- Influence of artificial intelligence and chatbots on research integrity and publication ethics
-
Payam Hosseinzadeh Kasani, Kee Hyun Cho, Jae-Won Jang, Cheol-Heui Yun
-
Sci Ed. 2024;11(1):12-25. Published online January 25, 2024
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.323
-
-
4,995
View
-
262
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots are rapidly supplanting human-derived scholarly work in the fast-paced digital age. This necessitates a re-evaluation of our traditional research and publication ethics, which is the focus of this article. We explore the ethical issues that arise when AI chatbots are employed in research and publication. We critically examine the attribution of academic work, strategies for preventing plagiarism, the trustworthiness of AI-generated content, and the integration of empathy into these systems. Current approaches to ethical education, in our opinion, fall short of appropriately addressing these problems. We propose comprehensive initiatives to tackle these emerging ethical concerns. This review also examines the limitations of current chatbot detectors, underscoring the necessity for more sophisticated technology to safeguard academic integrity. The incorporation of AI and chatbots into the research environment is set to transform the way we approach scholarly inquiries. However, our study emphasizes the importance of employing these tools ethically within research and academia. As we move forward, it is of the utmost importance to concentrate on creating robust, flexible strategies and establishing comprehensive regulations that effectively align these potential technological developments with stringent ethical standards. We believe that this is an essential measure to ensure that the advancement of AI chatbots significantly augments the value of scholarly research activities, including publications, rather than introducing potential ethical quandaries.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Generative AI, Research Ethics, and Higher Education Research: Insights from a Scientometric Analysis
Saba Mansoor Qadhi, Ahmed Alduais, Youmen Chaaban, Majeda Khraisheh Information.2024; 15(6): 325. CrossRef - Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Zafer Kocak Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Research Ethics - A Systematic Review
Gabriel Andrade-Hidalgo, Pedro Mio-Cango, Orlando Iparraguirre-Villanueva Journal of Academic Ethics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
- Current status and demand for educational activities on publication ethics by academic organizations in Korea: a descriptive study
-
Yera Hur, Cheol-Heui Yun
-
Sci Ed. 2023;10(1):64-70. Published online February 16, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.298
-
-
2,424
View
-
227
Download
-
1
Web of Science
-
1
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Purpose
This study aimed to examine the following overarching issues: the current status of research and publication ethics training conducted in Korean academic organizations and what needs to be done to reinforce research and publication ethics training.
Methods A survey with 12 items was examined in a pilot survey, followed by a main survey that was distributed to 2,487 academic organizations. A second survey, which contained six additional questions, was dispatched to the same subjects. The results of each survey were analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, content analysis, and comparative analysis.
Results More than half of the academic organizations provided research and publication ethics training programs, with humanities and social sciences organizations giving more training than the others (χ2=11.190, df=2, P=0.004). The results showed that research and publication ethics training was held mostly once and less than an hour per year, mainly in a lecture format. No significant difference was found in the training content among academic fields. The academic organizations preferred case-based discussion training methods and wanted expert instructors who could give tailored training with examples.
Conclusion A systematic training program that can develop ethics instructors tailored to specific academic fields and financial support from academic organizations can help scholarly editors resolve the apparent gap between the real and the ideal in ethics training, and ultimately to achieve the competency needed to train their own experts.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Influence of artificial intelligence and chatbots on research integrity and publication ethics
Payam Hosseinzadeh Kasani, Kee Hyun Cho, Jae-Won Jang, Cheol-Heui Yun Science Editing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
- Consultation questions on publication ethics from 2016 to 2020 addressed by the Committee on Publication Ethics of the Korean Council of Science Editors
-
Woo Jin Son, Cheol-Heui Yun
-
Sci Ed. 2021;8(1):112-116. Published online February 20, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.238
-
-
4,794
View
-
89
Download
-
1
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- With the goal of improving the publishing ecosystem and promoting transparency in journal publishing, we describe some recent cases in scientific publishing in Korea. The current article summarizes ethical inquiries from domestic journals and publishers, most of whom are members of the Korean Council of Science Editors. We selected 15 representative questions asked during the last 4 years. Those inquiries were classified into hot topics such as plagiarism, duplicate publications, multiple submission, and others (informed consent, copyright, compliance with journal regulations, authors’ responsibilities, and voluntary retraction requests). When plagiarism is suspected, editors and reviewers should assess the situation following the relevant rules and procedures, and if necessary, the manuscript should be rejected. Cases of duplicate publication should be clearly stated in both papers based on the explicit agreement of the editor-in-chief of both journals. As a general rule, the entire content of an article should be published in one issue, but if the article is too long, it may need to be published in two issues. Permission from both journals is required. The abstract and references should be separated accordingly. In cases of copyright conflict, voluntary withdrawal of a paper, or non-compliance with publishing regulations, the manuscript must be withdrawn according to specific procedures (referring to the COPE flow chart). All correspondence regarding a manuscript should be with the corresponding author, who communicates directly with the journal. We hope that these recommendations will help readers in the field of scientific publishing to address issues related to publication ethics.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Congratulations on Child Health Nursing Research becoming a PubMed Central journal and reflections on its significance
Sun Huh Child Health Nursing Research.2022; 28(1): 1. CrossRef
- Equality, equity, and reality of open access on scholarly information
-
Jeong-Wook Seo, Hosik Chung, Tae-Sul Seo, Youngim Jung, Eun Seong Hwang, Cheol-Heui Yun, Hyungsun Kim
-
Sci Ed. 2017;4(2):58-69. Published online August 16, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.97
-
Correction in: Sci Ed 2018;5(2):171
-
17,887
View
-
234
Download
-
6
Web of Science
-
6
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- The current statistic data on the open access (OA) journals and institutional repositories show some successes and increased awareness on OA in Asian countries. There are several concerns, however, in regards to the access and use of articles by researchers together with the continued increase of libraries’ expenditure for journals. In the present article we introduce five solutions in the global and local perspectives. OA2020 initiative is a global initiative to transform existing journals to OA. Although the practical process of OA2020 remains a challenge, the transformation will increase OA without significant increase of journals and budgets for publishing. The promotion of the local and Asian journals is the second big challenge. Because these local or Asian journals still have important roles in the local research community, they should keep current publishing model of OA at the low cost but with high quality and the better access. The restructuring of the current library budget is the third challenge. The budget for periodicals should be reduced and the saved budget can be used to pay articles processing charge for OA and for purchasing monographs. The fourth important issue is ‘the digital blind spot at the young unemployed and retired elderly’. These groups of poorly supported and potentially important researchers have to be considered as a priority issue to the policies on OA and scholarly knowledge. Lastly, we believe there should be different needs for other activities: optimization of the searchable database, governmental policy on open science and international cooperation on OA.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Changes in the absolute numbers and proportions of open access articles from 2000 to 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection: a bibliometric study
Jeong-Wook Seo Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 45. CrossRef - “I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing
Philips Ayeni Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology.2023; 60(1): 521. CrossRef - El acceso al conocimiento un derecho universal: las implicaciones sobre la gobernanza de ecosistemas de acceso abierto
Wilson López López Universitas Psychologica.2019; 18(5): 1. CrossRef - Journal metrics of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology based on the Web of Science Core Collection
Sun Huh Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 137. CrossRef - Why and how do we keep editing local medical journals in an era of information
overload?
Viera Wardhani, Sam Mathew, Jeong-Wook Seo, Komang G. Wiryawan, Vivi Setiawaty, Burmaajav Badrakh Science Editing.2018; 5(2): 150. CrossRef - Recent advances of medical journals in Korea and and further development strategies: Is it possible for them to publish Nobel Prize-winning research?
Sun Huh Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(9): 524. CrossRef
|