Its Biological Series
G. V. Morgunova, A. N. Khokhlov
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin.2022; 77(1): 1. CrossRef - Mathematical Modeling Research Output Impacting New Technological Development: An Axiomatization to Build Novelty
Mohd Razip Bajuri, Zailan Siri, Mohd Nor Syahrir Abdullah
Axioms.2022; 11(6): 264. CrossRef - Research Productivity among Filipino Neurologists Associated with Socioeconomic, Healthcare, and Disease Burden Factors: A Bibliometric Analysis
Almira Doreen Abigail O. Apor, Roland Dominic G. Jamora
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(23): 15630. CrossRef - Using technology-based tools in ensuring quality of publishable journal articles: the case of Chinese undergraduate research writing experience
Fade Shi
Education and Information Technologies.2021; 26(4): 4203. CrossRef - Possible Scenarios on the Future of Polytechnic State University of Bicol (PSUB) – Research Culture by 2030 using Jim Dator’s Archetypes of Alternative Futures
Romeo Jr. Sotto, Seth Barandon, Juvy Bustamante, April Luzon, Marlon Pontillas, Harold Jan Terano
Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies.2021; 1(2): 40. CrossRef - Compliance of education journals in Vietnam with the minimum criteria to be indexed in the ASEAN Citation Index and Scopus
Trung Tran, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thi Thu Le, Cuong Huu Nguyen, Thuy Phuong La, Trung Tien Nguyen, Hang Thi-Thu Nguyen
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 142. CrossRef - Internal affairs: the fate of authors from the University of the Philippines accused of plagiarism, 1990s to 2010s
Miguel Paolo P. Reyes, Joel F. Ariate
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 128. CrossRef - Reviving a scientific journal: challenges and strategies
Jose Isagani Janairo
Science Editing.2018; 5(1): 59. CrossRef
- Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran
Original Article
- The current status of science journals in Indonesia
- Komang G. Wiryawan
- Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):71-75. Published online August 18, 2014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.71
- 65,535 View
- 335 Download
- 17 Web of Science
- 16 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
Indonesia is the fourth most highly populated country in the world. Every year, there are more than 1.5-million students enrolled into universities across Indonesia. This large number of students is a potential source of scientific publication, as all students are required to publish a paper before they take their final examination. To accommodate this publication demand, good-quality journals need to be established in Indonesia. Therefore, this paper will describe the current status of scientific journals in Indonesia and some other information related to Indonesian scientific journals. The data presented in this article were obtained from the websites of government institutions such as Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Ministry of Education and Culture, and Indonesian Scientific Journal Database. Currently, there are 5,900 scientific journals in Indonesia that are grouped into three classes, namely non-accredited journals (5,579 titles), accredited journals (342 titles), and international journals (16 titles). Most journals are published by universities, faculties, or departments. Other journals are published by research centers and scientific associations. In recent years, the number of journals indexed in Scopus has increased substantially, from only 2 journals before the year 2000 to 16 journals in 2013. In addition, the number of journals registered in the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) increased sharply from 3 titles in 2009 to 109 titles at the end of 2013. In the year 2012, the number of papers published in the abovementioned journals was 145,000, but only 1,314 papers were published internationally. This number is still very low, even when compared to some Southeast Asian countries. To improve the quality of journals and to increase the number of papers published, a high commitment from the government is required, particularly in terms of regulation formulation and funding provision.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- The promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, from 2018 to 2024: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Raka Sindu Wardoyo
Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 43. CrossRef - Subject area mapping of Indonesian journals from GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital) and SINTA (Science Technology Index) databases: a descriptive study
Eko Didik Widianto, Hadiyanto, Teddy Mantoro, Arseto Satriyo Nugroho
Science Editing.2025; 12(2): 175. CrossRef - Charting the Future of Oral Health: A Bibliometric Exploration of Quality-of-Life Research in Dentistry
Agatha Ravi Vidiasratri, Lisdrianto Hanindriyo, Caroline Manuela Hartanto
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2024; 21(3): 249. CrossRef - Improving manuscript quality in Asian science journals to take a leap forward in the next 5 years
Khoerul Umam, Komang G. Wiryawan, Supandi Supandi, Tae-Sul Seo, Eka Nana Susanti, Tirta Anhari
Science Editing.2024; 12(1): 61. CrossRef - Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach
Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher
Journal of Documentation.2022; 78(7): 450. CrossRef - Quality of psychiatry journals published from India: Insights for readers, researchers, and publishers
Samir K. Praharaj, Shahul Ameen, Vikas Menon
Indian Journal of Psychiatry.2022; 64(6): 606. CrossRef - Reproducing Academic Insularity in a Time of Neo-liberal Markets: The Case of Social Science Research in Indonesian State Universities
Inaya Rakhmani
Journal of Contemporary Asia.2021; 51(1): 64. CrossRef - Higher Education with the Most Publication in Focus Area of Basic Science using Frequency Distribution
A Fauzy, L Chabib, Kasam, Mustangimah, F Nurlette
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2020; 448(1): 012076. CrossRef - A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia
Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Suryanto Suryanto, Sinta Ningrum, Ida Widianingsih
Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 177. CrossRef - Economic Modelling of Predatory Journal Publishing
Jingfeng Xia
Publishing Research Quarterly.2019; 35(3): 377. CrossRef - Establishment of the Indonesian Association of Scientific Journal Editors
Komang G. Wiryawan
Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 148. CrossRef - Open access full-text databases in Asian countries
Tae-Sul Seo
Science Editing.2018; 5(1): 26. CrossRef - Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information
overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef - Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
Science Editing.2017; 4(2): 58. CrossRef - A Comparison Between Malay and English Research Article Discussions
Chek Kim Loi, Moyra Sweetnam Evans, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim, Songyut Akkakoson
Sage Open.2016;[Epub] CrossRef - Academic journals and cultural diversity
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2015; 2(1): 1. CrossRef
- The promotion of university journals published by Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, from 2018 to 2024: a descriptive study
Review
- The big picture: scholarly publishing trends 2014
- Pippa Smart
- Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):52-57. Published online August 18, 2014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.52
- 37,977 View
- 204 Download
- 11 Web of Science
- 10 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
It is important for journal editors to keep up to date with the changes happening in the international journal environment to ensure that their own publications remain current and meet international expectations. Dramatic changes have taken place in the journals environment during the last two decades, frequently driven by technology but also by increased global participation in scholarly and scientific research and concern about the commercial influence on dissemination of knowledge. Technical solutions have attempted to address the growth in research but have sometimes added to the tsunami of information and increased the need to manage quality. To this end experiments with the traditional quality control and dissemination systems have been attempted, but news of improvements are frequently overshadowed by alarms about ethical problems. There is particular concern about some of the new publishers who are not adhering to established quality control and ethical practices. Within a potentially fragmenting system, however, there are also emerging collaborative projects helping to knit together the different elements of the publishing landscape to improve quality, linkages and access.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Global trend of clinical biomarkers of health and disease during the period (1913–2021): systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Snezana M. Jovicic
African Journal of Urology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Predatory publishing through McCornarck’s information manipulation theory
Harry Kipkemoi Bett
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2020; 69(4/5): 331. CrossRef - Forecast of the Development of Russian Scientific Journals: The Publishers
O. V. Moskaleva, M. A. Akoev
Scholarly Research and Information.2020; 3(2-3): 131. CrossRef - Mapping the Current Research Agenda on Scholarly Publishing: Scopus-Indexed Reviews
Elena Tikhonova, Lilia Raitskaya
Journal of Language and Education.2020; 6(4): 4. CrossRef - English language policies in scientific journals: Signs of change in the field of economics
Ann C. Henshall
Journal of English for Academic Purposes.2018; 36: 26. CrossRef - How open access is crucial to the future of science: A reply
H. Charles Romesburg
The Journal of Wildlife Management.2017; 81(4): 567. CrossRef - Supply chain management 1982–2015: a review
Nasrin Asgari, Ehsan Nikbakhsh, Alex Hill, Reza Zanjirani Farahani
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics.2016; 27(3): 353. CrossRef - Topics of major current interest in scholarly editing and publishing based on the content analysis of selected journals
Yeonok Chung
Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 59. CrossRef - How Green Is This Paper?
Toby Miller
Culture Unbound.2015; 7(4): 588. CrossRef - What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
Sun Huh
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147. CrossRef
- Global trend of clinical biomarkers of health and disease during the period (1913–2021): systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Original Article
- Correlation among the citation indices of Korean scientific journals listed in international databases
- Jung A Kim, Sun Huh, Min Sun Chu
- Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):27-36. Published online February 13, 2014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.27
- 28,286 View
- 190 Download
- 10 Web of Science
- 9 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
We would like to verify the correlation among various citation indicators of 62 Korean scientific journals listed in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. From a total of 85 Korean journals listed in both WoS as of January 2013, and 132 journals listed in Scopus as of 2011, 62 Korean journals listed in both citation indices were selected for analysis. Citation index indicators selected for analysis include impact factor (IF), 5-year impact factor (5yrIF), Eigenfactor score (EF), article influence score (AIS) (list of WoS indicators), SCImago journal rank (SJR), h-index, and impact index (ImIndex) (list of Scopus indicators). It took an average of eight years for a newly founded journal to be listed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Since the IF, ImIndex, and AIS values failed to exceed 1.0, Korean journals’ popularity and prestige were confirmed to be minimal. Analyzed journals that were written in English exhibited higher SJR and h-index values than ones written in Korean. WoS’ IF exhibited a correlation with WoS’ 5yrIF, EF, AIS, and Scopus’ SJR, h-index, and ImIndex. Since the ‘popularity and prestige of Korean journals’ have been confirmed to be minimal, steps must be taken to improve this status. Popularity-based indicators have been shown to strongly correlate with prestige-based indicators in Korean science journals. Therefore, there must be a strategic approach taken to improve IF values.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by- Demystifying multilingual LIS journals in Scopus: Languages, coverage, metrics, and implications
Eungi Kim
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2026; 58(1): 125. CrossRef - Temporal characteristics of journals indexed in both KCI and Scopus: analyzing journal age, coverage and journal metrics
Eungi Kim, Madhu Atteraya, Shreejana Gnawali
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Mentorship program to elevate journal quality and rankings in Indonesia: a case study
Ferry Efendi, Hery Purnobasuki, Dessy Harisanty, Diyah Alinia Oktariningtias, Sarah Khairunnisa
Science Editing.2024; 11(2): 149. CrossRef - Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature
Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee
The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299. CrossRef - Healthcare Informatics Research's Journey of Paving the Road to Excellence in Global Healthcare Informatics
Mona Choi, Jung A Kim
Healthcare Informatics Research.2018; 24(2): 95. CrossRef - A Step Forward for KABC
Hyejung Chang, Kim Jung A
Business Communication Research and Practice.2018; 1(1): 1. CrossRef - Citation Analysis for Biomedical and Health Sciences Journals Published in Korea
Juyeon Oh, Hyejung Chang, Jung A Kim, Mona Choi, Ziyoung Park, Yoonhee Cho, Eun-gyu Lee
Healthcare Informatics Research.2017; 23(3): 218. CrossRef - Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
Kihong Kim
Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2. CrossRef - How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
Sun Huh
International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3. CrossRef
- Demystifying multilingual LIS journals in Scopus: Languages, coverage, metrics, and implications
First
Prev
