- Changes in the absolute numbers and proportions of open access articles from 2000 to 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection: a bibliometric study
-
Jeong-Wook Seo
-
Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):45-56. Published online February 16, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.296
-
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Purpose
The ultimate goal of current open access (OA) initiatives is for library services to use OA resources. This study aimed to assess the infrastructure for OA scholarly information services by tabulating the number and proportion of OA articles in a literature database.
Methods We measured the absolute numbers and proportions of OA articles at different time points across various disciplines based on the Web of Science (WoS) database.
Results The number (proportion) of available OA articles between 2000 and 2021 in the WoS database was 12 million (32.4%). The number (proportion) of indexed OA articles in 1 year was 0.15 million (14.6%) in 2000 and 1.5 million (48.0%) in 2021. The proportion of OA by subject categories in the cumulative data was the highest in the multidisciplinary category (2000–2021, 79%; 2021, 89%), high in natural sciences (2000–2021, 21%–46%; 2021, 41%–62%) and health and medicine (2000–2021, 37%–40%; 2021, 52%–60%), and low in social sciences and others (2000–2021, 23%–32%; 2021, 36%–44%), engineering (2000–2021, 17%–33%; 2021, 31%–39%) and humanities and arts (2000–2021, 11%–22%; 2021, 28%–38%).
Conclusion Our study confirmed that increasingly many OA research papers have been published in the last 20 years, and the recent data show considerable promise for better services in the future. The proportions of OA articles differed among scholarly disciplines, and designing library services necessitates several considerations with regard to the customers’ demands, available OA resources, and strategic approaches to encourage the use of scholarly OA articles.
- Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information
overload?
-
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh
-
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):150-154. Published online August 20, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.141
-
-
10,643
View
-
140
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
2
Crossref
-
PDF
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Disparities of Health Program Information Systems in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Indonesian Health Facility Research 2019
Sri Idaiani, Harimat Hendarwan, Maria Holly Herawati International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(5): 4384. CrossRef - Health Information System Research Situation in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis
Masyri Madjido, Aufia Espressivo, Ahmad Watsiq Maula, Anis Fuad, Mubasysyir Hasanbasri Procedia Computer Science.2019; 161: 781. CrossRef
- Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
-
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2017;4(2):58-69. Published online August 16, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.97
-
Correction in: Sci Ed 2018;5(2):171
-
17,796
View
-
234
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
6
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- The current statistic data on the open access (OA) journals and institutional repositories show some successes and increased awareness on OA in Asian countries. There are several concerns, however, in regards to the access and use of articles by researchers together with the continued increase of libraries’ expenditure for journals. In the present article we introduce five solutions in the global and local perspectives. OA2020 initiative is a global initiative to transform existing journals to OA. Although the practical process of OA2020 remains a challenge, the transformation will increase OA without significant increase of journals and budgets for publishing. The promotion of the local and Asian journals is the second big challenge. Because these local or Asian journals still have important roles in the local research community, they should keep current publishing model of OA at the low cost but with high quality and the better access. The restructuring of the current library budget is the third challenge. The budget for periodicals should be reduced and the saved budget can be used to pay articles processing charge for OA and for purchasing monographs. The fourth important issue is ‘the digital blind spot at the young unemployed and retired elderly’. These groups of poorly supported and potentially important researchers have to be considered as a priority issue to the policies on OA and scholarly knowledge. Lastly, we believe there should be different needs for other activities: optimization of the searchable database, governmental policy on open science and international cooperation on OA.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Changes in the absolute numbers and proportions of open access articles from 2000 to 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection: a bibliometric study
Jeong-Wook Seo Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 45. CrossRef - “I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing
Philips Ayeni Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2023; 60(1): 521. CrossRef - El acceso al conocimiento un derecho universal: las implicaciones sobre la gobernanza de ecosistemas de acceso abierto
Wilson López López Universitas Psychologica.2019; 18(5): 1. CrossRef - Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef - Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information
overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef - Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
|