Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Most cited articles

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Most cited articles
194 Most cited articles
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Increase in frequency of citation by SCIE journals of non-Medline journals after listing in an open access full-text database
Geum-Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):24-26.   Published online February 13, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.24
  • 20,414 View
  • 198 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 35 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

We hypothesized that it is not open access status but rather exposure in the PubMed platform that affects citation frequency in medical journals. In November 2008, medical journals from Korea began to be added to PubMed Central (PMC). Therefore, it would be interesting to know whether or not their impact factor based on Web of Science has increased since the journals were listed in PMC/PubMed. To answer this question, a citation analysis of seven journals that have been indexed in PMC since 2008 or 2009 was done. Only non-Medline journals were selected and the impact factors of five Medline journals were compared. The impact factor was calculated via Web of Science. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) data were used if the data of the target journals were provided in JCR. Trends for the impact factors of different years were analyzed using dBSTAT ver. 5.0. There has been an increasing rates of the impact factor for the seven non-Medline journals, 1.92 in 2011 over 2010; 3.27 in 2010 over 2009; 1.12 in 2012 over 2011. As for the five Medline journals, the increasing rate in 2010 over 2009 was 1.18; however, those of 2011 over 2010 and 2012 over 2011 were 1.01 and 1.04 respectively. The Science Citation Index Expanded impact factor of medical journals published in Korea can be increased if those journals are published in English and listed in PMC. This is an effect of the platform in which the journals are listed and not just an effect of free access.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based recommendations for increasing the citation frequency of original articles
    Nicole Heßler, Andreas Ziegler
    Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3367.     CrossRef
  • Suggestions for Exercise Science’s Promotion to a Top-Tier Journal in the Category of Sports Science
    Sun Huh
    Exercise Science.2022; 31(3): 279.     CrossRef
  • Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2022; 28(3): 165.     CrossRef
  • PubMed Central as a platform for the survival of open-access biomedical society journals published in Korea
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353.     CrossRef
  • Development Status of the Korean Journal of Child Studies 4 Years After the Suggestions made in 2016
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2020; 41(6): 1.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals
    Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi
    Science Editing.2019; 6(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • The great rise ofIntestinal Researchas an international journal 3 years after its language change to English as evidenced by journal metrics
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Intestinal Research.2017; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to MEDLINE, indexing with Medical Subject Headings, and open data policy for the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 14.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool
    Geum‐Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Learned Publishing.2016; 29(3): 193.     CrossRef
  • Current status of Science Citation Index Expanded listing of Korean medical journals and effect of PubMed electronic publication ahead of print to their impact factors
    Jae Jun Shim, Byung-Ho Kim
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 94.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges
    Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza
    Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics-Based Position ofDiabetes & Metabolism Journalafter the Change of Its Text Language to English
    Sun Huh
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2014; 38(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Application of new information technologies to scholarly journals: ORCID, CrossMark, and FundRef
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(5): 455.     CrossRef
  • How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
    Sun Huh
    International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • The basics of CrossRef extensible markup language
    Rachael Lammey
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 76.     CrossRef
  • Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
Training Material
CrossRef text and data mining services
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):22-27.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.32
  • 20,702 View
  • 201 Download
  • 28 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. It is a registration agency for the digital object identifier (DOI), and has built additional services for CrossRef members around the DOI and the bibliographic metadata that publishers deposit in order to register DOIs for their publications. Among these services are CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate, which helps publishers screen for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts and FundRef, which gives publishers standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research. To add to these services, Cross-Ref launched CrossRef text and data mining services in May 2014. This article will explain the thinking behind CrossRef launching this new service, what it offers to publishers and researchers alike, how publishers can participate in it, and the uptake of the service so far.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hidden limitations of analyses via alternative bibliometric services
    Libor Ansorge
    Scientometrics.2023; 128(3): 2031.     CrossRef
  • Tera-hertz (THz) catalysis on MXene for enhanced selectivity from CO2 to CO
    Ziao Wang, Yao Xu, Tao Feng, Chaojun Lei, Yu Zhao, Xi Zhu
    Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers.2023; 10(10): 2903.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Enable a Data-Oriented Experimental Design Approach for Producing Biochar and Hydrochar from Biomass
    Amauri J. Paula, Odair Pastor Ferreira, Antonio G. Souza Filho, Francisco Nepomuceno Filho, Carlos E. Andrade, Andreia F. Faria
    Chemistry of Materials.2022; 34(3): 979.     CrossRef
  • CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating
    Boris Alperin, Inna Zibareva, Aleksey Vedyagin
    Science Management: Theory and Practice.2022; 4(1): 143.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers
    Sen Liu, Aaron P. Stebner, Branden B. Kappes, Xiaoli Zhang
    Additive Manufacturing.2021; 39: 101877.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape
    Avishek Chatterjee, Cosimo Nardi, Cary Oberije, Philippe Lambin
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(4): 300.     CrossRef
  • Data-Driven Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Gas-Fluidized Beds Using Data Extracted by Text Mining
    Jibin Zhou, Duiping Liu, Mao Ye, Zhongmin Liu
    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.2021; 60(37): 13727.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for ocean science data integration: current state, gaps, and way forward
    Tomer Sagi, Yoav Lehahn, Koby Bar, Jody W. Deming, Lisa A. Miller
    Elem Sci Anth.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Citation.js: a format-independent, modular bibliography tool for the browser and command line
    Lars G. Willighagen
    PeerJ Computer Science.2019; 5: e214.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials
    Edward Kim, Kevin Huang, Alex Tomala, Sara Matthews, Emma Strubell, Adam Saunders, Andrew McCallum, Elsa Olivetti
    Scientific Data.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
Original Article
A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research published in nursing journals
Juyeon Oh, Aekyung Kim
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):118-124.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.205
  • 7,085 View
  • 279 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in nursing journals. The analysis focused on the description of most productive journals, institutions, and countries, as well as the characteristics of the documents.
Methods
The publications analyzed in this study were retrieved from the Web of Science database with search keywords. The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on July 10, 2020. The inclusion criteria were relevant English-language publications in journals published in the Science Citation Index Expanded or Social Science Citation Index. Content analysis of original articles and reviews was done.
Results
An analysis of 125 publications on COVID-19 from 48 journals showed that the most productive journal and country were the Journal of Clinical Nursing (n = 18) and the USA (n = 53), respectively. Original articles (n = 27, 21.6%) and review papers (n = 4, 3.2%) accounted for 24.8% of the articles, and the highest number of papers were found in early access (published ahead of print) (n = 51, 40.8%) and Q1 journals (n = 73, 58.4%). The content analysis found 10 data-based original articles or reviews, which dealt with the topics of nurse training (n = 2), nurses’ psychosocial status (n = 2), nursing research methodology (n = 1), nursing guidelines (n = 4), and protection for nurses (n = 1).
Conclusion
This study presents the current situation of nursing research on COVID-19 based on an analysis of publications in nursing journals and provides meaningful information to nursing researchers and editorial board members. The number of data-based original articles on nursing related to COVID-19 remains low.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Description and Analysis of Research on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Published in Nursing Journals Indexed in SCOPUS
    Leticia Cuellar-Pompa, José Ángel Rodríguez-Gómez, María Mercedes Novo-Muñoz, Natalia Rodríguez-Novo, Yurena M. Rodríguez-Novo, Carlos-Enrique Martínez-Alberto
    Nursing Reports.2024; 14(2): 655.     CrossRef
  • An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization
    Arslan Sheikh, Nadeem Siddique, Saima Qutab, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood
    Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2023; 55(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Community-based tourism in East Asia: A bibliometric research note
    Aaron Tham, Shirley Wei Lee Chin
    Tourism and Hospitality Research.2023; 23(3): 459.     CrossRef
  • Factors associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 among adolescents in South Korea
    Sunhee Park, Sumi Oh
    Journal of Pediatric Nursing.2022; 62: e69.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic networks of COVID-19’s top papers
    Nosrat Riahinia, Farshid Danesh, Somayeh GhaviDel
    Library Hi Tech.2022; 40(2): 454.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic
    Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 879.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of COVID‐19 publications in nursing by visual mapping method
    Ayşe Çiçek Korkmaz, Serap Altuntaş
    Journal of Nursing Management.2022; 30(6): 1892.     CrossRef
  • Between panic and motivation: did the first wave of COVID-19 affect scientific publishing in Mediterranean countries?
    Mona Farouk Ali
    Scientometrics.2022; 127(6): 3083.     CrossRef
  • Eye-Related COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production Indexed in Scopus
    Verónica García-Pascual, Elvira García-Beltrán, Begoña Domenech-Amigot
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9927.     CrossRef
  • Coronavirus disease-19 in environmental fields: a bibliometric and visualization mapping analysis
    Shaher H. Zyoud, Ahed H. Zyoud
    Environment, Development and Sustainability.2021; 23(6): 8895.     CrossRef
  • A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020
    Leonardo B. Furstenau, Bruna Rabaioli, Michele Kremer Sott, Danielli Cossul, Mariluza Sott Bender, Eduardo Moreno Júdice De Mattos Farina, Fabiano Novaes Barcellos Filho, Priscilla Paola Severo, Michael S. Dohan, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(3): 952.     CrossRef
  • Nursing Challenges in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Era
    Jeung-Im Kim, Mi Yu
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2021; 51(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021
    Kyung Won Kim, Geume Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • The nature of rapid response to COVID-19 in Latin America: an examination of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico
    Janaina Pamplona da Costa, André Luiz Sica de Campos, Paulo Roberto Cintra, Liz Felix Greco, Johan Hendrik Poker
    Online Information Review.2021; 45(4): 729.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Nursing Research in the Web of Science
    Gregorio Jesús Alcalá-Albert, María Elena Parra-González
    Education Sciences.2021; 11(9): 455.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research – a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database
    Tosin Yinka Akintunde, Shaojun Chen, Taha Hussein Musa, Felix Oluseyi Amoo, Adekunle Adedeji, Elhakim Ibrahim, Angwi Enow Tassang, Idriss Hussein Musa, Hassan Hussein Musa
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2021; 17(11): 3887.     CrossRef
  • Visibility, collaboration and impact of the Cuban scientific output on COVID-19 in Scopus
    Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Frank Hernández-García, Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo, Christian R. Mejia
    Heliyon.2021; : e08258.     CrossRef
  • A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GREEN PRODUCTIVITY CONCEPT
    Erdinc KOC, Ahmed İhsan ŞİMŞEK
    İşletme Bilimi Dergisi.2021; 9(3): 393.     CrossRef
  • The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics
    Nana Liu, Zeshui Xu, Marinko Skare
    Oeconomia Copernicana.2021; 12(2): 217.     CrossRef
  • COVID-19 and publishing
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44.     CrossRef
Training Material
Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):99-104.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.99
  • 19,642 View
  • 138 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

In the era of information technology, scholarly journals cannot escape the rising tide of technological advancement. To be exposed more easily to readers, the web forms of scholarly journals and articles become more important year after year. Furthermore, there is a trend of print journals closing, and a significant emergence of online journals. Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) extensible markup language (XML) became an National Information Standards Organization standard language in online journal publishing in 2012. It is an essential format to present readers with a more user-friendly interface. JATS XML was developed by PubMed Central (PMC) XML, which was a deposit form of articles to PMC. Editors and other publishing-related personnel should be able to understand the concept and production process of XML files. When JATS XML is produced, a variety of web presentation views can be generated, such as PubReader and epub 3.0. Further, JATS XML can be easily converted to digital object identifier CrossRef XML, CrossMark XML, and FundRef XML. Small scholarly society journal editors and publishers can promote the visibility of their journals by depositing JATS XML files to PMC or ScienceCentral. Owing to these benefits of JATS XML, publishers and editors should now adopt JATS XML for journal publishing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cross-lingual citations in English papers: a large-scale analysis of prevalence, usage, and impact
    Tarek Saier, Michael Färber, Tornike Tsereteli
    International Journal on Digital Libraries.2022; 23(2): 179.     CrossRef
  • Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
    Younsang Cho
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 162.     CrossRef
  • The role of metadata in reproducible computational research
    Jeremy Leipzig, Daniel Nüst, Charles Tapley Hoyt, Karthik Ram, Jane Greenberg
    Patterns.2021; 2(9): 100322.     CrossRef
  • Semantic Publication of Agricultural Scientific Literature Using Property Graphs
    Francisco Abad-Navarro, José Antonio Bernabé-Diaz, Alexander García-Castro, Jesualdo Tomás Fernandez-Breis
    Applied Sciences.2020; 10(3): 861.     CrossRef
  • unarXive: a large scholarly data set with publications’ full-text, annotated in-text citations, and links to metadata
    Tarek Saier, Michael Färber
    Scientometrics.2020; 125(3): 3085.     CrossRef
  • The Thirty-First Year Journey, the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Hee Jeong Yoo, Min-Hyeon Park, Jae Hyun Yoo, Minha Hong, Geon Ho Bahn
    Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.2020; 31(4): 201.     CrossRef
  • Improving Publication Pipeline with Automated Biological Entity Detection and Validation Service
    Weijia Xu, Amit Gupta, Pankaj Jaiswal, Crispin Taylor, Patti Lockhart, Jennifer Regala
    Data and Information Management.2019; 3(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Finding useful data across multiple biomedical data repositories using DataMed
    Lucila Ohno-Machado, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, George Alter, Ian Fore, Jeffrey Grethe, Hua Xu, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Anupama E Gururaj, Elizabeth Bell, Ergin Soysal, Nansu Zong, Hyeon-eui Kim
    Nature Genetics.2017; 49(6): 816.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Natural Language Processing Using Kepler Workflow System: First Steps
    Ankit Goyal, Alok Singh, Shitij Bhargava, Daniel Crawl, Ilkay Altintas, Chun-Nan Hsu
    Procedia Computer Science.2016; 80: 712.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the suitability of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies journal evaluation tool
    Geum‐Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Learned Publishing.2016; 29(3): 193.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Text mining resources for the life sciences
    Piotr Przybyła, Matthew Shardlow, Sophie Aubin, Robert Bossy, Richard Eckart de Castilho, Stelios Piperidis, John McNaught, Sophia Ananiadou
    Database.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
Review
CrossRef developments and initiatives: an update on services for the scholarly publishing community from CrossRef
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):13-18.   Published online February 13, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.13
  • 17,928 View
  • 151 Download
  • 36 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef (http://www.crossref.org) is a not-for-profit membership association of publishers. Since its founding in 2000, CrossRef has provided reference linking services for over 62 million scholarly content items, including journal articles, books and book chapters, conference proceedings, reference entries, technical reports, standards, and data sets. CrossRef also provides additional collaborative services designed to improve trust in the scholarly communications process, including Cited-By linking, CrossCheck plagiarism screening, CrossMark update identification, and the FundRef funder identification service. All of these services continue to develop to try to meet the evolving needs of publishers, and this article attempts to give an overview of them and highlight important updates which have taken place over the last 12 months.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council
    Bianca Kramer, Hans de Jonge
    Quantitative Science Studies.2022; 3(3): 583.     CrossRef
  • How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv
    Jialiang Lin, Yao Yu, Yu Zhou, Zhiyang Zhou, Xiaodong Shi
    Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 555.     CrossRef
  • Acesso aberto a artigos, dados e materiais de pesquisa na RBMFC
    Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Thiago Dias Sarti
    Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade.2020; 15(42): 2671.     CrossRef
  • Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature
    Daniel S Himmelstein, Ariel Rodriguez Romero, Jacob G Levernier, Thomas Anthony Munro, Stephen Reid McLaughlin, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Casey S Greene
    eLife.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Using the Crossref Metadata API to explore publisher content
    Rachael Lammey
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges
    Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza
    Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government’s support for publishing
    Sun Huh, Hye-Min Cho, Hyungsun Kim
    Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • Application of new information technologies to scholarly journals: ORCID, CrossMark, and FundRef
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(5): 455.     CrossRef
  • Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
    Sun Huh
    International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics-Based Position ofDiabetes & Metabolism Journalafter the Change of Its Text Language to English
    Sun Huh
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2014; 38(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Bibliometric analysis and visualization of Islamic economics and finance articles indexed in Scopus by Indonesian authors
Luqman Hakim Handoko
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):169-176.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.213
  • 6,495 View
  • 378 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the bibliometric characteristics and trends of articles on Islamic economics and finance (IEF) indexed in Scopus by Indonesian authors.
Methods
Data were retrieved from the Scopus database. Articles were searched in June 2020 with the limitation of Indonesian authors or affiliation. The keywords used in this study included IEF, and variations thereof, with the search filtered by Indonesian affiliation. Simple statistical methods were used, and a bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software. This study visualized patterns of the co-occurrence of keywords, citations of documents, co-citation relationships, and bibliographic coupling.
Results
The number of studies in the field of IEF increased in recent years. Articles on IEF have been published in more than 150 journals, among which the most popular was Talent Development and Excellence. Collaboration among authors reached 33 countries, most prominently Malaysia. Certain keywords, such as halal tourism, zakat, and Islamic microfinance, have become the most popular in the last few years. The bibliometric analysis showed that 24 documents had the largest citation relationship, 52 journals had the largest co-citation network, and 172 documents had the largest bibliographic coupling relationship.
Conclusion
Research in the field of IEF by Indonesian authors has increased rapidly, with extensive collaboration. Halal tourism is among the most popular research topics in the last few years and is a prospective topic for future research. Moreover, the results showed that sources on IEF were widely used as references.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A bibliometric review of Islamic economics and finance bibliometric papers: an overview of the future of Islamic economics and finance
    Denizar Abdurrahman Mi'raj, Salih Ulev
    Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Halal supply chain: a bibliometric analysis
    Aam Slamet Rusydiana, Mohammad Iqbal Irfany, Aisyah As-Salafiyah, Marco Tieman
    Journal of Islamic Marketing.2023; 14(12): 3009.     CrossRef
  • Evolution in Islamic capital market: a bibliometric analysis
    Roslina Mohamad Shafi, Yan-Ling Tan
    Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023; 14(8): 1474.     CrossRef
  • Islamic Economy and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R
    Suddin Lada, Brahim Chekima, Rudy Ansar, Mohamad Isa Abdul Jalil, Lim Ming Fook, Caroline Geetha, Mohamed Bouteraa, Mohd Rahimie Abdul Karim
    Sustainability.2023; 15(6): 5174.     CrossRef
  • Islamic banking spin-offs decision: A bibliometric review
    Zulfikar Bagus Pambuko, Jaka Sriyana
    Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic analysis on real estate finance literature: A study on articles in Web of Science Core Collection Database
    Nurgün KOMŞUOĞLU YILMAZ
    Business Economics and Management Research Journal.2023; 6(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının bibliyometrik analizi: 2017-2021 dönemine bir bakış
    Abdullah Zübeyr AKMAN, Meral ERDİRENCELEBİ
    Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 16(3): 597.     CrossRef
  • The Future Growth for Islamic Microfinance in Indonesia: Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil Domains
    Haerudin Haerudin, Annisa Fajri, Syadiyah Abdul Shukor, Kartiko Adi Wibowo
    SSRN Electronic Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of halal tourism: future research agenda
    Lalu Supardin, Mohammad Suyanto, Anas Hidayat, Tony Wijaya
    Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prominent scholars in Islamic economics and allied disciplines: a bibliometric review
    Mohamed Aslam Akbar, Mohamed Asmy Mohd Thas Thaker, Mustafa Omar Mohammed, Nik Hziman Nik Mat, Hassanuddeen Abd.Aziz
    Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Islamic Economics Answers to a Wide Range of Contemporary Socio-Economic Challenges
    Reza Muhammad Rizqi, Hartini
    Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba.2022; : 143.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of cold spray coating process using VOSviewer
    Ayaz Mehmood, Mohammad Zunaid, Ashok Kumar Madan
    Materials Today: Proceedings.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Performance of Indonesian Scopus journals in the area of agricultural and biological sciences
    Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Ida Widianingsih, Sinta Ningrum, Suryanto Suryanto, Yan Rianto
    Science Editing.2022; 10(1): 100.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of the International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
    Mücahit Özdemir, Mervan Selçuk
    International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management.2021; 14(4): 767.     CrossRef
  • What do we know about zakat literature? A bibliometric review
    Muneer M. Alshater, Ram Al Jaffri Saad, Norazlina Abd. Wahab, Irum Saba
    Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.2021; 12(4): 544.     CrossRef
  • Better, Faster, Stronger: The Evolution of Co-authorship in International Management Research Between 1990 and 2016
    Oliver Wieczorek, Markus Eckl, Madeleine Bausch, Erik Radisch, Christoph Barmeyer, Malte Rehbein
    SAGE Open.2021; 11(4): 215824402110615.     CrossRef
  • Research Trends in The Field of Islamic Social Finance
    Jamila Abubakar, Ahmet Aysan
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019
Quan-Hoang Vuong, Viet-Phuong La, Manh-Tung Ho, Thu-Trang Vuong, Manh-Toan Ho
Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):34-44.   Published online February 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.187
  • 9,139 View
  • 274 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community. For instance, retractions help scientific enterprise perform its self-correcting function and provide lessons for future researchers; furthermore, they represent the fulfillment of social responsibilities, and they enable scientific communities to offer better monitoring services to keep problematic studies in check. This study aims to provide a thorough overview of the practice of retraction in scientific publishing from the first incident to the present.
Methods
We built a database using SQL Server 2016 and homemade artificial intelligence tools to extract and classify data sources including RetractionWatch, official publishers’ archives, and online communities into ready-to-analyze groups and to scan them for new data. After data cleaning, a dataset of 18,603 retractions from 1,753 (when the first retracted paper was published) to February 2019, covering 127 research fields, was established.
Results
Notable retraction events include the rise in retracted articles starting in 1999 and the unusual number of retractions in 2010. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Elsevier, and Springer account for nearly 60% of all retracted papers globally, with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers contributing the most retractions, even though it is not the organization that publishes the most journals. Finally, reasons for retraction are diverse but the most common is “fake peer review”.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the frequency of retraction has boomed in the past 20 years, and it underscores the importance of understanding and learning from the practice of retracting scientific articles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Yuki Furuse
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retractions in arts and humanities: an analysis of the retraction notices
    Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni
    Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels
    Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu
    Journal of Data and Information Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19
    Somipam R. Shimray
    Accountability in Research.2023; 30(7): 393.     CrossRef
  • “Research exceptionalism” in the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of scientific retractions in Scopus
    Priscila Rubbo, Caroline Lievore, Celso Biynkievycz Dos Santos, Claudia Tania Picinin, Luiz Alberto Pilatti, Bruno Pedroso
    Ethics & Behavior.2023; 33(5): 339.     CrossRef
  • Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers
    Angelo Capodici, Aurelia Salussolia, Francesco Sanmarchi, Davide Gori, Davide Golinelli
    Quality & Quantity.2023; 57(5): 4881.     CrossRef
  • Are female scientists underrepresented in self-retractions for honest error?
    Mariana D. Ribeiro, Jesus Mena-Chalco, Karina de Albuquerque Rocha, Marlise Pedrotti, Patrick Menezes, Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos
    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices
    Soo Young Hwang, Dong Keon Yon, Seung Won Lee, Min Seo Kim, Jong Yeob Kim, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Marco Solmi, Andre F Carvalho, Eunyoung Kim, Jae Il Shin, John P A Ioannidis
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses
    Caitlin J. Bakker, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Sarah Jane Brown, Maurice P. Zeegers
    Systematic Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retractions covered by retraction watch from 2017 to 2022: a perspective from Indian researchers
    Somipam R. Shimray, Sakshi Tiwari, Chennupati Kodand Ramaiah
    Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction
    Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu
    Learned Publishing.2022; 35(2): 261.     CrossRef
  • Correction of the Scientific Production: Publisher Performance Evaluation Using a Dataset of 4844 PubMed Retractions
    Catalin Toma, Liliana Padureanu, Bogdan Toma
    Publications.2022; 10(2): 18.     CrossRef
  • Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers
    Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann
    Scientometrics.2021; 126(6): 5181.     CrossRef
  • Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities
    Caroline Lievore, Priscila Rubbo, Celso Biynkievycz dos Santos, Claudia Tânia Picinin, Luiz Alberto Pilatti
    Scientometrics.2021; 126(8): 6871.     CrossRef
  • Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills
    Horacio Rivera, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction
    Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu
    Accountability in Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Analysis of Retracted Publications in Dentistry: A 23-Year Review
    Shannon Samuel, Joe Mathew Cherian, Abi M. Thomas, Stefano Corbella
    International Journal of Dentistry.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
Review
Overview of journal metrics
Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):16-20.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.112
  • 15,069 View
  • 428 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. The impact factor and related metrics including the immediacy index and the aggregate impact factor, which are provided by the Journal Citation Reports, are explained in detail. The Eigenfactor score and the article influence score are also reviewed. In addition, journal metrics such as CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and g-index are discussed. Limitations and problems that these metrics have are pointed out. We should be cautious to rely on those quantitative measures too much when we evaluate journals or researchers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
    Mina Moradzadeh, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi
    Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 279.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
    Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, Valerie Chow, Sharleen G. Maduranayagam, Lucas J. Santoro, Lindsey Sikora, Ana Marusic, Daniel Shanahan, Randy Townsend, Alan Ehrlich, Alfonso Iorio, David Moher, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0282168.     CrossRef
  • A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance
    Xinxin Xu, Ziqiang Zeng, Yurui Chang
    Learned Publishing.2023; 36(4): 619.     CrossRef
  • Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance
    O. V. Kirillova, E. V. Tikhonova
    Science Editor and Publisher.2022; 7(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence algorithms used for microbial fuel cell research
    Luis Erick Coy-Aceves, Benito Corona-Vasquez
    Water Practice and Technology.2022; 17(10): 2071.     CrossRef
  • Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance
    William L. Croft, Jörg-Rüdiger Sack
    Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(4): 101349.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • Kind Attention to the Altitude of Altmetrics
    Shekar Shobana
    Brazilian Dental Journal.2020; 31(5): 457.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Scientificity and H-Index.”
    Ali Yavuz KARAHAN
    Acta Medica Alanya.2020; 4(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
    Ernesto Roldan-Valadez, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras, Camilo Rios
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2019; 188(3): 939.     CrossRef
  • CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
    Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew Plume
    Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 367.     CrossRef
  • High Impact and Highly Cited Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications by Canadian Occupational Therapy Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Ted Brown, Yuh-Shan Ho, Sharon A. Gutman
    Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2019; 33(4): 329.     CrossRef
  • Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
    Judit Dobránszki, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
    Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 387.     CrossRef
  • A New Metric for the Analysis of the Scientific Article Citation Network
    Livia Lin-Hsuan Chang, Frederick Kin Hing Phoa, Junji Nakano
    IEEE Access.2019; 7: 132027.     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic measures of top-tier finance and information systems journals
    Thomas Krueger, Jack Shorter
    Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2019; 12(5): 841.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
    Sun Huh
    Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219.     CrossRef
Training Material
How to apply CrossMark and FundRef via CrossRef extensible markup language
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):84-90.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.84
  • 20,253 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. In the 14 years since CrossRef launched, it has developed a number of services that hinge around the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and the publication metadata submitted to CrossRef by publishers registering DOIs. CrossMark and FundRef are two additional services from CrossRef that publishers can choose to participate in, and both require publishers to provide additional information with the bibliographic metadata provided within their CrossRef deposits. This article will aim to show what this additional metadata is, how it should be formatted and why, so that publishers can use it to enhance their content and participate in additional CrossRef services that benefit the scholarly communications industry.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
    Chris Fradkin, Rogério Mugnaini
    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3.     CrossRef
  • How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
    Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements
    Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Istvan S. Szilagyi, Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
    Science and Engineering Ethics.2016; 22(4): 1063.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh, Soo Young Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Xu-jie Zhou
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0163588.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • Journal’s step to leap to the international level and communication skill
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2014; 26(3): 159.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
Original Article
Bibliometric analysis of journals, authors, and topics related to COVID-19 and Islamic finance listed in the Dimensions database by Biblioshiny
Aam Slamet Rusydiana
Sci Ed. 2021;8(1):72-78.   Published online February 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.232
  • 8,578 View
  • 561 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: This bibliometric study investigated the current state of documents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Islamic finance published by digital object identifierequipped journals listed in the Dimensions database. The analysis focused on describing the characterictics and trends of the keywords, authors, and journals.
Methods
The data analyzed were from 149 research publications in Dimensions. The search tems were “COVID” and “Islamic finance.” The searches used to establish the study dataset were last updated on August 27, 2020. Descriptive statistical methods were used, and a bibliometric analysis was conducted using Biblioshiny, an R-based app, to generate a bibliometric map.
Results
The number of articles discussing the theme of COVID-19 and Islamic finance was quite large in recent months, with more than 100 articles published. The most popular keywords used were “COVID,” “food,” and “pandemic,” although there were also many keywords that related more specifically to the field of Islamic finance, namely “banks,” “markets,” “health,” “debt,” “equity,” “management,” and “stock.”
Conclusion
This study provides an overview of trends in the most popular keywords, journals, and authors of articles on the topic of COVID-19 and Islamic finance, which has been quite a popular theme in recent months, thereby providing information for researchers specializing in the field of Islamic finance. This theme has the potential to continue to be developed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of COVID-19 on the global forestry sector – A bibliometric analysis-based literature review
    Manuja Jayasundara, Parag Kadam, Puneet Dwivedi
    Forest Policy and Economics.2024; 158: 103103.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric review of Islamic economics and finance bibliometric papers: an overview of the future of Islamic economics and finance
    Denizar Abdurrahman Mi'raj, Salih Ulev
    Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of digital advancements on accounting, auditing and reporting literature: insights, practice implications and future research directions
    Mustafa Raza Rabbani
    Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Global Health Diplomacy and Governance: Mapping and Future Trends
    Ankit Singh, Priya Ravi
    Hospital Topics.2023; 101(3): 245.     CrossRef
  • Sustainable strategic management: A bibliometric analysis
    P. Kritee Rao, Akanksha Shukla
    Business Strategy and the Environment.2023; 32(6): 3902.     CrossRef
  • Unravelling the techno-functional building blocks of metaverse ecosystems – A review and research agenda
    Arpan Kumar Kar, P.S. Varsha
    International Journal of Information Management Data Insights.2023; 3(2): 100176.     CrossRef
  • Islamic banking spin-offs decision: A bibliometric review
    Zulfikar Bagus Pambuko, Jaka Sriyana
    Cogent Business & Management.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Internet of Things in Digital Health Care Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature
    Mohammad Amees
    Journal of Hospital Librarianship.2023; 23(3): 164.     CrossRef
  • Uncovering Trends and Research Gaps in Corporate Governance and Islamic Finance
    Daing Maruak Sadek, Suhaida Abu Bakar, Muhammad Saiful Islami Mohd Taher, Mohd Badrul Hakimi Daud
    Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal.2023; 8(SI14): 149.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • Research trends and hotspots of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis
    Peng-fei Lyu, Jing-tai Li, Tang Deng, Guang-Xun Lin, Ping-ming Fan, Xu-Chen Cao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis
    Peng-fei Lyu, Yu Wang, Qing-Xiang Meng, Ping-ming Fan, Ke Ma, Sha Xiao, Xun-chen Cao, Guang-Xun Lin, Si-yuan Dong
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Data-Driven Approach to Assess Street Safety: Large-Scale Analysis of the Microscopic Design
    Wanshu Wu, Jinhan Guo, Ziying Ma, Kai Zhao
    ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.2022; 11(11): 537.     CrossRef
  • Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review
    Carlo Dindorf, Eva Bartaguiz, Freya Gassmann, Michael Fröhlich
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 20(1): 173.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • COVID-19 Konulu Medya ve İletişim Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Profili
    Hikmet TOSYALI
    Selçuk İletişim.2021; 14(4): 1578.     CrossRef
Review
Ethical challenges regarding artificial intelligence in medicine from the perspective of scientific editing and peer review
Seong Ho Park, Young-Hak Kim, Jun Young Lee, Soyoung Yoo, Chong Jai Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):91-98.   Published online June 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.164
  • 14,594 View
  • 396 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
This review article aims to highlight several areas in research studies on artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine that currently require additional transparency and explain why additional transparency is needed. Transparency regarding training data, test data and results, interpretation of study results, and the sharing of algorithms and data are major areas for guaranteeing ethical standards in AI research. For transparency in training data, clarifying the biases and errors in training data and the AI algorithms based on these training data prior to their implementation is critical. Furthermore, biases about institutions and socioeconomic groups should be considered. For transparency in test data and test results, authors should state if the test data were collected externally or internally and prospectively or retrospectively at first. It is necessary to distinguish whether datasets were convenience samples consisting of some positive and some negative cases or clinical cohorts. When datasets from multiple institutions were used, authors should report results from each individual institution. Full publication of the results of AI research is also important. For transparency in interpreting study results, authors should interpret the results explicitly and avoid over-interpretation. For transparency by sharing algorithms and data, sharing is required for replication and reproducibility of the research by other researchers. All of the above mentioned high standards regarding transparency of AI research in healthcare should be considered to facilitate the ethical conduct of AI research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Towards Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Medical Devices as a Real-Time Recommender System for Personalised Healthcare: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects
    Talha Iqbal, Mehedi Masud, Bilal Amin, Conor Feely, Mary Faherty, Tim Jones, Michelle Tierney, Atif Shahzad, Patricia Vazquez
    Health Sciences Review.2024; : 100150.     CrossRef
  • The Knowledge of Students at Bursa Faculty of Medicine towards Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study
    Deniz GÜVEN, Elif Güler KAZANCI, Ayşe ÖREN, Livanur SEVER, Pelin ÜNLÜ
    Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine.2024; 2(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence technology in MR neuroimaging. А radiologist’s perspective
    G. E. Trufanov, A. Yu. Efimtsev
    Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine.2023; 3(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • The minefield of indeterminate thyroid nodules: could artificial intelligence be a suitable diagnostic tool?
    Vincenzo Fiorentino, Cristina Pizzimenti, Mariausilia Franchina, Marina Gloria Micali, Fernanda Russotto, Ludovica Pepe, Gaetano Basilio Militi, Pietro Tralongo, Francesco Pierconti, Antonio Ieni, Maurizio Martini, Giovanni Tuccari, Esther Diana Rossi, Gu
    Diagnostic Histopathology.2023; 29(8): 396.     CrossRef
  • Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review
    Anto Čartolovni, Ana Tomičić, Elvira Lazić Mosler
    International Journal of Medical Informatics.2022; 161: 104738.     CrossRef
  • Transparency of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Insights from Professionals in Computing and Healthcare Worldwide
    Jose Bernal, Claudia Mazo
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(20): 10228.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence in the water domain: Opportunities for responsible use
    Neelke Doorn
    Science of The Total Environment.2021; 755: 142561.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for ultrasonography: unique opportunities and challenges
    Seong Ho Park
    Ultrasonography.2021; 40(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Key Principles of Clinical Validation, Device Approval, and Insurance Coverage Decisions of Artificial Intelligence
    Seong Ho Park, Jaesoon Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2021; 22(3): 442.     CrossRef
  • Is it alright to use artificial intelligence in digital health? A systematic literature review on ethical considerations
    Nicholas RJ Möllmann, Milad Mirbabaie, Stefan Stieglitz
    Health Informatics Journal.2021; 27(4): 146045822110523.     CrossRef
  • Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels
    Mark P. Sendak, Michael Gao, Nathan Brajer, Suresh Balu
    npj Digital Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine
    Zeeshan Ahmed, Khalid Mohamed, Saman Zeeshan, XinQi Dong
    Database.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The ethics of machine learning in medical sciences: Where do we stand today?
    Treena Basu, Sebastian Engel-Wolf, Olaf Menzer
    Indian Journal of Dermatology.2020; 65(5): 358.     CrossRef
  • Key principles of clinical validation, device approval, and insurance coverage decisions of artificial intelligence
    Seong Ho Park, Jaesoon Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2020; 63(11): 696.     CrossRef
  • Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44.     CrossRef
  • What should medical students know about artificial intelligence in medicine?
    Seong Ho Park, Kyung-Hyun Do, Sungwon Kim, Joo Hyun Park, Young-Suk Lim
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 18.     CrossRef
Original Article
Current and planned adoption of data sharing policies by editors of Korean scholarly journals
Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):19-24.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.151
  • 6,694 View
  • 171 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: This study analyzed the present status of data sharing polices and attitudes towards such policies through a web-based survey of editors of scholarly journals published in Korea.
Methods
From December 26, 2018 to January 3, 2019, a survey was distributed to 1,055 persons listed in the member directories of both the Korean Council of Science Editors and the Korean Federation of Science & Technology Societies. The survey contained four items on subjects’ information, three items that gathered information about the journals, and two further items on reasons for adopting or not adopting a data sharing policy and further opinions about such policies.
Results
Of the 100 respondents (from 100 journals), 13 stated that their journals had already adopted a data sharing policy. The strength of the policy was recommendation-only in 10 of those 13 journals. The most frequent reason for adopting a data sharing policy was to follow international trends. The repository sites were the Harvard Dataverse for two journals and Mendeley Data for one. The most common reasons for not adopting a data sharing policy were a lack of knowledge on data sharing, the possibility that submitters would not want to share their data, and the questionable effect of data sharing on scientific development.
Conclusion
Data sharing policies were uncommon among Korean scholarly journals. The advantages and disadvantages of adopting such policies should be discussed more actively among editors and researchers. Furthermore, data sharing infrastructure and training courses are required for data sharing policies to be established in scholarly journals in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
    Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
    Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics
    Yu Wang, Beibei Chen, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng
    Learned Publishing.2022; 35(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Ten Tips for Performing Your First Peer Review: The Next Step for the Aspiring Academic Plastic Surgeon
    Martin Frendø, Andreas Frithioff, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(04): 538.     CrossRef
  • Status and factors associated with the adoption of data sharing policies in Asian journals
    Jihyun Kim, Seo Young Bai
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals
    Brian Jackson
    Publications.2021; 9(2): 25.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with the Concept of Authorship and the Approval of an Institutional Review Board When Writing and Editing Journal Articles
    Sun Huh
    Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance.2020; 42(2): 63.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science
    Geum Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 136.     CrossRef
  • How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Data sharing policies of journals in life, health, and physical sciences indexed in Journal Citation Reports
    Jihyun Kim, Soon Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Jae Hwa Chang, Soo Young Kim
    PeerJ.2020; 8: e9924.     CrossRef
  • Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
    Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112.     CrossRef
  • Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493.     CrossRef
  • Strategie postępowania z danymi badawczymi w polskich i zagranicznych czasopismach reprezentujących nauki historyczne
    Adam Jachimczyk
    Studia Medioznawcze.2019; 21(1): 475.     CrossRef
Training Material
Applying Open Researchers and Contributors ID in scholarly journals
Jeonghee Im
Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):28-31.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.33
  • 14,142 View
  • 124 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Open Researchers and Contributors ID (ORCID) launched its registry services in October 2012. Consequently, adding personal information to the ORCID registry became routine work for researchers. To add ORCID to an online article, the tag < contrib-id contrib-id-type = “orcid” > needs to be included in the Journal Article Tag Suite extensible markup language file, if such a file has been produced by the publisher. Subsequently, all co-authors’ ORCID can be easily and conveniently collected and then integrated into the manuscript management system. In the current age of information and the Internet, journals need to keep pace with the surge of new standards and technologies. Editors should be able to accept and apply these new systems rapidly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Has Been Indexed in MEDLINE: A Major Achievement
    Won-Young Lee
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2019; 34(2): 138.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Is Indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index
    Won-Young Lee
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2017; 32(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • How to PrepareEndocrinology and Metabolismfor Reapplication to MEDLINE
    Sun Huh
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2017; 32(1): 58.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
Original Article
Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge
Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):149-155.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.210
  • 8,085 View
  • 260 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: There are growing questions about the market share of the largest publishers. Although evaluations based on Journal Citation Reports (JCR) are important, librarians are more interested in journal costs. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of estimating the market share of the largest publishers listed in JCR using the journal subscription price (journal price) and article processing charge (APC). Methods: The top 10 publishers were selected based on six indicators in JCR 2014 to 2018, and then their journal prices and APCs were investigated according to list prices. Other prior studies were also compared to estimate their market share more realistically because list and actual prices are not identical. Results: The estimated average price of subscription journals in JCR was 2,300 US dollars and the average APC for an article was 2,652 US dollars. The APC per article was more expensive than the average journal price. Based on journal price and APC, the market influence of the top three publishers was 48.0%, but their market share was estimated to be 55.2% when annual reports and other studies were combined with this study. The difference was due to Elsevier’s journal costs, as Elsevier’s market share was higher than its market influence. Conclusion: APCs require additional budgetary resources from institutions, but are another revenue source for publishers. Librarians need to reflect APC spending in journal subscription negotiations with the largest publishers. To clarify the market share more accurately, it is necessary to share information on subscription and APC costs paid by institutions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Choice of Open Access in Elsevier Hybrid Journals
    Sumiko Asai
    Publishing Research Quarterly.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals
    Sumiko Asai
    Information Discovery and Delivery.2023; 51(2): 121.     CrossRef
  • Publishing trends of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive study
    Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
    Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • Books under threat: Open access publishing and the neo‐liberal academy
    Matthew Gandy
    Area.2023; 55(4): 565.     CrossRef
  • Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review
    Ángel Borrego
    Learned Publishing.2023; 36(3): 359.     CrossRef
  • Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine: Annual Update on Bibliometric Indicators Including Scopus Quartile (Q3)
    Alexader A. Mzhelsky
    Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 22(4): 8.     CrossRef
  • Changes in article share and growth by publisher and access type in Journal Citation Reports 2016, 2018, and 2020
    Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research
    Lin Zhang, Yahui Wei, Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen
    Scientometrics.2022; 127(12): 7653.     CrossRef
  • Factors, components and dynamics: investigation of journal self-citation and citation by equal opportunity model
    Yangping Zhou
    Heliyon.2022; : e10292.     CrossRef
  • Creating shared value: A bibliometric review of organizational learning and corporate entrepreneurship
    Hardjanto Nusantoro, Erna Maulina, Anang Muftiadi, Margo Purnomo
    Corporate Law and Governance Review.2022; 4(1): 54.     CrossRef
  • Factors, Components and Dynamics: Investigation of Journal Self-Citation and Citation by Equal Opportunity Model
    Yangping Zhou
    SSRN Electronic Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports
    Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports
    Sang-Jun Kim, Kay Sook Park
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Collaboration between research institutes and large and small publishers for publishing open access journals
    Sumiko Asai
    Scientometrics.2021; 126(6): 5245.     CrossRef
  • Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context
    Yangping Zhou
    Scientometrics.2021; 126(7): 6013.     CrossRef
Essay
Solutions for identification problems: a look at the Research Organization Registry
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):65-69.   Published online February 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.192
  • 6,120 View
  • 124 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions
    Lin Zhang, Zhe Cao, Yuanyuan Shang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang
    Scientometrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions
    Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher, Tamara Heck, Kerstin Schoch
    Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 228.     CrossRef
  • The current landscape of author guidelines in chemistry through the lens of research data sharing
    Nicole A. Parks, Tillmann G. Fischer, Claudia Blankenburg, Vincent F. Scalfani, Leah R. McEwen, Sonja Herres-Pawlis, Steffen Neumann
    Pure and Applied Chemistry.2023; 95(4): 439.     CrossRef
  • Measuring the Concept of PID Literacy: User Perceptions and Understanding of PIDs in Support of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
    George Macgregor, Barbara S. Lancho-Barrantes, Diane Rasmussen Pennington
    Open Information Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The bibliometric journey towards technological and social change: A review of current challenges and issues
    Daniel Torres-Salinas, Nicolás Robinson-García, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
    El Profesional de la información.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metadata in journal publishing
    Joppe Bos, Kevin McCurley
    TUGboat.2023; 44(1): 71.     CrossRef
  • Open reproducible scientometric research with Alexandria3k
    Diomidis Spinellis, Alberto Baccini
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294946.     CrossRef
  • A half-century of global collaboration in science and the “Shrinking World”
    Keisuke Okamura
    Quantitative Science Studies.2023; 4(4): 938.     CrossRef
  • Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate
    Stian Soiland-Reyes, Peter Sefton, Mercè Crosas, Leyla Jael Castro, Frederik Coppens, José M. Fernández, Daniel Garijo, Björn Grüning, Marco La Rosa, Simone Leo, Eoghan Ó Carragáin, Marc Portier, Ana Trisovic, RO-Crate Community, Paul Groth, Carole Goble
    Data Science.2022; 5(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four bibliographic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic
    Philip J. Purnell
    Quantitative Science Studies.2022; 3(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • Persistent Identification for Conferences
    Julian Franken, Aliaksandr Birukou, Kai Eckert, Wolfgang Fahl, Christian Hauschke, Christoph Lange
    Data Science Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Affiliation Information in DataCite Dataset Metadata: a Flemish Case Study
    Niek Van Wettere
    Data Science Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov
    Laura Miron, Rafael S. Gonçalves, Mark A. Musen
    Scientific Data.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing