Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Metadata"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Training Material
The research nexus and Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI): sharing our goal of an open, connected ecosystem of research objects
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2023;10(2):190-194.   Published online July 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.315
  • 1,449 View
  • 204 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
As a community, it is impossible to ignore the fact that sharing research and information related to research is a much broader proposition than sharing an article, book, or conference paper. In supporting an evolving scholarly record, making connections between research organizations, contributors, actions, and objects helps give a more complete picture of the scholarly record, which open infrastructure organizations like Crossref call the research nexus. Crossref is working to support this evolution and is thinking about the metadata it collects via its members and that it supplements and curates, to make it broader than the rigid structures traditionally provided by content types. Furthermore, because of Crossref’s commitment to the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI), this network of information will be global and openly available for anyone in the community to access and reuse. The present article describes this vision in more detail, including why it is increasingly important to support the links between research and elements that contribute or are related to that research; how Crossref, its members, and the wider community can support it; and the work and planning Crossref is doing to make it easier to achieve this.
Original Article
How open access diamond journals comply with industry standards exemplified by Plan S technical requirements
Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):35-44.   Published online February 16, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.295
  • 4,356 View
  • 262 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose: This study investigated how well current open access (OA) diamond journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and a survey conform to Plan S requirements, including licenses, peer review, author copyright, unique article identifiers, digital archiving, and machine-readable licenses.
Methods
Data obtained from DOAJ journals and surveyed journals from mid-June to mid-July 2020 were analyzed for a variety of Plan S requirements. The results were presented using descriptive statistics.
Results
Out of 1,465 journals that answered, 1,137 (77.0%) reported compliance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles. The peer review types used by OA diamond journals were double-blind (6,339), blind (2,070), peer review (not otherwise specified, 1,879), open peer review (42), and editorial review (118) out of 10,449 DOAJ journals. An author copyright retention policy was adopted by 5,090 out of 10,448 OA diamond journals (48.7%) in DOAJ. Of the unique article identifiers, 5,702 (54.6%) were digital object identifiers, 58 (0.6%) were handles, and 14 (0.1%) were uniform resource names, while 4,675 (44.7%) used none. Out of 1,619 surveyed journals, the archiving solutions were national libraries (n=170, 10.5%), Portico (n=67, 4.1%), PubMed Central (n=15, 0.9%), PKP PN (n=91, 5.6%), LOCKSS (n=136, 8.4%), CLOCKSS (n=87, 5.4%), the National Computing Center for Higher Education (n=6, 0.3%), others (n=69, 4.3%), no policy (n=855, 52.8%), and no reply (n=123, 7.6%). Article-level metadata deposition was done by 8,145 out of 10,449 OA diamond journals (78.0%) in DOAJ.
Conclusion
OA diamond journals’ compliance with industry standards exemplified by the Plan S technical requirements was insufficient, except for the peer review type.
Training Material
Participation Reports help Crossref members drive research further
Anna Tolwinska
Sci Ed. 2021;8(2):180-185.   Published online August 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.253
  • 3,837 View
  • 107 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
This article aims to explain the key metadata elements listed in Participation Reports, why it’s important to check them regularly, and how Crossref members can improve their scores. Crossref members register a lot of metadata in Crossref. That metadata is machine-readable, standardized, and then shared across discovery services and author tools. This is important because richer metadata makes content more discoverable and useful to the scholarly community. It’s not always easy to know what metadata Crossref members register in Crossref. This is why Crossref created an easy-to-use tool called Participation Reports to show editors, and researchers the key metadata elements Crossref members register to make their content more useful. The key metadata elements include references and whether they are set to open, ORCID iDs, funding information, Crossmark metadata, licenses, full-text URLs for text-mining, and Similarity Check indexing, as well as abstracts. ROR IDs (Research Organization Registry Identifiers), that identify institutions will be added in the future. This data was always available through the Crossref ’s REST API (Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface) but is now visualized in Participation Reports. To improve scores, editors should encourage authors to submit ORCIDs in their manuscripts and publishers should register as much metadata as possible to help drive research further.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
Original Article
Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):125-129.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.206
  • 4,581 View
  • 86 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose: The 20th anniversary of Crossref is a good point to evaluate where Crossref stands with the communities it supports so that it can be in a position to serve their needs in the future.
Methods
This evaluation took the form of a survey and a series of interviews run by Shift Learning in mid-2019.
Results
Results are presented in the form of a report authored by Shift Learning which is discussed in this paper.
Conclusion
Overall, Crossref is appreciated and provides value for the scholarly community. However, it needs to make sure that it continues to serve key stakeholders, ensure that core systems work smoothly for all members and that they balance the needs of its different sizes of members and those who subscribe to or use the Crossref metadata. The report from Shift Learning makes specific recommendations regarding pricing, products and services and, communications which Crossref should consider to continue to address the needs of its diverse stakeholders

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

    Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S20.     CrossRef
  • Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

    Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S1.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
Training Materials
Using the Crossref Metadata API to explore publisher content
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2016;3(2):109-111.   Published online August 20, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.75
  • 13,678 View
  • 204 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Crossref is a not-for-profit membership association for scholarly publishers, founded in 2000. It is the largest digital object identifier (DOI) registration agency and provides publisher members with the capacity to deposit DOIs and their associated metadata to support persistent linking between different types of academic content. In a previous paper in Science Editing [1], Crossref mentioned a newly-created interface (http://search.crossref.org) that allowed publishers, libraries and researchers to search across nearly 50 million Crossref metadata records for items such as journal articles, books and conference proceedings. Since that paper was published, the search service has graduated into a live production service covering over 81 million DOIs, and Crossref has documented and made available the application programming interface used to build and support the search interface. This paper will provide information on this Crossref Metadata API, which is being widely adopted and used by many different stakeholders in the scholarly community, and give examples of how it is being employed by these parties.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Omer Benjakob, Rona Aviram, Jonathan Aryeh Sobel
    GigaScience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Low-Cost Assistive Technologies for Disabled People Using Open-Source Hardware and Software: A Systematic Literature Review
    Jonathan Alvarez Ariza, Joshua M. Pearce
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 124894.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the role of single‐board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature review
    Jonathan Á. Ariza, Heyson Baez
    Computer Applications in Engineering Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
    Halil Kilicoglu
    Briefings in Bioinformatics.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
CrossRef tools for small publishers
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):79-85.   Published online August 14, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.48
  • 19,500 View
  • 133 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
CrossRef is a membership association for scholarly publishers with a mission of improving scholarly communication through community collaboration. CrossRef now has over 5,000 publisher members, and a large proportion of these member publishers (over 80%) are small, international publishers. As such, CrossRef needs to put tools in place to help these smaller publishers fulfil the basic technical requirements of CrossRef membership and participate in optional CrossRef services—CrossCheck and CrossMark among others. This article will describe some of CrossRef ’s upcoming and recently launched tools for small publishers, detail how they work, and will let members know where they can find and make use of these applications. It will focus predominantly on the CrossRef linking console, the additions to the web deposit form and the CSV (comma separated value) upload improvements that have recently been released or are scheduled for release in the near future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ethical consideration of the use of generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT in writing a nursing article
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • How to successfully list a journal in the Social Science Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(4): 221.     CrossRef
CrossRef text and data mining services
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):22-27.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.32
  • 20,975 View
  • 202 Download
  • 28 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. It is a registration agency for the digital object identifier (DOI), and has built additional services for CrossRef members around the DOI and the bibliographic metadata that publishers deposit in order to register DOIs for their publications. Among these services are CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate, which helps publishers screen for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts and FundRef, which gives publishers standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research. To add to these services, Cross-Ref launched CrossRef text and data mining services in May 2014. This article will explain the thinking behind CrossRef launching this new service, what it offers to publishers and researchers alike, how publishers can participate in it, and the uptake of the service so far.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hidden limitations of analyses via alternative bibliometric services
    Libor Ansorge
    Scientometrics.2023; 128(3): 2031.     CrossRef
  • Tera-hertz (THz) catalysis on MXene for enhanced selectivity from CO2 to CO
    Ziao Wang, Yao Xu, Tao Feng, Chaojun Lei, Yu Zhao, Xi Zhu
    Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers.2023; 10(10): 2903.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Enable a Data-Oriented Experimental Design Approach for Producing Biochar and Hydrochar from Biomass
    Amauri J. Paula, Odair Pastor Ferreira, Antonio G. Souza Filho, Francisco Nepomuceno Filho, Carlos E. Andrade, Andreia F. Faria
    Chemistry of Materials.2022; 34(3): 979.     CrossRef
  • CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating
    Boris Alperin, Inna Zibareva, Aleksey Vedyagin
    Science Management: Theory and Practice.2022; 4(1): 143.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers
    Sen Liu, Aaron P. Stebner, Branden B. Kappes, Xiaoli Zhang
    Additive Manufacturing.2021; 39: 101877.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape
    Avishek Chatterjee, Cosimo Nardi, Cary Oberije, Philippe Lambin
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(4): 300.     CrossRef
  • Data-Driven Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Gas-Fluidized Beds Using Data Extracted by Text Mining
    Jibin Zhou, Duiping Liu, Mao Ye, Zhongmin Liu
    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.2021; 60(37): 13727.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for ocean science data integration: current state, gaps, and way forward
    Tomer Sagi, Yoav Lehahn, Koby Bar, Jody W. Deming, Lisa A. Miller
    Elem Sci Anth.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Citation.js: a format-independent, modular bibliography tool for the browser and command line
    Lars G. Willighagen
    PeerJ Computer Science.2019; 5: e214.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials
    Edward Kim, Kevin Huang, Alex Tomala, Sara Matthews, Emma Strubell, Adam Saunders, Andrew McCallum, Elsa Olivetti
    Scientific Data.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
How to apply CrossMark and FundRef via CrossRef extensible markup language
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):84-90.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.84
  • 20,424 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. In the 14 years since CrossRef launched, it has developed a number of services that hinge around the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and the publication metadata submitted to CrossRef by publishers registering DOIs. CrossMark and FundRef are two additional services from CrossRef that publishers can choose to participate in, and both require publishers to provide additional information with the bibliographic metadata provided within their CrossRef deposits. This article will aim to show what this additional metadata is, how it should be formatted and why, so that publishers can use it to enhance their content and participate in additional CrossRef services that benefit the scholarly communications industry.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
    Chris Fradkin, Rogério Mugnaini
    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3.     CrossRef
  • How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
    Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements
    Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Istvan S. Szilagyi, Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
    Science and Engineering Ethics.2016; 22(4): 1063.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh, Soo Young Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Xu-jie Zhou
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0163588.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • Journal’s step to leap to the international level and communication skill
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2014; 26(3): 159.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing