Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Science Editing : Science Editing

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Previous issues
21 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 5 February 2018
Prev issue Next issue
Editorial
Science Editing is indexed in the Scopus
Kihong Kim
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):1-1.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.110
  • 8,277 View
  • 218 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Presidential address: How to cope with the present environment of scholarly journal publishing
    Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 1.     CrossRef
Reviews
Journal Article Tag Suite subset and Schematron: achieving the right balance
Alexander B. Schwarzman
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):2-15.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.111
  • 10,210 View
  • 183 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Ensuring that published content adheres to the publisher’s business and style rules requires the implementation of quality-control solutions that encompass the entire enterprise, including vendors and in-house staff. The solutions must span the entire life cycle of the manuscript, from extensible markup language conversion to production to post-publication enhancements. Two techniques that may help in achieving this goal are developing Schematron and making a Journal Article Tag Suite subset. Both come with costs: Schematron change management requires development and maintenance of an extensive testbase; making a subset requires comprehensive content analysis and the knowledge of the publishing program’s direction. Achieving the right balance between the two techniques may reduce the costs associated with them.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
    Sun Huh
    Ultrasonography.2020; 39(3): 238.     CrossRef
  • Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44.     CrossRef
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
    Sun Huh
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
    Sun Huh
    Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219.     CrossRef
Overview of journal metrics
Kihong Kim, Yeonok Chung
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):16-20.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.112
  • 15,097 View
  • 428 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. The impact factor and related metrics including the immediacy index and the aggregate impact factor, which are provided by the Journal Citation Reports, are explained in detail. The Eigenfactor score and the article influence score are also reviewed. In addition, journal metrics such as CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, SCImago Journal Rank, h-index, and g-index are discussed. Limitations and problems that these metrics have are pointed out. We should be cautious to rely on those quantitative measures too much when we evaluate journals or researchers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review
    Mina Moradzadeh, Shahram Sedghi, Sirous Panahi
    Scientometrics.2023; 128(1): 279.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
    Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, Valerie Chow, Sharleen G. Maduranayagam, Lucas J. Santoro, Lindsey Sikora, Ana Marusic, Daniel Shanahan, Randy Townsend, Alan Ehrlich, Alfonso Iorio, David Moher, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0282168.     CrossRef
  • A multidimensional journal evaluation framework based on the Pareto‐dominated set measured by the Manhattan distance
    Xinxin Xu, Ziqiang Zeng, Yurui Chang
    Learned Publishing.2023; 36(4): 619.     CrossRef
  • Journal quality criteria: Measurement and significance
    O. V. Kirillova, E. V. Tikhonova
    Science Editor and Publisher.2022; 7(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence algorithms used for microbial fuel cell research
    Luis Erick Coy-Aceves, Benito Corona-Vasquez
    Water Practice and Technology.2022; 17(10): 2071.     CrossRef
  • Predicting the citation count and CiteScore of journals one year in advance
    William L. Croft, Jörg-Rüdiger Sack
    Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(4): 101349.     CrossRef
  • The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20.     CrossRef
  • Kind Attention to the Altitude of Altmetrics
    Shekar Shobana
    Brazilian Dental Journal.2020; 31(5): 457.     CrossRef
  • Comments on “Scientificity and H-Index.”
    Ali Yavuz KARAHAN
    Acta Medica Alanya.2020; 4(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics
    Ernesto Roldan-Valadez, Shirley Yoselin Salazar-Ruiz, Rafael Ibarra-Contreras, Camilo Rios
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2019; 188(3): 939.     CrossRef
  • CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index
    Chris James, Lisa Colledge, Wim Meester, Norman Azoulay, Andrew Plume
    Learned Publishing.2019; 32(4): 367.     CrossRef
  • High Impact and Highly Cited Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications by Canadian Occupational Therapy Authors: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Ted Brown, Yuh-Shan Ho, Sharon A. Gutman
    Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2019; 33(4): 329.     CrossRef
  • Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
    Judit Dobránszki, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
    Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 387.     CrossRef
  • A New Metric for the Analysis of the Scientific Article Citation Network
    Livia Lin-Hsuan Chang, Frederick Kin Hing Phoa, Junji Nakano
    IEEE Access.2019; 7: 132027.     CrossRef
  • Bibliographic measures of top-tier finance and information systems journals
    Thomas Krueger, Jack Shorter
    Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.2019; 12(5): 841.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
  • Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
    Sun Huh
    Infection & Chemotherapy.2018; 50(3): 219.     CrossRef
Publication contracts and their legal interpretation in Korea
Seung Jong Oh
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):21-25.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.113
  • 9,247 View
  • 179 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
This study intends to help editors and publishers understand what to be aware of when signing a publishing contract in Korea. The legal interpretation of publishing rights may vary depending on the type of contract. It is vital for publishers to understand the different characteristics of each type of contract: author-publisher agreements, establishment of publishing rights, transfer of the author’s economic rights, and lump-sum agreements. Lump-sum agreements are a unique practice common in Korea, in which intellectual copyright is transferred upon a one-time lump-sum payment. Decisions regarding the infringement of publication rights in a given case will be rendered in accordance with the specific aspects of the relevant type of publication rights, and the work in question must be reviewed to determine whether it shows substantial similarity or sameness in order to prepare for any potential issues. Meanwhile, in Korea, electronic publishing requires an additional agreement separate from the printing publication agreement, but regulations regarding electronic publishing shall be confirmed through international agreements after considering the specific statutes and practices of publication in each country, as legal statutes and their interpretation may vary widely. Editors and publishers of academic papers and books must be aware of the various types of publishing contracts in practice.
Open access full-text databases in Asian countries
Tae-Sul Seo
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):26-31.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.114
  • 10,354 View
  • 237 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Open access promotion methods are generally divided into the ‘gold road’ and the ‘green road.’ Asian countries most commonly focus on the gold road while others focus on the green road. According to data from the Directory of Open Access Journal and the Directory of Open Access Repositories, Indonesia has the largest number of open access journals in the world, while Japan has the third largest number of institutional repositories. In contrast, in Korea, the extensible markup language services of the original text of journal articles are more popular than other Asian countries. In this article, the current status of open access in Asian countries is investigated, and typical open access journal service platforms in Asian countries are reviewed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies
    Mohammad Nazim, Raj Kumar Bhardwaj
    Digital Library Perspectives.2023; 39(3): 371.     CrossRef
  • Proposal for the development of a national open access database in Vietnam and comparison with other Asian countries’ national literature databases
    Loc My Thi Nguyen, Tien-Trung Nguyen, Thanh Thi Nghiem, Hien Thu Thi Le, Thao Phuong Thi Trinh, Thuan Van Pham, Thanh Chi Nguyen, Linh Khanh Hoang, Trung Tran
    Science Editing.2020; 7(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Otwarty dostęp w krajach globalnego Południa
    Małgorzata Glinicka
    Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne.2020; 58(1(115)): 56.     CrossRef
  • CJK Languages or English: Languages Used by Academic Journals in China, Japan, and Korea
    Xiaomei Liu, Xiaotian Chen
    Journal of Scholarly Publishing.2019; 50(3): 201.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
    Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 100.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Language policy and the disengagement of the international academic elite
John Harbord
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):32-38.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.115
  • 13,247 View
  • 216 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
This paper explores the phenomena of academic multiliteracy (the habit of writing academically in more than one language) and of L2 monoliteracy (that of only writing academically in a language that is not one’s own) and their impact on policy. Based on interviews and surveys conducted with 33 multiliterate and 15 L2 monoliterate scholars connected to one university in Central Europe between 2010 and 2014, I show how incentives to publish in English constructed by educational policies often push ambitious young researchers whose first language is not English away from engaging in academic and societal debates in their first language community. They may thus disengage from the national community, with negative consequences for the interaction between global and local that is essential for good governance. To overcome the difficulty young scholars encounter in writing in their native languages, they should be taught writing both in their native language and in English. Furthermore, university and state policies should reward scholars for writing not only for the international community but also for local society.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • EMI, power and expressivism
    René Gabriëls, Robert Wilkinson
    Journal of English-Medium Instruction.2024; 3(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
    Sun Huh
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137.     CrossRef
Authors’ perspectives on academic publishing: initial observations from a large-scale global survey
Basil D’Souza, Sneha Kulkarni, Clarinda Cerejo
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):39-43.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.116
  • 12,593 View
  • 243 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Authors are at the heart of academic publishing, but their voices are underrepresented in discussions about improving the academic publishing system. To understand the viewpoints of authors on various aspects of academic publishing and the challenges they face, we developed a large-scale survey entitled “Author perspectives on the academic publishing process” and made it available in December 2016. The survey has received 8,795 responses; this paper is based on the interim results drawn from 5,293 survey responses, and presents some interesting and thought-provoking trends that were observed in the authors’ responses, such as their interpretation of plagiarism and decisive factors in journal selection, as well as their thoughts on what needs to change in the publishing system for it to be more author-friendly. Some of the most important findings of the survey were: (1) the majority of the authors found manuscript preparation to be the most challenging task in the publication process, (2) the impact factor of a journal was reported to be the most important consideration for journal selection, (3) most authors found journal guidelines to be incomplete, (4) major gaps existed in author-journal communication, and (5) although awareness of ethics was high, awareness of good publication practice standards was low. Moreover, more than half of the participants indicated that among areas for improvement in the publishing system, they would like to see changes in the time it takes to publish a paper, the peer review process, and the fairness and objectivity of the publication process. These findings indicate the necessity of making the journal publication process more author-centered and smoothing the way for authors to get published.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review
    Xiaoting Xu, Juan Xie, Jianjun Sun, Ying Cheng
    Learned Publishing.2023; 36(2): 285.     CrossRef
  • Authors' choice between parent and mirror journals of Elsevier
    Sumiko Asai
    Learned Publishing.2023; 36(2): 299.     CrossRef
  • Video or perish? An analysis of video abstract author guidelines
    Jianxin Liu
    Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.2022; 54(2): 230.     CrossRef
  • Why consistent, clear, and uniform instructions for authors are required
    Jean Iwaz
    Science Editing.2022; 9(2): 142.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of high research performance authors in the field of library and information science and those of their articles
    Yu-Wei Chang
    Scientometrics.2021; 126(4): 3373.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a new institutional medical journal on professional identity development and academic cultural change: A qualitative study
    Victoria Hayes, Emma Williams, Kathleen M. Fairfield, Carolyne Falank, Dina McKelvy, Robert Bing‐You
    Learned Publishing.2021; 34(4): 602.     CrossRef
  • Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors?
    Yu-Wei Chang
    Scientometrics.2019; 121(1): 81.     CrossRef
Comparison of the patterns of duplicate articles between KoreaMed and PubMed journals published from 2004 to 2009 according to the categories of duplicate publications
Soo Young Kim, Chong Woo Bae, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):44-48.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.117
  • 9,414 View
  • 188 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
This study compared the patterns of duplicate articles between KoreaMed and PubMed journals based on a division of duplicate publications into the 4 categories of ‘copy,’ ‘salami’ (fragmentation), ‘imalas’ (disaggregation), and ‘others,’ as well as in terms of the 11 subcategories suggested by Bae et al., which further elaborate on those 4 main categories. We hypothesized that these 2 groups of articles would show different patterns of duplication. Duplicate publications were identified in a random sample of 5% of the articles from the KoreaMed database published between 2004 and 2009, while all articles with the publication type of ‘duplicate publication’ were selected from PubMed over the same period. The selected articles were classified based on the 4 categories and 11 subcategories of duplicate publications, and the data from the 2 groups were compared. A total of 108 articles were selected from KoreaMed and 45 articles were obtained from PubMed. The category of copy was the most common in both databases. The next most frequent pattern was imalas (disaggregation). Pattern of duplicate publication between 2 databases showed no correlation (P = 0.8754). Although the 108 articles from KoreaMed were allocated to all 11 Bae et al.’s subcategories, those from PubMed were allocated to only 8. The above results showed that the articles in the 2 databases had different patterns of duplication, as defined in terms of the 11 subcategories. The use of these 11 subcategories will help journal editors to develop an appropriate framework for considering a variety of duplication types.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles
    Sun Huh
    Neurointervention.2023; 18(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of duplicated publications in Russian journals
    Yury V. Chekhovich, Andrey V. Khazov
    Journal of Informetrics.2022; 16(1): 101246.     CrossRef
  • How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification
    Soo Young Kim, Hyun Jung Yi, Hye-Min Cho, Sun Huh
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 122.     CrossRef
Case Studys
Arbitral action and preventive methods against predatory journal practice
Sung Pil Park, Eric Yong Joong Lee, Ji Hee Suh
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):49-52.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.118
  • 12,143 View
  • 231 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
As open access model of journal publication increases, predatory journals, which deceive scholars to publish journals in fake database websites and exploit them for publishing fee, is also increasing. There are two types of predatory journals. First, journal hijacking and cybersquatting generally create fake database website by mimicking authentic database website, thereby defrauding scholars for publication fee. Second, journal phishing use scam emails to steal scholars’ personal information. If scholars suffered damage from predatory journals, scholars can take either arbitral or judicial actions. Arbitral action follows arbitrational resolution process termed Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy. Scholars can join Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy proceeding with legal entity that has right to authentic database website, which will result in cancellation or transfer of fake database website. In contrast, scholars can take judicial action under Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which may help scholars to recover an actual monetary damage from predatory journals. Nonetheless, taking precaution to avoid predatory journals is the best course of action, rather than going through arduous cure procedures. Scholars may prevent predatory journals by carefully examining fake database website names or email addresses, or observing unreasonable number of published article issues in predatory journal websites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • How to respond to and what to do for papers published in predatory journals?
    Aamir Raoof Memon
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 146.     CrossRef
Citation performance of Indonesian scholarly journals indexed in Scopus from Scopus and Google Scholar
Lukman Lukman, Yan Rianto, Shidiq Al Hakim, Irene M Nadhiroh, Deden Sumirat Hidayat
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):53-58.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.119
  • 13,215 View
  • 318 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Citation frequency is an important factor for estimating the quality of a scientific journal, and the number of citations that an academic paper receives is often used as a measure of its scientific impact. This study aimed to characterize the citation performance of scientific journals published by Indonesian publishers that have been indexed in Scopus by analyzing the number of citations available in the Scopus database and Google Scholar. The results of the study identified 30 Indonesian journals that have been Scopus-indexed, of which 22 were listed in SCImago Journal Rank up to October 2017. Journals in the engineering field were the most cited, with 2,427 citations, including 930 self-citations. A large proportion of the citations were of recently-founded journals. The mean proportional difference in the citation frequency between Scopus and Google Scholar was 14.71%.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Examining the Effect of Innovative Behavior, and the Role of Contingency Plan on HEIs Effective Teaching
    Otto Berman Sihite, Poltak Sinaga, Dylmoon Hidayat, Rosdiana Sijabat
    Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.2024; 18(5): e05178.     CrossRef
  • Indonesian Scientists’ Behavior Relative to Research Data Governance in Preventing WMD-Applicable Technology Transfer
    Lindung Parningotan Manik, Zaenal Akbar, Aris Yaman, Ariani Indrawati
    Publications.2022; 10(4): 50.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of the intellectual structure of clothing and textiles literature
    Joon-Ho Seon, Seong Eun Kim, Hyun-Jung Lee, Kyu-Hye Lee
    The Research Journal of the Costume Culture.2019; 27(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
    Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150.     CrossRef
Reviving a scientific journal: challenges and strategies
Jose Isagani Janairo
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):59-61.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.120
  • 9,388 View
  • 230 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The revival of a scientific journal presents unique challenges in comparison with starting a new journal. In this case study, the experiences encountered in the recent revival of the Manila Journal of Science are outlined and discussed. The Manila Journal of Science is a general science journal published by De La Salle University, Philippines. The challenges faced during the revival of the journal included competition for submissions, restricted budget allocations, peer review, and improving the journal’s reputation. Several strategies were adopted to address these challenges, and the journal’s performance thus far is promising.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Internal affairs: the fate of authors from the University of the Philippines accused of plagiarism, 1990s to 2010s
    Miguel Paolo P. Reyes, Joel F. Ariate
    Science Editing.2019; 6(2): 128.     CrossRef
  • Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
    Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150.     CrossRef
Essays
The international reach of Crossref
Vanessa Fairhurst
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):62-65.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.121
  • 10,257 View
  • 176 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reflections on 4 years in the role of a Crossref ambassador in Korea
    Jae Hwa Chang
    Science Editing.2022; 9(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Crossref at 20 years: what do the community need?
    Rachael Lammey
    Science Editing.2020; 7(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Two international public platforms for the exposure of Archives of Plastic Surgery to worldwide researchers and surgeons: PubMed Central and Crossref
    Sun Huh
    Archives of Plastic Surgery.2020; 47(5): 377.     CrossRef
Sex and gender-related issues in biomedical science
Yong Sung Kim
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):66-69.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.122
  • 9,356 View
  • 197 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors–recommended gender equity policy in nursing journals listed in MEDLINE or PubMed Central: a descriptive study
    Eun Jeong Ko, Geum Hee Jeong
    Science Editing.2024; 11(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Shedding light on biological sex differences and microbiota–gut–brain axis: a comprehensive review of its roles in neuropsychiatric disorders
    Parnian Shobeiri, Amirali Kalantari, Antônio L. Teixeira, Nima Rezaei
    Biology of Sex Differences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex and gender differences in community-acquired pneumonia
    Bernadette Corica, Francesco Tartaglia, Tania D’Amico, Giulio Francesco Romiti, Roberto Cangemi
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2022; 17(6): 1575.     CrossRef
  • Sex Differences in Gut Microbiota
    Yong Sung Kim, Tatsuya Unno, Byung-Yong Kim, Mi-Sung Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2020; 38(1): 48.     CrossRef
Life as an editor: developing a domestic journal to an international journal
Dae-Myung Jue
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):70-72.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.123
  • 8,513 View
  • 198 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information overload?
    Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
    Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150.     CrossRef
Meeting Report
How Asian publishers can compete with publishers in Europe and North America
Sun Huh
Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):73-75.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.124
  • 7,815 View
  • 143 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions will be accepted for inclusion in Scopus
    Sun Huh
    Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 2.     CrossRef
  • How much progress has Blood Research made since the change of the journal title in 2013
    Sun Huh
    Blood Research.2018; 53(2): 95.     CrossRef

Science Editing : Science Editing