- Latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms
-
Soon Kim, Eunkyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
-
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):100-112. Published online August 20, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.133
-
-
17,288
View
-
237
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- This review article presents the latest trends in innovative global scholarly journal publication and distribution platforms, with implications for local journals. Changes have taken place in distribution policies, as pre-publication distribution has become a viable option, and for post-publication distribution, public access or mandatory open access policies have been introduced for articles supported by public or governmental funds. New formats of articles include graphical abstracts, interactive PDFs, the application of semantic enhancements, and the utilization of research data, social networking sites, such as Mendeley and ResearchGate, have become common sites for information exchange. Altmetrics have been adopted to complement traditional journal metrics. PubMed Central, F1000Research, KoreaMed Synapse, and ScienceCentral have been introduced as innovative full-text scholarly journal distribution systems. To publish web-based scholarly journals, it is necessary to adopt an open platform and to explore options such as an author profile database, an online collaborative editing module, and Crossref text and data mining services. To maximize the influence of local journals, it is necessary to integrate various external tools, such as researcher ID, research data, social media, and altmetrics services.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Social Interaction Skills Collaboration Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Bibliometric Analysis in Publication 2013-2023
Diajeng Tyas Pinru Phytanza, Edi Purwanta, Hermanto Hermanto International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences.2024; : 1290. CrossRef - Korean researchers’ motivations for publishing in data journals and the usefulness of their data: a qualitative study
Jungyeoun Lee, Jihyun Kim Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 145. CrossRef - Is it possible to foster first-rate publishers through a journal publishing cooperative in Korea?
Sun Huh Archives of Plastic Surgery.2019; 46(01): 3. CrossRef
- Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing
-
Soon Kim, Hyungwook Choi, Nayon Kim, EunKyung Chung, Jae Yun Lee
-
Sci Ed. 2018;5(2):124-134. Published online August 20, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.137
-
-
21,944
View
-
389
Download
-
7
Web of Science
-
6
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- To improve scholarly communications with scientists throughout the world, an international-level manuscript management system is indispensable. We analyzed the manuscript management systems currently in use in Korea and suggested ways to improve these domestic systems through benchmarking with representative overseas systems. Drawing information from the manufacturer’s documentation, we compared the functionalities of the major manuscript management systems available in Korea to international systems. Based on this analysis, we identified the essential elements necessary to meet international standards. The representative international systems provide an intuitive interface and an efficient communication channel for authors, editors, and reviewers, enabling them to save time. The two domestic paid systems are almost at the international level; however, the free systems developed in Korea need to be upgraded. In particular, more advanced visualization tools, more efficient tools for communication between stakeholders, and convenient linking to external content are needed. Studies of these manuscript management systems, which are essential for the internationalization of domestic journals, can be utilized as primary materials to improve the level of Korean academic journals in response to the rapid changes in modern scholarly communication.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall Learned Publishing.2024; 37(1): 4. CrossRef - Should publishers use online submission systems to harvest authors’ responses to diversity, equity and inclusion?
J. A. Teixeira da Silva Science Editor and Publisher.2023; 7(2): 210. CrossRef - An Exploratory Study into Professional Scholarly Journals Publishing Software Adoption in Lithuania
Vincas Grigas, Arūnas Gudinavičius, Tomas Petreikis, Andrius Šuminas Information & Media.2023; 96: 179. CrossRef - A Blockchain-Based Editorial Management System
Eman-Yaser Daraghmi, Mamoun Abu Helou, Yousef-Awwad Daraghmi, omar cheikhrouhou Security and Communication Networks.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef - Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world
Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Sam T. Mathew, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Saleh A. Alqahtani Science Editing.2021; 8(2): 134. CrossRef - The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal
Pierpaolo Dondio, Niccolò Casnici, Francisco Grimaldo, Nigel Gilbert, Flaminio Squazzoni Journal of Informetrics.2019; 13(2): 708. CrossRef
|