Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Previous issues
17 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 6 February 2019
Prev issue Next issue
Editorial
Implementing the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing
Kihong Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):1-2.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.148
  • 5,491 View
  • 152 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis
    Emily Ford
    Insights the UKSG journal.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
Reviews
Overview of disciplinary data sharing practices and promotion of open data in science
Jihyun Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):3-9.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.149
  • 6,287 View
  • 200 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The present study specifies the historical development of data sharing practices in three disciplines—oceanography, ecology, and genomics—along with the evolving progress of movements—e-Science, cyberinfrastructure, and open science—that expedite data sharing in more diverse disciplines. The review of these disciplinary data-sharing practices and the movements suggests opportunities and challenges that would serve as a basis for implementing data-sharing practices. The increasing need for large-scale and interdisciplinary research provides momentum for initiating data sharing. In addition, the development of data repositories and standards for metadata and data format facilitates data sharing. However, challenges need to be addressed, in regard to conflicting issues of patenting data, concerns about privacy and confidentiality, and informed consent that adequately enables data sharing. It is also necessary to consider the needs of the various stakeholders involved in data sharing to incentivize them to improve its impact.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
    Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
    Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning-empowered crop breeding: intelligent, efficient and promising
    Xiaoding Wang, Haitao Zeng, Limei Lin, Yanze Huang, Hui Lin, Youxiong Que
    Frontiers in Plant Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Corporate Data Sharing, Leakage, and Supervision Mechanism Research
    Haifei Yu, Xinyu He
    Sustainability.2021; 13(2): 931.     CrossRef
  • Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing
    Troy J. Bouffard, Ekaterina Uryupova, Klaus Dodds, Vladimir E. Romanovsky, Alec P. Bennett, Dmitry Streletskiy
    Land.2021; 10(6): 590.     CrossRef
  • Understanding Research Data Repositories as Infrastructures
    Ceilyn Boyd
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2021; 58(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Bringing Code to Data: Do Not Forget Governance
    Christine Suver, Adrian Thorogood, Megan Doerr, John Wilbanks, Bartha Knoppers
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(7): e18087.     CrossRef
  • Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493.     CrossRef
The 30-year publication history of Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Jong Kyu Ha, Cheol Heui Yun
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):10-18.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.150
  • 7,810 View
  • 129 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) is the official journal of the Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies and was founded in 1988 in Korea. The journal was created to serve the animal industry and academia in the Asian-Australasian region through the efficient publication and distribution of scientific information on animal sciences. At the beginning, there was neither a real need expressed by member countries nor a firm belief in the success of such publication activity in Asia. However, a few dedicated individuals, led by Prof. In K. Han, the first editor-in-chief, were able to turn AJAS into one of the most respected global journals in animal sciences. Over the last three decades, AJAS has achieved notable development in the quantity and quality of the articles and their publication process. AJAS initially published four issues per year; this number grew to six issues in 1995-1998, eight issues in 1999, and 12 issues from 2000 onward. Overall, the journal has published more than 5,700 articles. Total citation frequency in 1997, when AJAS was first indexed by SCIE, was lower than 100, but by 2017, it was more than 4,000. Similar improvement was seen in the two-year impact factor, which was 0.094 in 1997 and rose to 1.243 by 2017. This article aims to introduce the development of the AJAS editorial system, manuscript submission, publication activities, and citation frequency. Additionally, a special development, called the AJAS 2020 program, is introduced as a reference for other journals.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Leadership of AAAP scientists and journals in animal science: achievements, limitations, and challenges
    Jong K. Ha
    Animal Bioscience.2023; 36(1): 1.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Current and planned adoption of data sharing policies by editors of Korean scholarly journals
Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):19-24.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.151
  • 7,133 View
  • 171 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study analyzed the present status of data sharing polices and attitudes towards such policies through a web-based survey of editors of scholarly journals published in Korea.
Methods
From December 26, 2018 to January 3, 2019, a survey was distributed to 1,055 persons listed in the member directories of both the Korean Council of Science Editors and the Korean Federation of Science & Technology Societies. The survey contained four items on subjects’ information, three items that gathered information about the journals, and two further items on reasons for adopting or not adopting a data sharing policy and further opinions about such policies.
Results
Of the 100 respondents (from 100 journals), 13 stated that their journals had already adopted a data sharing policy. The strength of the policy was recommendation-only in 10 of those 13 journals. The most frequent reason for adopting a data sharing policy was to follow international trends. The repository sites were the Harvard Dataverse for two journals and Mendeley Data for one. The most common reasons for not adopting a data sharing policy were a lack of knowledge on data sharing, the possibility that submitters would not want to share their data, and the questionable effect of data sharing on scientific development.
Conclusion
Data sharing policies were uncommon among Korean scholarly journals. The advantages and disadvantages of adopting such policies should be discussed more actively among editors and researchers. Furthermore, data sharing infrastructure and training courses are required for data sharing policies to be established in scholarly journals in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Korean scholarly journal editors’ and publishers’ attitudes towards journal data sharing policies and data papers (2023): a survey-based descriptive study
    Hyun Jun Yi, Youngim Jung, Hyekyong Hwang, Sung-Nam Cho
    Science Editing.2023; 10(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics
    Yu Wang, Beibei Chen, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng
    Learned Publishing.2022; 35(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Ten Tips for Performing Your First Peer Review: The Next Step for the Aspiring Academic Plastic Surgeon
    Martin Frendø, Andreas Frithioff, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(04): 538.     CrossRef
  • Status and factors associated with the adoption of data sharing policies in Asian journals
    Jihyun Kim, Seo Young Bai
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals
    Brian Jackson
    Publications.2021; 9(2): 25.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • How to Deal with the Concept of Authorship and the Approval of an Institutional Review Board When Writing and Editing Journal Articles
    Sun Huh
    Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance.2020; 42(2): 63.     CrossRef
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science
    Geum Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 136.     CrossRef
  • How Annals of Dermatology Has Improved the Scientific Quality and Ethical Standards of its Articles in the Two-Year Period since October 2018
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Dermatology.2020; 32(5): 353.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
  • Data sharing policies of journals in life, health, and physical sciences indexed in Journal Citation Reports
    Jihyun Kim, Soon Kim, Hye-Min Cho, Jae Hwa Chang, Soo Young Kim
    PeerJ.2020; 8: e9924.     CrossRef
  • Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
    Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112.     CrossRef
  • Recent trends in medical journals’ data sharing policies and statements of data availability
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(06): 493.     CrossRef
  • Strategie postępowania z danymi badawczymi w polskich i zagranicznych czasopismach reprezentujących nauki historyczne
    Adam Jachimczyk
    Studia Medioznawcze.2019; 21(1): 475.     CrossRef
Network analysis of scientific collaboration in North Korea
Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):25-34.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.152
  • 6,538 View
  • 177 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although North Korea invests in scientific research, few selected research results are published to international journals. However, the latest peaceful political developments around North Korea have increased concerns about how they will support international scientific cooperation. This study aims to analyze the scientific collaboration and intellectual structure of North Korean researchers.
Methods
We conducted a co-word analysis with author keywords and author names using the Web of Science records for 1976–2018 to observe the changes in research trends in North Korea. The structure of the median centrality of words and the parallel nearest neighbor clustering methods were used to visualize the results.
Results
The analysis of 55 final keywords confirms that the corresponding network is composed of 17 sub-clusters under four areas. As a result of the investigation of 56 final author names, the corresponding network is composed of 15 sub-clusters under four areas.
Conclusion
As more accurate information is needed about collaboration partners to ensure successful cooperation, this analysis result can support getting an overview of North Korea’s research community and their research network.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022: a bibliometric study
    Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon
    Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Tracking North Korean economic transformation and trends in economic research
    Justin V. Hastings, Haneol Lee
    Asia and the Global Economy.2023; 3(1): 100050.     CrossRef
  • Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2022; 42(3): 321.     CrossRef
  • Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks
    Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim
    Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea
    Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim
    Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric analysis of research on the maize based on top papers during 2009-2019
    Bao-Zhong Yuan, Jie Sun
    COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management.2020; 14(1): 75.     CrossRef
Bibliographic and content analysis of physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018
Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):35-40.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.153
  • 6,515 View
  • 159 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
It aimed at assessing the current status of physics research in North Korea through a bibliographic and content analysis of the physics papers from North Korea indexed in the Scopus from 2005 to 2018.
Methods
The Scopus was searched on January 18, 2019 by using the search option ‘Affiliation city’ with “Pyongyang OR Chongjin OR Hamhung OR Sariwon OR Wonsan OR Kimchaek” as the city name and 171 physics papers from North Korea written in English were identified. By performing supplementary searches based on the author names and the references, 46 papers belonging to physics were added and the total of 217 papers were identified. They were classified by publication year, co-authors’ country, institution, subfield, journal and author. Representative North Korean physicists and the active subfields of physics were identified.
Results
The number of physics papers from North Korea has been growing rapidly in the recent years. Physics research activities in North Korea were extremely centralized in its capital, Pyongyang, where all major research institutions were located. Major research areas included condensed matter physics, optics and high energy physics and the large majority of papers were theoretical ones. From a bibliographic and content analysis, sixteen representative or notable physicists in North Korea were identified.
Conclusion
It appears that the North Korean government is actively encouraging researchers to publish more papers in international journals. There is a strong growth potential in physics research in North Korea. In order to achieve balanced development in physics, it is an important task to build competitive experimental groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Co-authorship network analysis of North Korean chemistry researchers based on issues of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering published from 2008 to 2022: a bibliometric study
    Eunmi Park, Ho-Yeol Yoon
    Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Mapping the development of North Korea's domestic nuclear research networks
    Philip Baxter, Justin V. Hastings, Philseo Kim, Man‐Sung Yim
    Review of Policy Research.2022; 39(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study
    Sun Huh
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 641.     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018
    Cuong Huu Nguyen, Loc Thi My Nguyen, Trung Tran, Tien-Trung Nguyen
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • A critical examination of international research conducted by North Korean authors: Increasing trends of collaborative research between China and North Korea
    Eungi Kim, Eun Sil Kim
    Scientometrics.2020; 124(1): 429.     CrossRef
Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals
Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):41-46.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.154
  • 7,981 View
  • 154 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aims to analyze the digital standards of Asian journals registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) which has been recognized as an index of quality for open access journals.
Methods
Data including 54 fields of each journal listed in DOAJ were provided by the DOAJ team in June 5, 2018. We focused on 11 fields including digital standards, content licensing types and digital archiving policy.
Results
Based on raw data from DOAJ from June 5, 2018, there are 11,534 journals registered in the directory. Among all journals in the directory, Asian journals comprise 1,972 journals from 18 countries. Indonesian journals rank at the top for Asian journals, with 1,322 journals originating from that country. Other major Asian countries’ registration status includes India (238), South Korea (82), China (80), Malaysia (45), Pakistan (39), Taiwan (30), Thailand (27), Japan (20), and Hong Kong (20). Eighty percent of journals (1,584) are using PDF-only as their full-text format, and DOI is adopted in 852 journals (43%). Almost 98% of journals (1,936) are having a Creative Commons license; however, 85% of journals (1,689) do not have a digital archiving policy.
Conclusion
Generally, digital standards are well implemented in South Korea, and digital archiving/deposit policy is well accepted in Indian journals. Many Asian open access journal editors can refer to this study result when they digitalize their journals in order to meet global standards.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Digital Archiving Policies of Central European Journals Registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals
    Branka Marijanović, Hrvoje Stančić
    Libri.2023; 73(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Open-source code to convert Journal Article Tag Suite Extensible Markup Language (JATS XML) to various viewers and other XML types for scholarly journal publishing
    Younsang Cho
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 162.     CrossRef
  • Compliance of “Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing” in academic society published journals
    Hyung Wook Choi, Ye Jin Choi, Soon Kim
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 112.     CrossRef
Comparison between Korean and foreign authors concerning the citation impact of Korean journals indexed in Scopus
Hyunju Jang, Ki Woo Chun, Hyungsun Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):47-57.   Published online November 8, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.147
  • 12,186 View
  • 195 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
An aim of this study is to analyze the citation impact of articles and reviews that were published in engineering, materials science, and medical journals in Korea over the 5-year period from 2012 to 2016 based on authors’ countries. These three subject areas were selected to provide insights regarding citation impact because they are better represented than other subjects among the 248 Korean journals indexed by Scopus.
Methods
We classified authors’ as Korean and foreign to assess and compare the citation impact of articles and reviews according to the authors’ countries and evaluated whether bibliometric indicators, such as the number of authors and the view count, were associated with a higher citation impact.
Results
We found that the citations count and publications in the top 10 citation percentile in these three subject areas were higher for reviews than for articles; further, the citation impact of articles and reviews by foreign authors was higher than that of articles and reviews by Korean authors. The number of authors had a weak relationship with citation impact based on the subject area, and the number of authors per review by foreign authors in materials science and medicine was negatively associated with citation impact. Moreover, the views count was found to be positively associated with the citation impact of publications in these three subject areas.
Conclusion
Considering these findings, future research should explore more bibliometric indicators, subject areas, and countries in order to develop practical applications. The results of this study provide insights and statistical evidence indicating that journal publishers and editors in Korea should attempt to attract more publications by foreign authors and promote their publications to increase their visibility and likelihood of being cited.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
    Sun Huh
    Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between publication indicators and citation impact indicators for publications in business, management, and accounting listed in Scopus from 2015 to 2019
    Hyunju Jang
    Science Editing.2021; 8(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Korean journals rejected by Scopus since 2011
    Hyunju Jang
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Research Performance and Trends in Environmental Science
    Won-Gi Shin, Moon-Ki Park, Da-Hyeon Kim, Hyun-Ju Jang, Tae-Sun Min
    Journal of Environmental Science International.2020; 29(3): 283.     CrossRef
Essays
The first year of the Crossref Ambassador Program: highlights and challenges
Vanessa Fairhurst
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):58-63.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.155
  • 6,246 View
  • 135 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?
    Anne-Wil Harzing
    Scientometrics.2019; 120(1): 341.     CrossRef
Scientific communication in the 21st century: Tweeting, Facebook Likes, and everything in-between
Basil D’Souza
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):64-68.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.156
  • 9,202 View
  • 142 Download
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • MEANS OF SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION IN FORMING RESEARCH COMPETENCE OF FUTURE PSYCHOLOGIST
    Roman Pavliuk, Iryna Kohut
    The Pedagogical Process: Theory and Practice.2019; (3-4): 59.     CrossRef
Bronze, free, or fourrée: an open access commentary
Eamon Costello
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):69-72.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.157
  • 7,315 View
  • 136 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mapping the German Diamond Open Access Journal Landscape
    Niels Taubert, Linda Sterzik, Andre Bruns
    Minerva.2024; 62(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • A User-Friendly Dashboard for Tracking Global Open Access Performance
    James P. Diprose, Richard Hosking, Richard Rigoni, Aniek Roelofs, Tuan-Yow Chien, Kathryn Napier, Katie Wilson, Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, Rebecca N. Handcock, Lucy Montgomery, Cameron Neylon
    The Journal of Electronic Publishing.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Testing the Robustness of COPE’s Characterization of Predatory Publishing on a COPE Member Publisher (Academic and Business Research Institute)
    Salim Moussa, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
    Publishing Research Quarterly.2023; 39(4): 337.     CrossRef
  • The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges
    Leigh-Ann Butler, Lisa Matthias, Marc-André Simard, Philippe Mongeon, Stefanie Haustein
    Quantitative Science Studies.2023; 4(4): 778.     CrossRef
  • The Open-Access Availability of Criminological Research to Practitioners and Policy Makers
    Matthew P J Ashby
    Journal of Criminal Justice Education.2021; 32(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Imperial College London's COVID‐19 research outputs
    Robyn Price, Yusuf Ozkan
    Learned Publishing.2021; 34(3): 358.     CrossRef
  • Academic publishing and open access: Costs, benefits and options for publishing research
    Christopher May
    Politics.2020; 40(1): 120.     CrossRef
Personal data protection of academic journals in the age of the European General Data Protection Regulation: guidelines for Korean journals
Juyoen Lee, Eric Yong Joong Lee
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):73-77.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.158
  • 6,323 View
  • 152 Download
PDF
Meeting Reports
Review of the Board of Editors in the Life Sciences certification examination
Yunhoe Kim
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):78-79.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.159
  • 4,636 View
  • 85 Download
PDF
Publication ethics workshop: how to cope with predatory journals
Jong-Ho Park
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):80-82.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.160
  • 4,640 View
  • 89 Download
PDF
2018 Intermediate-level training course for manuscript editors
Byung-Ho Yoon
Sci Ed. 2019;6(1):83-84.   Published online February 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.161
  • 4,320 View
  • 95 Download
PDF

Science Editing : Science Editing