Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Previous issues
13 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 9 August 2022
Prev issue Next issue
Editorial
Thoughts on the long-term digital preservation of scholarly journals
Kihong Kim
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):95-96.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.273
  • 2,418 View
  • 261 Download
PDF
Original Articles
Status and factors associated with the adoption of data sharing policies in Asian journals
Jihyun Kim, Seo Young Bai
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):97-104.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.274
  • 4,291 View
  • 305 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study investigated the current status and factors associated with adopting data sharing policies in Asian journals. Data sharing policies vary by country and region, and few studies have examined the trends and factors related to these policies in journals across the Asian region.
Methods
The 2020 Scimago Journal and Country Rank was used to download data about 1,143 Asian journals indexed in Web of Science. Excluding 40 journals inaccessible via the Internet or without English-language websites and author guidelines, 1,103 journals were analyzed through descriptive statistical analyses and the chi-square test.
Results
Of the 1,103 journals, 325 (29.5%) had data sharing policies, showing a moderate level of policy adoption among Asian journals. The results of the chi-square test suggested that the impact factor and publisher type (whether a publisher was commercial) were significantly associated with the presence of data sharing policies in journals, but subject categories were not identified as a significant factor. Regarding the strength of data sharing policies, most journals provided policies that only encouraged data sharing.
Conclusion
Policies only encouraging data sharing are unlikely to lead to actual data sharing; thus, considering varying levels of policy strength and effective ways to induce authors’ compliance with the policies is important. Further research needs to examine other factors affecting the presence or strength of data sharing policies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Academic journal website from the user’s perspective
    A. V. Silnichaya, D. I. Trushkov, A. Volkova, M. S. Konyaev
    Science Editor and Publisher.2024; 9(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Analyzing AI use policy in LIS: association with journal metrics and publisher volume
    Eungi Kim
    Scientometrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analyzing Data Sharing Policies in Library and Information Science: Journal Metrics, Open Access Status, and Publisher Volume
    Eungi Kim, Kristine Joy Tabogoc, Jang Won Chae
    Publications.2024; 12(4): 39.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3.     CrossRef
Science beyond English: to what extent do Vietnamese scholars publish in non-English languages?
Van Luong Nguyen, Dinh-Hai Luong, Hiep-Hung Pham
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):105-111.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.275
  • 3,314 View
  • 286 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Although English has become the lingua franca for scholarly communication, scholars worldwide publish in other languages. Nevertheless, few studies have answered the question, “To what extent do scholars publish in non-English languages?” This study addresses that question, limiting its scope to Vietnamese scholars.
Methods
We reviewed 833 non-English documents authored by at least one scholar from Vietnam between 1960 and 2021, exploring aspects such as the language of the publication, the year of publication, the document type, number of document citations, the most prolific and most cited authors, and the primary research themes.
Results
Among non-English languages, French, Russian, and Chinese were the three most often selected by Vietnamese scholars for their publications. The year 2015 was a pivotal year when non-English publications from Vietnam significantly increased. Journal articles were the most common type of document, and the most frequent subject areas were medicine, agricultural and biological sciences, engineering, energy, and environmental science.
Conclusion
Although English is the primary language of science, the number of non-English documents by Vietnamese researchers has been increasing. This suggests that collaborative work between Vietnamese researchers and foreign researchers has also increased.
Trends in research on clinical reasoning in nursing over the past 20 years: a bibliometric analysis
Sukwon Hahn, Young Mi Ryu
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):112-119.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.276
  • 4,531 View
  • 351 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Clinical reasoning is an essential component of nursing education. This study aimed to identify the trends in research on clinical reasoning in nursing over a 22-year period.
Methods
The Web of Science Core Collection was used as the target database, with the search terms “clinical reasoning,” “clinical judgement,” and “clinical decision.” The scope of the search included the subject, abstract, author’s keywords, and Keywords Plus for each article. Our literature search included journal articles from 2000 to 2021, with the subject area restricted to nursing. A total of 4,675 articles met the inclusion criteria after the removal of duplicates using digital object identifier. We used bibliometric analyses to conduct quantitative and statistical analyses of publication trends, the journals and countries with the most publications, the most productive authors, the most globally cited documents, and the most frequent keywords.
Results
In nursing, studies related to clinical reasoning have increased significantly since 2000. The most prolific country has been the United States. The journal with the most publications was the Journal of Clinical Nursing. The most productive author was Considine J, with 23 publications. The most widely cited author was Tanner CA, with 614 citations. The most frequent keywords in the literature related to clinical reasoning were “care,” “nurses,” and “decision-making,” in that order.
Conclusion
This study examined the quantitative analysis and statistics of publications related to clinical reasoning in nursing in the past 20 years using bibliographic information. This study can help guide future research on clinical reasoning for nurse educators.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic analysis on real estate finance literature: A study on articles in Web of Science Core Collection Database
    Nurgün KOMŞUOĞLU YILMAZ
    Business Economics and Management Research Journal.2023; 6(1): 57.     CrossRef
Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study
Korean Council of Science Editors
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):120-135.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.277
  • 5,138 View
  • 305 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The variety, scope, and impact of open access (OA) diamond journals across disciplines and regions from July 22 to September 11, 2020 were charted to characterize the current OA diamond landscape.
Methods
The total number of diamond journals was estimated, including those outside the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The distribution across regions, disciplines, and publisher types was described. The scope of journals in terms of authorship and readership was investigated. Information was collected on linguistic diversity, journal dynamics and life cycle, and their visibility in scholarly databases.
Results
The number of OA diamond journals is estimated to be 29,000. OA diamond journals are estimated to publish 356,000 articles per year. The OA diamond sector is diverse in terms of regions (45% in Europe, 25% in Latin America, 16% in Asia, and 5% in the United States/Canada) and disciplines (60% humanities and social sciences, 22% sciences, and 17% medicine). More than 70% of OA diamond journals are published by university-owned publishers, including university presses. The majority of OA diamond journals are small, publishing fewer than 25 articles a year. English (1,210), Spanish (492), and French (342) are the most common languages of the main texts. Out of 1,619 journals, 1,025 (63.3%) are indexed in DOAJ, 492 (30.4%) in Scopus, and 321 (19.8%) in Web of Science.
Conclusion
The patterns and trends reported herein provide insights into the diversity and importance of the OA diamond journal landscape and the accompanying opportunities and challenges in supporting this publishing model.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 76(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • How open access diamond journals comply with industry standards exemplified by Plan S technical requirements

    Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the Journal Impact Factor, 4.4 for the first time on June 28, 2023
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 21.     CrossRef
  • Plan S: estimating future developments
    Johan Rooryck
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 149.     CrossRef
Ukrainian scientific TV programs and YouTube channels as a distraction from war news on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: a survey-based observational study and a content analysis
Roksolana Kravchenko
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):136-141.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.278
  • 5,190 View
  • 252 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study examined whether popular science journalism can be a distraction from war news, as the life of all citizens in Ukraine has changed significantly since the beginning of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
Methods
This article presents an audience survey on whether they viewed science content as a distraction from war news. In addition, an analysis of 10 Ukrainian YouTube channels was conducted. All videos that were published after February 24, 2022, the start date of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, were processed.
Results
Out of 460 audience members of TV programs and YouTube channels, 64.8% of respondents considered watching popular science or entertainment programs as a distraction from the war. An analysis of the content of popular science YouTube channels during the first 2 months of the war showed that every active channel was reformatted according to the realities of wartime. In addition, the audience survey demonstrated that even during the war, this type of content has remained relevant.
Conclusion
The Ukrainian audience needed scientific content as a distraction from the war. The majority of respondents, regardless of gender, needed to divert their attention from military operations. Ukrainian science journalists also joined the information war against the foreign invasion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Popular Science Journalism as an Element of Educational Programs
    Roksolana Kravchenko
    Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism.2023; (1 (82)): 97.     CrossRef
  • The Role and Development of Popular Science TV Programs During Times of MilitaryActions
    Roksolana Kravchenko
    Current Issues of Mass Communication.2023; (34): 71.     CrossRef
Essays
Why consistent, clear, and uniform instructions for authors are required
Jean Iwaz
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):142-145.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.279
  • 2,576 View
  • 229 Download
PDF
Why do journals publish research protocols?
Soo Young Kim
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):146-148.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.280
  • 2,550 View
  • 252 Download
PDF
Plan S: estimating future developments
Johan Rooryck
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):149-154.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.281
  • 3,667 View
  • 241 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Open access mirror journals: an experiment in brand loyalty
    Libor Ansorge
    Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 154.     CrossRef
Life as an editor of the Journal of Stroke, my third and most vulnerable child
Jong S. Kim
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):155-158.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.282
  • 2,098 View
  • 218 Download
PDF
Meeting Report
Meeting report on the 16th EASE General Assembly and Conference
Jun-Beom Park
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):159-161.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.283
  • 2,394 View
  • 235 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Attendance at conferences for researchers and editorial boards: the post-COVID landscape
    Jun-Beom Park, Shin-Young Park, Jung-Chul Park, Yong-Gun Kim, Hwan Tae Ahn, Seung-Yun Shin
    Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science.2024; 54(3): 137.     CrossRef
Training Materials
Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
Younsang Cho
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):162-168.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.284
  • 4,230 View
  • 261 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
There are many ways to use open source code to implement digital standards for scholarly journal publishing. However, providing digital services using open-source code can be a challenge, especially for small and local academic society journals. This paper provides some critical examples of using some of the many open-source code resources available to the public. Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) Extensible Markup Language (XML) has been established as an essential tool, and is now used by most journals for digital publication. JATS XML can be converted to other viewer formats, including Extensible Hypertext Markup Language, PubReader, and EPUB 3.0. It can also be used to create dynamic interactive PDFs. It can be converted to other XMLs, incluing Crossref XML, PubMed XML, and DOAJ XML. Open-source code published on GitHub, National Information Standards Organization, and the US National Library of Medicine can be used for Crossref XML deposition for digital object identifier and Crossmark stamp registration. These examples of open-source code need to be implemented on journal websites to provide local academic journal publishers with various critical functions. This paper provides instructions on the best ways to realize these digital standards so that journal content can be provided to readers in a more friendly and effective way.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Artificial intelligence in scholarly publishing and the role of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors in the Asia-Pacific region
    Young Yoo
    Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions received the top-ranking Journal Impact Factor―9.3—in the category of Education, Scientific Disciplines in the 2023 Journal Citation Ranking by Clarivate
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 16.     CrossRef
  • Academic journal website from the user’s perspective
    A. V. Silnichaya, D. I. Trushkov, A. Volkova, M. S. Konyaev
    Science Editor and Publisher.2024; 9(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Why do editors of local nursing society journals strive to have their journals included in MEDLINE? A case study of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
    Sun Huh
    Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2023; 29(3): 147.     CrossRef
Improving Journal Article Tag Suite for multilingual articles
Vincent Lizzi
Sci Ed. 2022;9(2):169-178.   Published online August 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.285
  • 3,105 View
  • 214 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
The scenarios for journal articles that contain more than one language are no longer (and never really were) limited to having an article’s title, abstract, and keywords translated to additional languages. Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) currently has a variety of structures for tagging articles that are in multiple languages or have substantial amounts of content in more than one language. However, these structures are not all coherent and are not up to the tasks of handling some common use cases. A subcommittee of the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) JATS Standing Committee (with participation from members of the Standards Tag Suite (STS) and Book Interchange Tag Suite (BITS) committees and some other invited experts) was formed, in 2021, with the goal of recommending changes to JATS to enable it to usefully encode multilingual articles. The subcommittee has recommended a set of changes that introduce new structures that can be available to JATS users who need them while minimizing the burden JATS users who rarely deal with multilingual content. Most of these changes are backward compatible with earlier versions of JATS. These changes are currently a work in progress and may become available in a future version of JATS. This paper presents a proposal for improving JATS to better support tagging multilingual articles with the hope of garnering feedback and suggestions from the JATS community.

Science Editing : Science Editing
TOP