Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Rachael Lammey"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Training Material
The research nexus and Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI): sharing our goal of an open, connected ecosystem of research objects
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2023;10(2):190-194.   Published online July 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.315
  • 1,451 View
  • 204 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
As a community, it is impossible to ignore the fact that sharing research and information related to research is a much broader proposition than sharing an article, book, or conference paper. In supporting an evolving scholarly record, making connections between research organizations, contributors, actions, and objects helps give a more complete picture of the scholarly record, which open infrastructure organizations like Crossref call the research nexus. Crossref is working to support this evolution and is thinking about the metadata it collects via its members and that it supplements and curates, to make it broader than the rigid structures traditionally provided by content types. Furthermore, because of Crossref’s commitment to the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI), this network of information will be global and openly available for anyone in the community to access and reuse. The present article describes this vision in more detail, including why it is increasingly important to support the links between research and elements that contribute or are related to that research; how Crossref, its members, and the wider community can support it; and the work and planning Crossref is doing to make it easier to achieve this.
Original Article
Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2020;7(2):125-129.   Published online August 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.206
  • 4,583 View
  • 86 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose: The 20th anniversary of Crossref is a good point to evaluate where Crossref stands with the communities it supports so that it can be in a position to serve their needs in the future.
Methods
This evaluation took the form of a survey and a series of interviews run by Shift Learning in mid-2019.
Results
Results are presented in the form of a report authored by Shift Learning which is discussed in this paper.
Conclusion
Overall, Crossref is appreciated and provides value for the scholarly community. However, it needs to make sure that it continues to serve key stakeholders, ensure that core systems work smoothly for all members and that they balance the needs of its different sizes of members and those who subscribe to or use the Crossref metadata. The report from Shift Learning makes specific recommendations regarding pricing, products and services and, communications which Crossref should consider to continue to address the needs of its diverse stakeholders

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

    Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S20.     CrossRef
  • Instructions for Authors Submitting Papers to Electrochemistry

    Electrochemistry.2021; 89(Announceme): S1.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
Essay
Solutions for identification problems: a look at the Research Organization Registry
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2020;7(1):65-69.   Published online February 20, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.192
  • 6,319 View
  • 129 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Missing institutions in OpenAlex: possible reasons, implications, and solutions
    Lin Zhang, Zhe Cao, Yuanyuan Shang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang
    Scientometrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared
    Lisa R. Johnston, Alicia Hofelich Mohr, Joel Herndon, Shawna Taylor, Jake R. Carlson, Lizhao Ge, Jennifer Moore, Jonathan Petters, Wendy Kozlowski, Cynthia Hudson Vitale, Ayesha Maqbool
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(4): e0302426.     CrossRef
  • OpenCitations Meta
    Arcangelo Massari, Fabio Mariani, Ivan Heibi, Silvio Peroni, David Shotton
    Quantitative Science Studies.2024; 5(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions
    Andreas Nishikawa-Pacher, Tamara Heck, Kerstin Schoch
    Research Evaluation.2023; 32(2): 228.     CrossRef
  • The current landscape of author guidelines in chemistry through the lens of research data sharing
    Nicole A. Parks, Tillmann G. Fischer, Claudia Blankenburg, Vincent F. Scalfani, Leah R. McEwen, Sonja Herres-Pawlis, Steffen Neumann
    Pure and Applied Chemistry.2023; 95(4): 439.     CrossRef
  • Measuring the Concept of PID Literacy: User Perceptions and Understanding of PIDs in Support of Open Scholarly Infrastructure
    George Macgregor, Barbara S. Lancho-Barrantes, Diane Rasmussen Pennington
    Open Information Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The bibliometric journey towards technological and social change: A review of current challenges and issues
    Daniel Torres-Salinas, Nicolás Robinson-García, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
    El Profesional de la información.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metadata in journal publishing
    Joppe Bos, Kevin McCurley
    TUGboat.2023; 44(1): 71.     CrossRef
  • Open reproducible scientometric research with Alexandria3k
    Diomidis Spinellis, Alberto Baccini
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294946.     CrossRef
  • A half-century of global collaboration in science and the “Shrinking World”
    Keisuke Okamura
    Quantitative Science Studies.2023; 4(4): 938.     CrossRef
  • Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate
    Stian Soiland-Reyes, Peter Sefton, Mercè Crosas, Leyla Jael Castro, Frederik Coppens, José M. Fernández, Daniel Garijo, Björn Grüning, Marco La Rosa, Simone Leo, Eoghan Ó Carragáin, Marc Portier, Ana Trisovic, RO-Crate Community, Paul Groth, Carole Goble
    Data Science.2022; 5(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • The prevalence and impact of university affiliation discrepancies between four bibliographic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, and Microsoft Academic
    Philip J. Purnell
    Quantitative Science Studies.2022; 3(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • Persistent Identification for Conferences
    Julian Franken, Aliaksandr Birukou, Kai Eckert, Wolfgang Fahl, Christian Hauschke, Christoph Lange
    Data Science Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Affiliation Information in DataCite Dataset Metadata: a Flemish Case Study
    Niek Van Wettere
    Data Science Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov
    Laura Miron, Rafael S. Gonçalves, Mark A. Musen
    Scientific Data.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Training Materials
How publishers can work with Crossref on data citation
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):166-170.   Published online July 5, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.165
  • 5,514 View
  • 171 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
It aims to explain why data citation is important, how publishers and data repositories can do this and what use will be made of the information they provide. There are large benefits to be accrued from sharing research data such as guarantee of reproducibility and transparency. Consistent citation practice around data is essential to helping these benefits to be realized. Data citation metadata is being disseminated and used through its application programming interfaces and the Event Data application programming interface. Event Data extracts this information into a separate service, so data citations are pre-filtered from the Crossref metadata. There are two methods by which publishers can register data citation information with Crossref. The first method is to deposit data citations in the citation section of the metadata, i.e., the part containing the reference list of the article. The second method publishers can use to register data citations with Crossref is to use the relationships section of the metadata. There are a number of services already using Event Data to show information on data citation. To achieve the benefits of data citation, publishers or editors should have a data sharing and citation policy so that they share with their authors and readers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science
    Geum Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 136.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
Using the Crossref Metadata API to explore publisher content
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2016;3(2):109-111.   Published online August 20, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.75
  • 13,680 View
  • 204 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Crossref is a not-for-profit membership association for scholarly publishers, founded in 2000. It is the largest digital object identifier (DOI) registration agency and provides publisher members with the capacity to deposit DOIs and their associated metadata to support persistent linking between different types of academic content. In a previous paper in Science Editing [1], Crossref mentioned a newly-created interface (http://search.crossref.org) that allowed publishers, libraries and researchers to search across nearly 50 million Crossref metadata records for items such as journal articles, books and conference proceedings. Since that paper was published, the search service has graduated into a live production service covering over 81 million DOIs, and Crossref has documented and made available the application programming interface used to build and support the search interface. This paper will provide information on this Crossref Metadata API, which is being widely adopted and used by many different stakeholders in the scholarly community, and give examples of how it is being employed by these parties.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Omer Benjakob, Rona Aviram, Jonathan Aryeh Sobel
    GigaScience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Low-Cost Assistive Technologies for Disabled People Using Open-Source Hardware and Software: A Systematic Literature Review
    Jonathan Alvarez Ariza, Joshua M. Pearce
    IEEE Access.2022; 10: 124894.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the role of single‐board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature review
    Jonathan Á. Ariza, Heyson Baez
    Computer Applications in Engineering Education.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
    Halil Kilicoglu
    Briefings in Bioinformatics.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
CrossRef tools for small publishers
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2015;2(2):79-85.   Published online August 14, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.48
  • 19,507 View
  • 133 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
CrossRef is a membership association for scholarly publishers with a mission of improving scholarly communication through community collaboration. CrossRef now has over 5,000 publisher members, and a large proportion of these member publishers (over 80%) are small, international publishers. As such, CrossRef needs to put tools in place to help these smaller publishers fulfil the basic technical requirements of CrossRef membership and participate in optional CrossRef services—CrossCheck and CrossMark among others. This article will describe some of CrossRef ’s upcoming and recently launched tools for small publishers, detail how they work, and will let members know where they can find and make use of these applications. It will focus predominantly on the CrossRef linking console, the additions to the web deposit form and the CSV (comma separated value) upload improvements that have recently been released or are scheduled for release in the near future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ethical consideration of the use of generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT in writing a nursing article
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • How to successfully list a journal in the Social Science Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(4): 221.     CrossRef
CrossRef text and data mining services
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2015;2(1):22-27.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.32
  • 20,982 View
  • 202 Download
  • 28 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. It is a registration agency for the digital object identifier (DOI), and has built additional services for CrossRef members around the DOI and the bibliographic metadata that publishers deposit in order to register DOIs for their publications. Among these services are CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate, which helps publishers screen for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts and FundRef, which gives publishers standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research. To add to these services, Cross-Ref launched CrossRef text and data mining services in May 2014. This article will explain the thinking behind CrossRef launching this new service, what it offers to publishers and researchers alike, how publishers can participate in it, and the uptake of the service so far.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hidden limitations of analyses via alternative bibliometric services
    Libor Ansorge
    Scientometrics.2023; 128(3): 2031.     CrossRef
  • Tera-hertz (THz) catalysis on MXene for enhanced selectivity from CO2 to CO
    Ziao Wang, Yao Xu, Tao Feng, Chaojun Lei, Yu Zhao, Xi Zhu
    Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers.2023; 10(10): 2903.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Enable a Data-Oriented Experimental Design Approach for Producing Biochar and Hydrochar from Biomass
    Amauri J. Paula, Odair Pastor Ferreira, Antonio G. Souza Filho, Francisco Nepomuceno Filho, Carlos E. Andrade, Andreia F. Faria
    Chemistry of Materials.2022; 34(3): 979.     CrossRef
  • CRIS Systems in Research Organization Administrating
    Boris Alperin, Inna Zibareva, Aleksey Vedyagin
    Science Management: Theory and Practice.2022; 4(1): 143.     CrossRef
  • Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers
    Sen Liu, Aaron P. Stebner, Branden B. Kappes, Xiaoli Zhang
    Additive Manufacturing.2021; 39: 101877.     CrossRef
  • Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape
    Avishek Chatterjee, Cosimo Nardi, Cary Oberije, Philippe Lambin
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(4): 300.     CrossRef
  • Data-Driven Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Gas-Fluidized Beds Using Data Extracted by Text Mining
    Jibin Zhou, Duiping Liu, Mao Ye, Zhongmin Liu
    Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.2021; 60(37): 13727.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for ocean science data integration: current state, gaps, and way forward
    Tomer Sagi, Yoav Lehahn, Koby Bar, Jody W. Deming, Lisa A. Miller
    Elem Sci Anth.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Citation.js: a format-independent, modular bibliography tool for the browser and command line
    Lars G. Willighagen
    PeerJ Computer Science.2019; 5: e214.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • The rapid internationalization of Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism as evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism.2017; 22(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials
    Edward Kim, Kevin Huang, Alex Tomala, Sara Matthews, Emma Strubell, Adam Saunders, Andrew McCallum, Elsa Olivetti
    Scientific Data.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef
How to apply CrossMark and FundRef via CrossRef extensible markup language
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):84-90.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.84
  • 20,429 View
  • 150 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. In the 14 years since CrossRef launched, it has developed a number of services that hinge around the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and the publication metadata submitted to CrossRef by publishers registering DOIs. CrossMark and FundRef are two additional services from CrossRef that publishers can choose to participate in, and both require publishers to provide additional information with the bibliographic metadata provided within their CrossRef deposits. This article will aim to show what this additional metadata is, how it should be formatted and why, so that publishers can use it to enhance their content and participate in additional CrossRef services that benefit the scholarly communications industry.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Open Science Indicators as Metadata Fields?
    Chris Fradkin, Rogério Mugnaini
    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3.     CrossRef
  • How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
    Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research's promotion to internationally competitive journal evidenced by journal metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research.2017; 6(2): 67.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with Ethical Issues Involving Animal Experiments and Identifiable Photographs in Articles Published in Archives of Plastic Surgery
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2017; 44(06): 475.     CrossRef
  • Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements
    Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Istvan S. Szilagyi, Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
    Science and Engineering Ethics.2016; 22(4): 1063.     CrossRef
  • How to Promote the Korean Journal of Child Studies to an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Child Studies.2016; 37(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh, Soo Young Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Xu-jie Zhou
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0163588.     CrossRef
  • How much is Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions promoted based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2015; 12: 57.     CrossRef
  • Journal’s step to leap to the international level and communication skill
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Medical Education.2014; 26(3): 159.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
The basics of CrossRef extensible markup language
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(2):76-83.   Published online August 18, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.76
  • 18,620 View
  • 101 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. Launched in 2000, CrossRef’s citation-linking network today covers over 68 million journal articles and other content items (books chapters, data, theses, and technical reports) from thousands of scholarly and professional publishers around the globe. CrossRef has over 4,000 member publishers who join as members in order to avail of a number of CrossRef services, reference linking via the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) being the core service. To deposit CrossRef DOIs, publishers and editors need to become familiar with the basics of extensible markup language (XML). This article will give an introduction to CrossRef XML and what publishers need to do in order to start to deposit DOIs with CrossRef and thus ensure their publications are discoverable and can be linked to consistently in an online environment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Practice of CrossRef extensible markup language coding and more advanced information for CrossRef deposits
    Rachael Lammey
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 91.     CrossRef
Review
CrossRef developments and initiatives: an update on services for the scholarly publishing community from CrossRef
Rachael Lammey
Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):13-18.   Published online February 13, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.13
  • 18,111 View
  • 151 Download
  • 36 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF

CrossRef (http://www.crossref.org) is a not-for-profit membership association of publishers. Since its founding in 2000, CrossRef has provided reference linking services for over 62 million scholarly content items, including journal articles, books and book chapters, conference proceedings, reference entries, technical reports, standards, and data sets. CrossRef also provides additional collaborative services designed to improve trust in the scholarly communications process, including Cited-By linking, CrossCheck plagiarism screening, CrossMark update identification, and the FundRef funder identification service. All of these services continue to develop to try to meet the evolving needs of publishers, and this article attempts to give an overview of them and highlight important updates which have taken place over the last 12 months.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council
    Bianca Kramer, Hans de Jonge
    Quantitative Science Studies.2022; 3(3): 583.     CrossRef
  • How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv
    Jialiang Lin, Yao Yu, Yu Zhou, Zhiyang Zhou, Xiaodong Shi
    Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 555.     CrossRef
  • Acesso aberto a artigos, dados e materiais de pesquisa na RBMFC
    Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Thiago Dias Sarti
    Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade.2020; 15(42): 2671.     CrossRef
  • Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature
    Daniel S Himmelstein, Ariel Rodriguez Romero, Jacob G Levernier, Thomas Anthony Munro, Stephen Reid McLaughlin, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Casey S Greene
    eLife.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Promotion ofNeurointerventionto International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2016; 11(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Gastric Cancer's Promotion to International Journal from the Perspective of Biliometric Analysis
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2016; 16(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery's Evolution into an International Journal Based on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2016; 8(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Status of digital standards in Korean medical journals in 2016
    Geum Hee Jeong, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Using the Crossref Metadata API to explore publisher content
    Rachael Lammey
    Science Editing.2016; 3(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has been made in journal metrics two years after the citation analysis of theKorean Journal of Urology?
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Urology.2015; 56(4): 276.     CrossRef
  • Evidence of the Internationalization ofClinical EndoscopyBased on Journal Metrics
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Scientific and academic journals in the Philippines: status and challenges
    Evelyn Mae Tecson-Mendoza
    Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 73.     CrossRef
  • Opinions of Korean science editors on open access policies, editorial difficulties, and government’s support for publishing
    Sun Huh, Hye-Min Cho, Hyungsun Kim
    Science Editing.2015; 2(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • The Elevation ofAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicineto the Status of an International Journal After Adopting an English-Only Policy
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2015; 39(5): 661.     CrossRef
  • Application of new information technologies to scholarly journals: ORCID, CrossMark, and FundRef
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(5): 455.     CrossRef
  • Editing and publishing scholarly journals in the internet age
    Kihong Kim
    Science Editing.2014; 1(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • How Far Has theInternational Neurourology JournalProgressed Since Its Transformation Into an English Language Journal?
    Sun Huh
    International Neurourology Journal.2014; 18(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics-Based Position ofDiabetes & Metabolism Journalafter the Change of Its Text Language to English
    Sun Huh
    Diabetes & Metabolism Journal.2014; 38(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Journal Article Tag Suite 1.0: National Information Standards Organization standard of journal extensible markup language
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2014; 1(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • How Journal Metrics Illustrate the Transformation of Archives of Plastic Surgery into an International Journal
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2014; 41(06): 617.     CrossRef
  • What is the position ofClinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicinein its scholarly journal network based on journal metrics?
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine.2014; 41(4): 147.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing