Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/kcse/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-05.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 89
Third World Studies Center, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, The Philippines
Copyright © 2019 Korean Council of Science Editors
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Response/response result |
UP publishers |
Non-UP publishers |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case no. | Years before resuming academic career after response | Case publicity levela) | Case letter (decade) | Years before resuming academic career after response | Case publicity level | |
Termination/ involuntary separation from service | 1 | ≤ 1 year | Low | C (1990s) | Not resumed | None |
4 | ≤ 1 year | None | ||||
13 | ≤ 1 year | None | D (2000s) | Not resumed | Medium | |
E (2000s) | ≤ 9 years | Medium | ||||
G (2000s) | Not resumed | Medium | ||||
Degree withdrawn | 2 | Not resumed | Medium | |||
8 | ≤ 2 years | Medium | ||||
Curtailed duties and privileges | 3 | N/A | None | |||
Publicized finding of “academic sloppiness” | H (2010s) | Not resumed | High | |||
Manuscript rejected | 6 | N/A | None | |||
9 | N/A | None | ||||
10 | N/A | None | ||||
11 | N/A | None | ||||
14 | N/A | None | ||||
16 | N/A | None | ||||
17 | N/A | None | ||||
18 | N/A | None | ||||
20 | N/A | None | ||||
21 | N/A | None | ||||
22 | N/A | None | ||||
23 | N/A | None | ||||
24 | N/A | None | ||||
25 | N/A | None | ||||
Pre-publication correction | 15 | N/A | None | |||
Commitment to correct post-publication | 19 | N/A | None | A (1930s) | NA | None |
Complaint filed, case unresolved | F (2000s) | NA | None | |||
Identified, no complaint/action | B (1990s) | NA | None | |||
I (2010s) | NA | None |
UP, University of the Philippines; NA, not applicable.
a) Gradations: 1) None (absolutely confidential cases; only parties involved and concerned university officials were privy to the case details); 2) Low (details of the case can be found at most in one print publication with limited distribution); 3) Medium (details of the case could be viewed, at most, in 2 print and/or 1 online publication soon after the case’s resolution); 4) High (details of the case easily obtainable, offline and online, appearing in various publications and having had mass media coverage while it was still pending or immediately after it was resolved).
Period | Rules (year implemented) | Summary of provisions | |
---|---|---|---|
Students | 1976-2014 | Sections 2a, 2m, 25a, and 25m of the Rules and Regulations on Student Conduct and Discipline | Dishonesty in relation to studies (plagiarism, cheating in examinations) is penalized with suspension for at least one year, while any other form of misconduct (including plagiarism in a non-academic context) may be penalized with, at most, expulsion, depending on how grave the offense was and the attendant circumstances |
2014-present | Section 1.a, Article IV of the Code of Student Conduct of UP Diliman | Plagiarism merits a “corrective measure” of, at the minimum, one semester (up to expulsion) for a first offender, and expulsion for recidivists | |
Faculty | 1963-present (other UP constituent universities) | Section 18 of the Rules and Regulations on the Discipline of Faculty Members and Employees | An employee may be removed, suspended, or reprimanded due to dishonesty (which has often been contemplated to include plagiarism) |
1963-2001 (UP Diliman) | |||
2001-present (UP Diliman) | Decision during the 75th Meeting of the UP Diliman University Council in July 2001 | Academic dishonesty cases (including cases of plagiarism) are brought under the jurisdiction of an Ethics Committee, whose function is not to immediately recommend administrative sanctions but to serve as “peer reviewers” of cases such as those involving intellectual dishonestya) |
UP, University of the Philippines.
a) Not successfully implemented given, as per confidential key informants, the lack of faculty who wanted to serve as members of the Ethics Committee. The jury system (no standing committee, case-to-case committee members drawn from all full professors) was implemented by the UP Board of Regents on 27 October 2011.