Purpose The objective of this study was to compare Scopus journals published in East Asian countries—China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan—in terms of their open access status and metrics and to explore the implications of those findings for South Korea.
Methods To conduct this study, we selected four East Asian countries: China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We used journal information provided by SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Scopus. The following parameters were analyzed for journals published in East Asian countries: open access status, subject categories, quartiles, number of published documents, h-index, publishers, and citation rate.
Results In all East Asian countries, numerous commercial publishers publish journals. One exception is Science Press, a Chinese government-sponsored publisher, which published the largest number of journals in the East Asian region. Japan had the highest median number of years covered by SJR. However, the proportion of Q1 journals in Japan was the lowest of the East Asian countries. South Korea had the highest proportion of Q1 journals in the country’s total journal production. Publishers in South Korea published more open access journals than any other East Asian country. Despite publishing a high proportion of prestigious journals, South Korea lagged behind China and Japan in the number of Scopus-indexed journals.
Conclusion The findings indicate that South Korea has made significant progress in locally producing influential journals over the years. However, more efforts to publish international journals are required for South Korea to increase the number of Scopus journals.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
In-Depth Examination of Coverage Duration: Analyzing Years Covered and Skipped in Journal Indexing Eungi Kim Publications.2024; 12(2): 10. CrossRef
Open access promotion methods are generally divided into the ‘gold road’ and the ‘green road.’ Asian countries most commonly focus on the gold road while others focus on the green road. According to data from the Directory of Open Access Journal and the Directory of Open Access Repositories, Indonesia has the largest number of open access journals in the world, while Japan has the third largest number of institutional repositories. In contrast, in Korea, the extensible markup language services of the original text of journal articles are more popular than other Asian countries. In this article, the current status of open access in Asian countries is investigated, and typical open access journal service platforms in Asian countries are reviewed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Open access theses and dissertations: current status and perspectives Nadim Akhtar Khan, S.M. Shafi Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Mohammad Nazim, Raj Kumar Bhardwaj Digital Library Perspectives.2023; 39(3): 371. CrossRef
Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 55. CrossRef
Otwarty dostęp w krajach globalnego Południa Małgorzata Glinicka Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne.2020; 58(1(115)): 56. CrossRef
CJK Languages or English: Languages Used by Academic Journals in China, Japan, and Korea Xiaomei Liu, Xiaotian Chen Journal of Scholarly Publishing.2019; 50(3): 201. CrossRef
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 100. CrossRef